We performed a comparison between Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Riskified and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."
"It's a very good case management system."
"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."
"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data."
"The solution is easy to use."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."
"One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
Respond faster to new threats. Reduce false positives for a better customer experience. SAS Fraud Management uses industry-leading data analytics and machine learning to monitor payments and nonmonetary transactions, as well as events, enabling you to identify and respond to unwanted and suspicious behavior in real time.
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 2nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 4 reviews while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 9th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 7.6, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Offers robotics, machine learning, and enables us to reduce analysts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Scalable and easy to use but could have better technical support". Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, ThreatMetrix and IBM Trusteer, whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with IBM Safer Payments, FICO Falcon Platform, BioCatch and IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI).
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.