Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Trusteer vs InAuth vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of IBM Trusteer is 2.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InAuth is 0.6%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Fraud Management is 4.5%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAS Fraud Management4.5%
IBM Trusteer2.6%
InAuth0.6%
Other92.3%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

Olawale Ayuba - PeerSpot reviewer
AI and machine learning capabilities improve fraud management
For IBM Trusteer, one of the advantages is its AI and machine learning capabilities, which are very strong. The solution provides the ability to manage fraud in every session of a user, from login to logout of the user experience. It operates quickly and can intelligently cover a wide range of threats in the field. The Adaptive Authentication feature allows for frictionless operation for the user. Based on its AI intelligence and intelligence sets, it enables frictionless flow and only creates the need for further authentication based on what it has intelligently gathered about that session. Two different users will have different login experiences based on their history and behavioral analysis that tells the system whether to proceed with the transaction or pause it, protecting users from account takeovers or new account frauds. Integration is straightforward using JSON integration. It is easy to integrate with banking solutions or middleware solutions that financial institutions already have, both from the front end and back end. Whether it is a single-paged application or a multi-page application, there are different snippets and code bases for various types of integrations with back-end applications. IBM Trusteer captures customer ID and user ID at every session, enabling it to follow users through their journey through the banking application. It has its own real-time dashboard that allows fraud analysts to quickly make decisions about ongoing activities and determine whether to deny or allow transactions. It protects sensitive information of users through session and transaction-based monitoring, capturing CSID, customer ID, and user ID, enabling analysts to take swift, real-time action.
WN
Scalable and stable device identification and analysis solution for fraud detection, with reasonable pricing
I don't see anything that needs to be improved in InAuth currently. My advice to others who may want to use this solution is for them to use it with a Samsung device. InAuth works fine. Its features are working. I'm giving InAuth a rating of eight out of ten.
reviewer1562526 - PeerSpot reviewer
Scalable and easy to use but could have better technical support
The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable and the performance has been very good so far. That said, from my perspective, has had some issues with stability and performance issues in that they have a lot of data and it has some indexing and mechanisms that work a bit slow.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The features were pretty straightforward. I just used them as I went along with very little interference all the years that I have used it."
"InAuth is a stable and scalable solution that supports many devices and platforms such as Samsung, LG, etc. It also has very reasonable pricing."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The security is also very good."
 

Cons

"I would like them to make it as user-friendly as possible. Simplicity is what we need. Load and go."
"After a Windows update, it started acting up. It blocked several programs. It became inactive after the Windows update and I had to remove Trusteer, allowing my computer to go back to its norm."
"The initial setup for InAuth could be improved, as it's not straightforward. Weak connectivity issues and user-friendliness are also areas for improvement for this solution."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Pricing for this solution is reasonable."
"If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
868,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
45%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
6%
No data available
Financial Services Firm
24%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Trusteer?
The solution is somewhat expensive. IBM could improve their pricing structure. It comes with both licensing and profe...
What needs improvement with IBM Trusteer?
During integration, it is difficult to fully integrate within a specified time, primarily because code snippets must ...
What is your primary use case for IBM Trusteer?
IBM Trusteer is an anti-fraud solution that is used for account takeover fraud, new account fraud, account fraud, and...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Banco Satander
Bain Capital Ventures
Nets
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: August 2025.
868,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.