IFS Cloud Platform vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management comparison

IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (21st), Customer Experience Management (7th), Field Service Management (2nd), Help Desk Software (12th), ERP (12th), Activity Based Costing Software (7th), Local Government CRM (9th), IT Asset Management (10th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (11th), License Management (2nd)

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne As...

Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 9.4%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is 2.6%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)

Featured Reviews

Brendan Fisher

IFS Applications Consultant at Zest Business Process Management Ltd

Robust, customizable, and modern

IFS is a very large and complex software, and implementation of IFS can be challenging and may lead to a difficult lengthy project. It can take between 12 and 24 months in some cases to deploy. I have found that not all clients are fully aware of how big the task is that they're undertaking when they make a decision to move to software like this. Companies need to be more aware of the complexity of an ERP implementation project and while I fully recommend moving to IFS, it is not easy and does require business change when adopting an ERP solution. New features are a difficult ask - I work across multiple industries and everyone would probably choose a different feature. Maybe BIM in Construction or Customs link-ups for importers/exporters.

Read full review

IanCampbell

CEO at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Provides simple module navigation

The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is the ability to navigate through the module The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would. I have been using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The financial posting controls are quite handy. The user interface is really friendly, highly flexible, and pretty intuitive for end users."

"The main reason for the ERP project was to bring together our fourteen sites, which had until then worked in separate silos."

"Some of the strengths are Enterprise Management Solutions and the series of Management solutions which is number one in Gartner's report and has been for the last five years."

"All the modules are valuable in their own right, but everything has to go through the ERP. IFS has done an excellent job integrating the various modules to complete these processes. My expertise is in the finance module, but I have used the other verticals. It's an all-around good product."

"The platform is reliable and stable."

"Feature-wise, I like the way it provides inventory details...It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable features of IFS Applications are their intuitiveness and ease of use. The navigations are also straightforward, which makes it easy to train users. The feedback I always receive is that it is very user-friendly."

"We could quickly understand what was going on and what the customer wanted to do."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

"The product enables us to track our assets."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."

"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."

Cons

"Documentation-wise, they need more."

"IFS uses Crystal Report mostly, which isn't too user-friendly. Developing reports isn't easy and requires a lot of dev time. Since SAP bought it, Crystal Report has become more complicated to use on IFS. You have a dashboard for reporting that is good, but it's incomplete. Most of our clients use Power BI or some additional tooling for BI."

"An area for improvement would be transactions, which can be tedious to complete as the process is very complex."

"The integration is a bit complex, and post-implementation support services need to be improved. They have a service center based out of Sri Lanka. The support aspect is good, but the response time is a little slower than we anticipated. In the next release, it would be better if Warehouse Management could be improvised. They have a product line that's a data warehouse management system, but it's still premature and requires a bit of enhancement."

"Ability to place approval check-points in the custom workflow, so clients can decide what they want it."

"I'm a business analyst, so I do a lot of customer-facing work. I take calls from businesses I have to troubleshoot. One thing that bugs me is the error messages you get from IFS. If I get an error message, I have to dig to find the cause because, often, the error message doesn't precisely describe the problem. It'll hint about where the problem lies, but you have to work to find the root cause. It doesn't help in my situation. You expect an error message to point to the field or what is causing the issue."

"The user interface can be improved. When you're clicking through the screens, there are some icons or symbols that really need updating and would be more useful and noticeable if they are aesthetically pleasing."

"Aspects of HR and payroll could be better."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

"The UI and UX need severe improvements."

"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."

"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."

"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."

"We pay for a license to use the solution, which is not very expensive."

"Ask for all-inclusive pricing, as they are pretty flexible if you ask for custom models."

"Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs."

"It is better to buy implementation services from IFS than from partners"

"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."

"The pricing of the solution may appear to be expensive for smaller companies with only tens of users; however, for larger and mid-size industrial companies, IFS is able to win deals and the pricing is competitive in the market."

"IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IFS Applications?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

I am not able to recall much about batch. Documentation-wise, they need more. There is not much available online, and the documentation availability is on the lower side compared to other products,...

What do you like most about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?

The product enables us to track our assets.

What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?

The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal.

What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?

I recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 9% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

IBM Maximo vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management

Compared 100% of the time

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Competitors

Product Reports

IFS Cloud Platform

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)

Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management product report

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management report

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

No data available

Overview

IFS is the world’s leading provider of Industrial AI and enterprise software for hardcore businesses that make, service, and power our planet. Our technology enables businesses which manufacture goods, maintain complex assets, and manage service-focused operations to unlock the transformative power of Industrial AI™ to enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Industrial AI is IFS.ai.

IFS Cloud is a fully composable AI-powered platform, designed for ultimate flexibility and adaptability to our customers’ specific requirements and business evolution. It spans the needs of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Information Technology Service Management (ITSM), and Field Service Management (FSM). IFS technology leverages AI, machine learning, real-time data and analytics to empower our customers to make informed strategic decisions and excel at their Moment of Service™.

IFS

Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management solution helps drive greater value from your assets, whether they are plants, facilities, or equipment. From capital planning and budgeting, to procurement and operations, to maintenance and repair. Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Capital Asset Management provides you with complete visibility into your assets. It gives you the information you need to make the financial and operational decisions that optimize equipment performance from deployment through operations, maintenance, and retirement. Capital Asset Management is fully integrated with other key JD Edwards EnterpriseOne applications, including those that support the management of human capital, finances, procurement, projects, and services and warranties.

Oracle

Sample Customers

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville

IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management