Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Maximo vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Maximo
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Billing Software (5th)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne As...
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of IBM Maximo is 15.4%, down from 27.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is 3.6%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Maximo15.4%
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management3.6%
Other81.0%
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Tajek Lawrence - PeerSpot reviewer
Digital Marketing Manager at UPS
Streamlined asset lifecycle management has reduced downtime and improves data‑driven decisions
IBM Maximo is my daily companion, and the software supports asset management. Using the software, we can monitor and optimize our system's performance and conduct predictive maintenance to prevent sudden downtime. The software is very robust and cost-effective.IBM Maximo is very well suited to asset lifecycle management and system condition monitoring. The product is user-friendly and effective in managing work orders. The software pricing is much more affordable than that of other EAM systems. The best features IBM Maximo offers in my experience include workflow, assets tracking, and integration with other apps. The software is very effective in trend analysis and downtime tracking and is well-suited for preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance. Additionally, it has ease of use and seamless integration with other tools such as M-Power, Omino, and IBM Maximo. The reporting feature is excellent, as it allows for order and job card updates. IBM Maximo has positively impacted my organization, as we have noticed significant advantageous changes. The use of the software has significantly improved operational efficiency in our organization by streamlining processes and preventing system failures. IBM Maximo has reduced unplanned downtime by enhancing preventive maintenance. The introduction of this product in our industry enabled data-driven decision making through real-time performance analytics and reporting. We have experienced specific outcomes, with fewer downtime instances of around ten percent. We have also experienced improved operational efficiency in our organization of approximately seventy percent.
RajneeshThamke - PeerSpot reviewer
program director at Birlasoft IndiaLtd.
Has supported tracking asset lifecycles with cost and maintenance visibility
The best feature is the ability to track the entire lifecycle from when the asset enters your organization until disposal. The entire lifecycle can be captured, including costs, depreciation, and any maintenance performed on the asset. All these costs can be tracked, which is the beauty of it. The advanced analytics and reporting tools are highly advanced. Because of the advent of AI technology, integrating it with AI will probably add much more value to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is configurable, where you can add extra fields to screens and to the database."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
"Provides great flexibility."
"Has a powerful audit combination that helps achieve high accuracy."
"We can manage, organize, and track incidents, claims, jobs, tasks, preventive and corrective maintenance, locations, and assets."
"The most powerful features are the database and integration with CMDB."
"Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met."
"The Preventive Maintenance feature, especially in its inspection routines and KPI abilities, is valuable."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
 

Cons

"Although you can create notifications with Maximo, the configuration and options could be improved."
"It needs full-service visibility. There are a lot of things that are hard for users to find out. For example, the Service Catalog is not too friendly. You really have to know what you're looking for."
"The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support."
"Revision management of file attachments."
"​Maximo is a big system, so the initial setup is complex."
"It's quite reliable, but new versions often are not too stable. They bring in enhancements but they break other stuff."
"It's not user-friendly. It could use shortcuts for frequently requested services."
"Areas for improvement include: an enhanced Service Catalog on Mobile; Agent intelligence; better dashboards for KPIs."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not know about the price of the solution. However, this has been an expensive project overall."
"IBM Maximo offers a licensing application, and you have to comply with the license."
"$USD700 per agent user."
"The price of IBM Maximo could reduce, it is expensive."
"Explore the possibility of using DB2. You will avoid the cost of SQL Server or Oracle licenses."
"The concurrent user license is much more effective in management and cost-wise, as it is more suitable for maintenance management."
"​Explore internal processes in order to evaluate the correct number of users in each Maximo module, then evaluate the different offers of pricing and licensing.​"
"IBM has changed the licensing policy. As I understand now, they are going from a complex way of licensing to a more simple way of licensing."
"The product is not expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
882,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Maximo?
IBM Maximo can be improved by providing developers with more documentation. I think IBM lacks a lot of documentation and hopefully the community who uses IBM Maximo can help if other developers hav...
What is your primary use case for IBM Maximo?
My main use case for IBM Maximo is as a technical consultant, so I help companies to use IBM Maximo. A quick, specific example of how I've helped a company use IBM Maximo is that it is quite generi...
What advice do you have for others considering IBM Maximo?
IBM Maximo in their last version includes mobility functionalities which can use the offline mode for technicians that do not have internet connection, and that is really helpful for them. Addition...
What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is very user-friendly to set up. It gives a lot of flexibility to make changes according to business needs.
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
This solution is primarily designed for mid-tier companies. While SAP is the most expensive option, those who cannot afford SAP normally opt for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management....
What is your primary use case for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
Any customer who has an asset-intensive business where lots of assets are involved needs a system. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management helps these businesses manage their assets eff...
 

Also Known As

Maximo
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast
Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
882,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.