Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Maximo vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Maximo
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Billing Software (4th)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne As...
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of IBM Maximo is 27.8%, up from 26.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is 2.6%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Jose Pedro Muñoz - PeerSpot reviewer
A very strong and powerful tool in the market preferred by a variety of industries
I rate the technical support a seven out of ten. Three levels of support in IBM. The first one is a fixed level, while levels two and three are very good. Here, level one is not very good, as it takes time to go from level one to level two and from level two to level three. So, level one is of low capacity.
IanCampbell - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides simple module navigation
The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is the ability to navigate through the module The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would. I have been using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is asset management maintenance as well as asset management overall."
"I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"The large range of configurability of the product is great, since everyone has a different way of doing things."
"We were doing all kinds of paperwork for every type of order and to maintain our assets but with the use of the IBM Maximo application, we can automate a lot of the processes."
"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to correct maintenance."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
 

Cons

"Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented."
"The latest version is slow due to the power it requires."
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is easy and one is difficult, I rate the setup process a two since it is very complicated."
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not. Sometimes it crashes or becomes very slow, and there are times we are not even able to download all the databases. Without the database, we cannot work on that application. These are the small glitches, and stability issues we are facing."
"Revision management of file attachments."
"The initial setup was complex, because it is a complex product."
"Areas for improvement include: an enhanced Service Catalog on Mobile; Agent intelligence; better dashboards for KPIs."
"It's quite reliable, but new versions often are not too stable. They bring in enhancements but they break other stuff."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of IBM Maximo could reduce, it is expensive."
"​Explore internal processes in order to evaluate the correct number of users in each Maximo module, then evaluate the different offers of pricing and licensing.​"
"Explore the possibility of using DB2. You will avoid the cost of SQL Server or Oracle licenses."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the pricing a nine. The price is very high."
"Where available, concurrent licenses can be more cost efficient and provide more flexibility."
"$USD700 per agent user."
"I do not know about the price of the solution. However, this has been an expensive project overall."
"IBM Maximo offers a licensing application, and you have to comply with the license."
"The product is not expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal.
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
I recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Maximo
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast
Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.