IFS Cloud Platform vs ManageEngine IT360 comparison

IFS and ManageEngine are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. IFS is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #38. IFS holds a 1.9% mindshare in IAM, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IFS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

IFS Cloud Platform

Read 30 IFS Cloud Platform reviews

4,095 Views
410 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT360

Read 5 ManageEngine IT360 reviews

454 Views
82 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IFS Cloud Platform

ManageEngine IT360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IFS Cloud Platform and ManageEngine IT360 are competitors in IT management and enterprise solutions. ManageEngine IT360 holds an edge due to its comprehensive feature set, offering better value despite potentially higher costs.

Features: IFS Cloud Platform excels in integration capabilities, ensuring seamless connectivity across enterprise functions. Its user-friendly interface and component-based architecture enhance usability. ManageEngine IT360 shines in IT operations with robust monitoring, service management, and alerting capabilities, making it highly effective for IT-specific tasks.

Room for Improvement: IFS Cloud Platform could enhance its IT-specific features and streamline complex customization. It might also benefit from expanding its monitoring capabilities. ManageEngine IT360 could improve its deployment simplicity and broaden its integration options. It may also work on enhancing user interface flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IFS Cloud Platform offers a straightforward cloud deployment model with quick integration and strong support, making it easy to integrate with existing systems. ManageEngine IT360, although more complex in its deployment process, provides comprehensive support and detailed setup guidance to simplify the process.

Pricing and ROI: IFS Cloud Platform involves moderate setup costs, offering ROI through improved organizational efficiency. ManageEngine IT360 might require a higher initial investment but provides significant ROI with its feature-rich IT management capabilities, justifying its expense.

To learn more, read our detailed IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT360 Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT360

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in IT Asset Management

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (20th), Customer Experience Management (8th), Field Service Management (1st), Help Desk Software (12th), ERP (12th), Activity Based Costing Software (6th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (2nd), Local Government CRM (8th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (10th), License Management (2nd)

ManageEngine IT360

Ranking in IT Asset Management

38th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (110th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (77th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 1.9%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT360 is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

Brendan Fisher

IFS Applications Consultant at Zest Business Process Management Ltd

Robust, customizable, and modern

IFS is a very large and complex software, and implementation of IFS can be challenging and may lead to a difficult lengthy project. It can take between 12 and 24 months in some cases to deploy. I have found that not all clients are fully aware of how big the task is that they're undertaking when they make a decision to move to software like this. Companies need to be more aware of the complexity of an ERP implementation project and while I fully recommend moving to IFS, it is not easy and does require business change when adopting an ERP solution. New features are a difficult ask - I work across multiple industries and everyone would probably choose a different feature. Maybe BIM in Construction or Customs link-ups for importers/exporters.

Read full review

Ziyad Moghalis

It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)

Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy

This solution is good for configuration management. The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training. ManageEngine is easy to deploy. It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network. The alerting capability is good and it will send out emails.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are fewer fields on the user screen compared to other products."

"Having a young talented programmer, during the six years of use, we were able to save around 75 000 EUR preparing simple modifications using customization rather than ordering them in IFS / Partner."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users."

"Individual user profiles that can be configured as templates to minimize data entry."

"IFS has been completely rebuilt, modernized, and cloud-based so we don't need bulky software installations."

"The solution overall is very versatile and flexible, especially compared to other products."

"The financial posting controls are quite handy. The user interface is really friendly, highly flexible, and pretty intuitive for end users."

"The best feature is the maintenance module, which is essentially an industry-specific workflow designed with a manufacturing module as per industry standards. It's very precise and specific without having complex functionalities. It's straightforward. Field Service Management is definitely a wonderful product that IFS has developed because it caters to field services. The energy and utility sectors can answer their business needs using the software."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

"The technical support is good."

"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."

"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."

Cons

"IFS uses Crystal Report mostly, which isn't too user-friendly. Developing reports isn't easy and requires a lot of dev time. Since SAP bought it, Crystal Report has become more complicated to use on IFS. You have a dashboard for reporting that is good, but it's incomplete. Most of our clients use Power BI or some additional tooling for BI."

"There should be some improvements in the predefined templates in IFS Applications."

"I'm a business analyst, so I do a lot of customer-facing work. I take calls from businesses I have to troubleshoot. One thing that bugs me is the error messages you get from IFS. If I get an error message, I have to dig to find the cause because, often, the error message doesn't precisely describe the problem. It'll hint about where the problem lies, but you have to work to find the root cause. It doesn't help in my situation. You expect an error message to point to the field or what is causing the issue."

"The next version has already been released, and some of the technical things are a little bit behind the curve in development. This is specifically security, maintenance, security role maintenance, and creation. This is in their new product, called IFS Cloud."

"Technical support could be improved."

"Customization needs to be improved."

"Ability to place approval check-points in the custom workflow, so clients can decide what they want it."

"The solution needs to improve its documentation and user-friendliness."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There's an additional yearly cost for support."

"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."

"I consider it to be a well-priced solution compared to other mid-range or high-end ERP solutions."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The additional cost that comes with the solution includes the overhead of the people who are trying to fix the tool issues. These people are trying to reproduce the issue and report it to the technical support and testing with them which is huge. It is the cost of quality in the end."

"Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs."

"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."

"It is better to buy implementation services from IFS than from partners"

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IFS Applications?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

I am not able to recall much about batch. Documentation-wise, they need more. There is not much available online, and the documentation availability is on the lower side compared to other products,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

Motadata Network Management System vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 52% of the time

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 48% of the time

More ManageEngine IT360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform

August 2025

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2025

Download ManageEngine IT360 product report

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

IT360

Overview

IFS is the world’s leading provider of Industrial AI and enterprise software for hardcore businesses that make, service, and power our planet. Our technology enables businesses which manufacture goods, maintain complex assets, and manage service-focused operations to unlock the transformative power of Industrial AI™ to enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Industrial AI is IFS.ai.

IFS Cloud is a fully composable AI-powered platform, designed for ultimate flexibility and adaptability to our customers’ specific requirements and business evolution. It spans the needs of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Information Technology Service Management (ITSM), and Field Service Management (FSM). IFS technology leverages AI, machine learning, real-time data and analytics to empower our customers to make informed strategic decisions and excel at their Moment of Service™.

IFS

With IT360 you will deliver services efficiently with maximum scalability. Service providers can now accurately manage the SLAs and release new services faster with features like Multi-tenancy, High Availability, Enterprise level systems and Datacenter monitoring, Remote site monitoring and Customer and site-specific dashboards.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT360

July 2025

Free Report: IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT360

Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT360 and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IFS Cloud Platform vs. ManageEngine IT360 report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.