We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of IBM Maximo are the overall power and interface, and there are a lot of different modules that we use that are helpful. Additionally, it's an integrated solution and it has a lot of capabilities."
"Reliable, very configurable, and it's all integrated in the same database."
"The ability to configure and integrate it with other solutions for ERP."
"Maximo is very stable. We really do not have problem with stability."
"The large range of configurability of the product is great, since everyone has a different way of doing things."
"IBM Maximo is a very strong and powerful tool in the market…Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The Preventive Maintenance feature, especially in its inspection routines and KPI abilities, is valuable."
"The incident management feature is good because it allows you to keep track of and classify issues."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pros →
"You can get lost using the application"
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"Could use some alignment regarding some standards and the tracking of the IT assets. Even though they have all of the information (i.e. where are the assets, who owns the asset, etc.), they were not mapping it to different cyber standards."
"Maximo is a big system, so the initial setup is complex."
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is easy and one is difficult, I rate the setup process a two since it is very complicated."
"It was very slow due to the lagging issues. So that was kind of frustrating, considering how slow it was while functioning."
"It needs full-service visibility. There are a lot of things that are hard for users to find out. For example, the Service Catalog is not too friendly. You really have to know what you're looking for."
"Although you can create notifications with Maximo, the configuration and options could be improved."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Cons →
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 23 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is ranked 5th in Enterprise Asset Management with 4 reviews. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management writes "The product is reasonably priced and easy to set up, but the UI and UX need severe improvements". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, NetSuite ERP, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM and Corrigo Enterprise, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is most compared with . See our IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.