Inflectra Rapise vs Nintex RPA comparison

Inflectra and Nintex are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Inflectra is ranked #42, while Nintex is ranked #21 with an average rating of 5.7. Inflectra holds a 0.8% mindshare in RPA, compared to Nintex’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

1,317 Views
579 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Nintex RPA

Read 30 Nintex RPA reviews

2,328 Views
2,281 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Nintex RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Inflectra Rapise and Nintex RPA compete in the robotic process automation market. While Inflectra Rapise shines in support and pricing, Nintex RPA offers a more extensive feature set, making it a preferred choice.

Features: Inflectra Rapise is flexible and supports test automation across various environments with scriptless testing and robust integrations. Nintex RPA excels in workflow automation, smooth ecosystem integration, and advanced data processing.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could enhance its complex automation features and data handling capabilities. Nintex RPA might benefit from a simpler setup process and pricing transparency. Usability improvements in Nintex's interface could also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise has a straightforward installation, with acclaimed customer service. Nintex RPA needs a more complex setup but offers extensive support resources, ensuring thorough assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise is cost-effective with a lower initial setup cost, ensuring quicker ROI. Nintex RPA, despite its higher cost, delivers long-term value with robust features, leading to significant ROI over time as it streamlines processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

42nd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (26th), AI Quality Assurance (5th)

Nintex RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex RPA	2.2%
Inflectra Rapise	0.8%
Other	97.0%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

JonathanNg

Global Automation Lead - Customer Operations at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows

To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The initial setup was straightforward; it wasn't complex at all, and we found it nice and easy."

"Rapise is a good automation tool that's easy to use and learn, and you can share scripts as a team, which is very helpful."

"It's incredible but the support and maintenance of Inflectra Rapise's scripts is less than 30% of the effort that was involved in maintaining Selenium, it is very easy and this is the reason that we are switching everything that needs handling from Selenium to Inflectra Rapise, as it is easy to maintain and provides a benefit in cost and efforts with a 90% reduction factor in the maintenance of the scripts."

"The first time I used Rapise I completed the automation scripts for a full application in a day and I was shocked how easy it was."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"We saved thousands of dollars because the Rapise implementation gave us 30 or more executions for every release compared to three or four, so huge savings on manual testing effort plus easy detection of defects is very cost effective."

More Inflectra Rapise pros

"This rate system has allowed us to be more responsive and competitive with our rates with less human involvement."

"Once I decide a process is suitable as a Kryon solution, the cycle of automation is quite quick. I learn about the manual process and I'm one of the two guys who program the Kryon environment. It's relatively simple. There are many details, but once you understand the concept it is quite easy."

"We use PowerBuilder as our application building codex. Kryon adds flexibility when we have the functionality of SQL, where we can take sets of data out of the back-end and run complex computations or do a bunch of data validations inside the wizard. It can save us sometimes dozens of steps, then if we were to try and do those same reviews using the user interface completely. The balance that we get from using Kryon RPA, alongside being able to screen scrape and frequent screen, gives us an advantage that we haven't had previously with any of our other attempts at robotic process automation."

"The number of commands it gives us to edit and modify is really good. It also captures screen activities and plays them back."

"We have absolutely seen return on investment; we felt that we had to get to between 40 and 80 hours of weekly savings to get our ROI and we're already almost there, and that's good news overall."

"It's very seamless to interact with Excel files and web app pages."

"It has been helpful in reducing the manpower and error rate since we are able to run tasks 24/7 without interruptions. As humans definitely take breaks and there may be absenteeism that is unexpected, the solution provides continuous work. Humans tend to make errors once in a while, but the solution has almost zero percent errors."

"All our users have no technical background. But Kryon is really simple and intuitive. Our business adapted very quickly and easily. This is the main thing and it's why we love the system so much. It's why we are always trying to put more processes into the system and make more use cases: because of the simplicity and the intuitive nature of the system."

More Nintex RPA pros

Cons

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"What I have noticed about Rapise is that sometimes when you keep on using the same script, it fails many times."

"When there are failures in a nightly run of batches of scripts, it can create a blocking situation where all the following scripts will fail due to unexpected results."

"It has some stability issues where the tool crashes sometimes on Windows 10."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"The maintenance is very difficult."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

More Inflectra Rapise cons

"I would like to see a better OCR solution."

"I have seen some very minor occurrences where Kryon's interactions with Microsoft Office might cause the robot to hang. However, it is about one to two percent of the time where we are seeing this happen. It is such a small percentage that it's not even something that we are overly worried about. This would be where they might have some stability issues, but it could be the Microsoft Office API or how they are interacting together."

"There isn't any additional feature I'd like added to Kryon RPA because it's a good service, but the support is very, very bad, so that area could be improved."

"We need better training and community support in Indonesia."

"Another major drawback is OCR. We are not able to read scanned documents correctly in a reliable way."

"We need stronger governance to know, when a transaction is done, whether it worked or failed; strong logging. That would be helpful."

"What we are lacking is OCR, the ability to read text."

"The process discovery tool of Kryon RPA could be improved because of its limitations."

More Nintex RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"The price is affordable."

"We are probably saving $6000 to $8000 a month in labor costs. It's not a ton, but we're right around $60,000 to $80,000 a year with our current deployment."

"We've more than broken even over on the license. Year to date, we are at $120,000 in savings."

"It is very cheap. I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"Kryon is slightly more expensive compared to UiPath."

"We have been able to alleviate two FTEs, which was a big savings for us. We were able to reuse those resources in other locations. It is over 5000 hours a year in total savings."

"In addition to the standard licensing costs, there are manpower costs."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

More Nintex RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Performing Arts

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 5250 emulator, in addition Datamatics TruBot is an alternative solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nintex RPA?

Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?

Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 6% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 4% of the time

LEAPWORK vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 4% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Nintex RPA

Compared 14% of the time

Fortra's Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Nintex RPA

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs Nintex RPA

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

March 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA

March 2026

Download Nintex RPA product report

Also Known As

Rapise

Kryon RPA

Overview

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

Using Nintex RPA, enterprises can leverage trained bots to quickly and cost-effectively automate routine tasks without the use of code in an easy-to-use drag and drop interface. Users are now equipped with a comprehensive, enterprise-grade process management and automation solution that streamlines processes fueled by both structured and unstructured data sources.

Nintex

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA

March 2026

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Nintex RPA report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.