We performed a comparison between FICO Falcon Platform and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."FICO is working on a local model specifically for Brazil, whereas tools from Oracle and other vendors are only developed for general use. I haven't seen any other vendors who think like that until now."
"I've had bad experiences with FICO support. At the bank, we've faced critical problems where we only had minutes to find the solution, and it's hard to explain quickly. We contacted FICO, but they told us it was beyond their scope of support. They try to triage the call by asking us how much money we're losing, but I can't go into that."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
Earn 20 points
FICO Falcon Platform is ranked 3rd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 11th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. FICO Falcon Platform is rated 10.0, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of FICO Falcon Platform writes "It can set rules to identify suspicious activity at each point of sale during every transaction". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". FICO Falcon Platform is most compared with ThreatMetrix, IBM Safer Payments, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, ACI Fraud Management and Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with IBM Safer Payments, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.