Inflectra Rapise vs OpenText Functional Testing comparison

Inflectra and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Inflectra is ranked #21 with an average rating of 4.0, while OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8. Inflectra holds a 0.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to OpenText’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

531 Views
175 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing

Read 97 OpenText Functional Testing reviews

8,018 Views
6,334 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

OpenText Functional Testing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing and Inflectra Rapise are software testing solutions. OpenText seems to hold the upper hand in enterprise adaptability, while Inflectra Rapise leads in feature diversity and cost-effectiveness.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports a wide range of applications, facilitates seamless integration with enterprise systems, and offers flexible deployment options for large organizations. Inflectra Rapise supports various automation scripts, excels in adaptability to different testing technologies, and offers strong cloud-based deployment options.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing could enhance its cloud-based capabilities, simplify the initial setup process, and improve feature variety for different scripting languages. Inflectra Rapise could benefit from strengthening on-premise deployment support, expanding integration with enterprise systems, and widening its customer support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing provides seamless on-premise deployment with strong vendor support, suited for large organizations. Inflectra Rapise offers agile cloud-based deployment, more suitable for smaller, dynamic teams, with flexibility for collaborative testing environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing has higher upfront costs but delivers significant value for large-scale systems. Inflectra Rapise offers competitive pricing and strong ROI due to its flexible licensing and efficient cost management, making it attractive across varied team sizes.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Functional Testing Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Functional Testing

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (30th)

OpenText Functional Testing

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing is 8.7%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Functional Testing	8.7%
Inflectra Rapise	0.3%
Other	91.0%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."

"It is a stable solution."

"The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy and straightforward."

"The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers."

"The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols."

"The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers."

"UFT has improved our ability to regression test."

More OpenText Functional Testing pros

Cons

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on specialist resources."

"The product doesn't provide free training for the basic features."

"The solution needs better marketing, training, promotion, and visibility because it is not visible."

"You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out."

"We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing."

"Sometimes UFT can take a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected."

"They should include an automated feature to load backlog tests."

"I'd like to see test case-related reports included in the solution."

More OpenText Functional Testing cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""

"The licensing and pricing model is confusing."

"It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."

"For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

More OpenText Functional Testing pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	71

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

Areas of OpenText Functional Testing that have room for improvement include having an option to store objects in the public repository when using Object Spy and adding objects, as it currently stor...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 25% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

September 2025

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

September 2025

Download OpenText Functional Testing product report

Also Known As

Rapise

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

Overview

Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

Inflectra

OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.

OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Multiplatform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across technologies, browsers, and platforms.
Automation Span: Provides automation for APIs, GUIs, SAP, and Oracle applications.
Intuitive Design: Object identification and recording simplify usage for all coding levels.
Integration Capabilities: Interfaces with tools like Jenkins and ALM for streamlined testing.
Built-in Frameworks: Offers frameworks like BPT for accelerated test development.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Manual Testing: Minimizes the effort required for manual testing tasks.
Time Efficiency: Accelerates testing processes with user-friendly features.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with CI/CD tools, enhancing operational productivity.
Comprehensive Coverage: Automates test cases involving multiple scenarios effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.

OpenText

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Functional Testing

September 2025

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Functional Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Functional Testing and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Functional Testing report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.