We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

IBM Safer Payments vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: January 2022.
566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
  • More SAS Fraud Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
    566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    We primarily use the solution for fraud prevention cases.
    Top Answer: 
    We are consultants and partners of SAS. I'm not sure if the version we are currently on is the latest version or not. In general, I would recommend the solution to other users or organizations. We've… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    841
    Comparisons
    581
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    837
    Comparisons
    620
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    558
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Adapt faster to changing threats and new products by dramatically shrinking the time it takes to test and deploy new profiles, rules, and models. Using a unique cognitive computing approach, IBM Safer Payments profiles the behavior of any entity and delivers best-fit analytics interactively to fraud professionals. This proven technology is already protecting some of the world's largest and most complex payment portfolios. Outthink fraud by rethinking detection.

    Respond faster to new threats. Reduce false positives for a better customer experience. SAS Fraud Management uses industry-leading data analytics and machine learning to monitor payments and nonmonetary transactions, as well as events, enabling you to identify and respond to unwanted and suspicious behavior in real time.

    Offer
    Learn more about IBM Safer Payments
    Learn more about SAS Fraud Management
    Sample Customers
    Borgun
    Nets
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company37%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Retailer5%
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: January 2022.
    566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Safer Payments is ranked 13th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 7th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 2 reviews. IBM Safer Payments is rated 0.0, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". IBM Safer Payments is most compared with IBM Trusteer, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, Fraud Hunting Platform and IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI), whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and BAE Systems NetReveal.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.