We performed a comparison between Infobright DB and SAP BW4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse."It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"Some of the main features of this solution are that it uses HANA and it has good performance."
"The solution's performance is really good. Also, it's easy to operate, easy to administer, and relatively simple to install."
"I like that it's quite quick."
"The UI is completely new, beautiful, and user-friendly. There are some other helpful features like global filters and advanced tools. We can perform custom calculations easily From a technical perspective, the performance has been enhanced and optimized for a limited number of flows. The content settings are more advanced, and there are so many other features that I can't name them all."
"We benefited from BW/4HANA's ability to utilize predefined content inside. We didn't need to start from scratch."
"The most valuable feature is that we can transform a huge amount of data and apply business logic as per the requirements."
"The ability to instantly pull data is the most valuable feature."
"Out of the box, this solution has a lot of standard features."
"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"I would like more integration."
"There's one area where the other vendors have an upper edge, which is the data lake. I think SAP is trying to figure out whether to stick with IQ, their own data lake solution, or push customers toward customer-preferred vendors, like Azure Data Lake, AWS, or any other provider."
"The product needs to improve with more performance and fewer data layers."
"Support could be more reliable."
"We cannot integrate with third-party tools like Python or advanced integration options. You can't fine-tune tables within BW or generate specific views or reports."
"The speed of operations could be a little faster."
"The licensing cost could be made better."
"There's the complexity in migration from BW to BW/4HANA, especially with data migration."
Earn 20 points
Infobright DB is ranked 27th in Data Warehouse while SAP BW4HANA is ranked 7th in Data Warehouse with 36 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 7.6, while SAP BW4HANA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP BW4HANA writes "An easy-to-operate and administer tool that needs to consider revising its existing licensing cost". Infobright DB is most compared with MySQL and LocalDB, whereas SAP BW4HANA is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Snowflake, SAP HANA, Amazon Redshift and SQL Server.
See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
