Inflectra Rapise vs LambdaTest comparison

Read 27 LambdaTest reviews

3,057 Views
1,009 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Inflectra Rapise and LambdaTest are competing products in the field of software testing and automation. Inflectra Rapise holds an advantage in pricing and support, while LambdaTest stands out for its advanced features.

Features: Inflectra Rapise offers robust automation testing capabilities, supports multiple platforms, and integrates with popular development tools. LambdaTest provides a cloud-based testing environment, supports a wide range of browser and OS configurations, and offers geolocation testing.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could benefit from enhanced cloud-based solutions, improved cross-browser testing capabilities, and more intuitive user interfaces. LambdaTest may improve by offering more cost-effective pricing plans, optimizing system performance for large-scale tests, and expanding support for additional automation tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise provides straightforward on-premise deployment, appealing to companies that prefer control over their tools, with reliable customer service. LambdaTest facilitates quick cloud-based deployment, allowing seamless scaling and commendable customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise features competitive pricing with lower initial costs, suitable for small to medium enterprises. LambdaTest, with a higher upfront cost, justifies its pricing through ROI from its extensive testing capabilities and scalability, appealing to businesses focused on comprehensive automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. LambdaTest Report (Updated: July 2025).

Inflectra Rapise vs. LambdaTest

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (30th)

LambdaTest

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LambdaTest is 2.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Dinesh Saharan

Presales at Net Solutions

The tool reduces the manual effort needed and helps automate certain tasks for users

I won't be able to comment on what could be improved in the solution since I am not the one who handles LambdaTest. It is our company's IT team that takes care of LambdaTest. Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis. If something is perfect, it doesn't mean that it doesn't need to improvise or improve, like in terms of adding new features. There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"

"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."

"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."

"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."

"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."

"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."

"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

More LambdaTest pros

Cons

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."

"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."

"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."

"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."

"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."

"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."

"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."

More LambdaTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Comparisons

No data available

Compared 65% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 14% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Product Reports

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Inflectra Rapise

August 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

August 2025

Also Known As

Rapise

No data available

Overview

Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

Inflectra

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka