Inflectra Rapise vs Nintex RPA comparison

Inflectra and Nintex are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Inflectra is ranked #32 with an average rating of 4.0, while Nintex is ranked #23 with an average rating of 6.5. Inflectra holds a 0.6% mindshare in RPA, compared to Nintex’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

864 Views
389 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Nintex RPA

Read 30 Nintex RPA reviews

1,919 Views
1,861 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Nintex RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Inflectra Rapise and Nintex RPA are competitors in the automation market. While Inflectra Rapise is noted for its cost-effectiveness and support, Nintex RPA is favored for its advanced features and functionality, giving it an edge in comprehensive automation solutions.

Features: Inflectra Rapise provides flexible automation capabilities, strong integration support, and a comprehensive testing framework. Nintex RPA offers powerful workflow automation, extensive cloud integration, and a scalable platform that supports complex business processes.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could enhance its advanced automation functionalities and scalability options. Additionally, improving error handling and logging features could advance its reliability. Nintex RPA may benefit from refining its user interface for more intuitive use. Expanding support channels and documentation could further aid user adoption and troubleshooting. Optimizing initial setup and deployment time could also enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise ensures easy deployment with accessible customer support, making adoption straightforward. Nintex RPA supports its deployment model with superior customer assistance, providing prompt issue resolution that enhances user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise is noted for its affordability, offering significant value over time, making it a good fit for budget-conscious buyers. Nintex RPA, although requiring a higher initial investment, offers a substantial long-term ROI through efficiencies and scalability, which may appeal to buyers seeking more comprehensive automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

32nd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (20th), AI Quality Assurance (2nd)

Nintex RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 2.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nintex RPA	2.0%
Inflectra Rapise	0.6%
Other	97.4%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

JonathanNg

Global Automation Lead - Customer Operations at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows

To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"The advanced Excel functionalities are really convenient because we work a lot with spreadsheets. It’s also easy to use the HTML selectors. It’s just a click and it picks it up. There’s not a lot of no hard-coding with it."

"The thing that we find the most value in is the Process Discovery component and the ability to really see what users are doing on a day-to-day basis. We're starting to make sense of the processes that they're doing and getting visibility into what they're doing. Overall, the Process Discovery is very good."

"We use PowerBuilder as our application building codex. Kryon adds flexibility when we have the functionality of SQL, where we can take sets of data out of the back-end and run complex computations or do a bunch of data validations inside the wizard. It can save us sometimes dozens of steps, then if we were to try and do those same reviews using the user interface completely. The balance that we get from using Kryon RPA, alongside being able to screen scrape and frequent screen, gives us an advantage that we haven't had previously with any of our other attempts at robotic process automation."

"The recording feature enables us to record what we're doing, like typing or clicking the mouse, and to identify objects on the screen. We basically teach the program how to type, instead of a person. That's the most powerful feature."

"While we have only explored the simple use cases so far, Nintex RPA has good integration capabilities, such as working well with Gmail and Outlook to automate document handling and notifications."

"The full-service automation aspects and the process discovery are the most valuable features of Kryon RPA."

"It's very seamless to interact with Excel files and web app pages."

"The bot is typically about twice as fast as a person and more accurate, as long as the data going in is good. That is the biggest advantage."

More Nintex RPA pros

Cons

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"Another major drawback is OCR. We are not able to read scanned documents correctly in a reliable way. There is always some margin of error. Some of the processes require us to read scanned documents, and you need to ensure that it is 100 percent accurate. Without that level of assurance, you can't automate such tasks."

"We have found some difficulties regarding the integration with legacy systems where the screen has elements in the Hebrew language. The connection to Hebrew, right-to-left systems, is more challenging."

"I have seen some very minor occurrences where Kryon's interactions with Microsoft Office might cause the robot to hang. However, it is about one to two percent of the time where we are seeing this happen. It is such a small percentage that it's not even something that we are overly worried about. This would be where they might have some stability issues, but it could be the Microsoft Office API or how they are interacting together."

"We would like to see having a little more specific documentation, or some of the examples be easier to find. One of the big things that we get directed to now is the Kryon Community page, but a lot of that wasn't in existence or publicized when we started doing our training and education. Now, we're stumbling through using it. For the majority of the time, we have either had to try and interpret what the instructions meant or do a service desk ticket."

"It would be better to have [upgrades] done automatically, like an application on your smartphone. Or even if done manually, the upgrade should just be "next, next, next," and it's upgraded, rather than making it a project to upgrade."

"At first, we had problems with the object detection but in this latest release it has been better, and I think it keeps getting better."

"Kryon RPA need to enhance the robustness of our multi-board architecture to ensure the availability of bots on multiple machines."

"What needs improvement in Kryon RPA is the support. Sometimes, the solution has problems, so I contacted support, but I didn't receive immediate help from the team. You have to wait a while before the problem gets solved. This happens a few times in terms of getting cases solved. It would also be better if Kryon RPA had a cloud version because currently, from what I know, it only has an on-premise version, though I could be wrong about that. There isn't any additional feature I'd like added to Kryon RPA because it's a good service, but the support is very, very bad, so that area could be improved."

More Nintex RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We have a yearly license. It's about $5,000 per year."

"In addition to the standard licensing costs, there are manpower costs."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"Compared to its competitors, Kryon RPA's pricing is very competitive."

"Kryon is slightly more expensive compared to UiPath."

"For an unattended robot it's $6000 a month."

"We've more than broken even over on the license. Year to date, we are at $120,000 in savings."

"They license per robot and we have 25 robots. You get so many robot licenses and can allocate those licenses to either attended, unintended, or Process Discovery bots. If you have 25 licenses, for example, you could have 20 automation bots and five process discovery. This allocation is flexible. There are also maintenance costs."

More Nintex RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 5250 emulator, in addition Datamatics TruBot is an alternative solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nintex RPA?

Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?

Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 33% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 28% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 21% of the time

NICE Robotic Automation vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 19% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

Fortra's Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 18% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Nintex RPA

Compared 15% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Nintex RPA

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs Nintex RPA

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 8% of the time

More Nintex RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

January 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA

January 2026

Download Nintex RPA product report

Also Known As

Rapise

Kryon RPA

Overview

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

Using Nintex RPA, enterprises can leverage trained bots to quickly and cost-effectively automate routine tasks without the use of code in an easy-to-use drag and drop interface. Users are now equipped with a comprehensive, enterprise-grade process management and automation solution that streamlines processes fueled by both structured and unstructured data sources.

Nintex

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA

December 2025

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.