Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Zephyr Enterprise comparison

IBM and SmartBear are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. IBM is ranked #24, while SmartBear is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.0. IBM holds a 1.4% mindshare in TMT, compared to SmartBear’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.
IBM Rational Performance Te...
Read 17 IBM Rational Performance Tester reviews
  • 628 Views
  • 119 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Zephyr Enterprise
Read 9 Zephyr Enterprise reviews
  • 1,356 Views
  • 1,153 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

IBM Rational Performance Tester and Zephyr Enterprise compete in the performance testing and test management market. IBM Rational Performance Tester seems to have the upper hand in comprehensive testing capabilities and detailed analytics, while Zephyr Enterprise stands out for seamless integration and user-friendly functionality.

Features: IBM Rational Performance Tester offers robust analytics, load testing capabilities, and comprehensive testing features, which are crucial for performance benchmarks. Zephyr Enterprise provides integration with various issue-tracking tools, agile project management features, and user-friendly functionality. Users find Zephyr Enterprise highly adaptable and IBM Rational Performance Tester superior in performance-specific metrics.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Performance Tester needs a more intuitive setup process, better support for complex environments, and enhanced usability. Zephyr Enterprise requires improved reporting features, better scalability options, and more technical depth.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Performance Tester has a complex deployment model that may challenge smaller teams but offers extensive support once set up. Zephyr Enterprise has a simpler deployment process and more accessible customer service, making it suitable for a broader range of users.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Performance Tester has higher initial setup costs but provides significant ROI through detailed analytics and performance insights. Zephyr Enterprise has competitive pricing and quick return on investment due to its ease of use and flexibility in agile environments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Zephyr Enterprise
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,825 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Performance Te...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
24th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zephyr Enterprise
Ranking in Test Management Tools
7th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Performance Tester is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zephyr Enterprise is 7.5%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil - PeerSpot reviewer
Supports web and mobile applications, very scalable, very stable, and wonderful support
There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies.
Read full review
PraveenKumar27 - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for test case management, but we faced some errors while uploading the test cases
We have used the product well. We use it for test case uploading. We created an Excel file and aligned the columns of the Excel file with the columns on the solution. It was a minimum guidance process. We can meet our requirements using the solution. We are able to do tasks without many errors. Overall, I rate the product a six or seven out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications, mobile applications, and software-based applications."
"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."
"It has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money."
"If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise."
"It has a very intuitive user experience."
"It has a very intuitive user experience."
"The solution does its job well."
"Zephyr Enterprise is a stable solution."
"We use the solution for test case management."
"It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management."
More Zephyr Enterprise pros
 

Cons

"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."
"There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies."
"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."
"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."
"It's difficult to export the test cases in Zephyr, especially with screenshots or attachments, making sharing test cases not very easy."
"Security needs improvement to protect customer information better."
"Creating better default varieties of reporting would make the product much better and more popular."
"The solution is not really stable. Sometimes in the past, some pages wouldn't load due to issues."
"We would like support for the agile and behavior-driven development (BDD) approaches."
"We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide such a utility."
More Zephyr Enterprise cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."
"DFS is more expensive than Zephyr. DFS is around $32 per person, whereas Zephyr is $10 per person. There is a major difference in the price, which is the main reason why we are trying to shift to Zephyr."
"It costs a couple of thousand dollars for a little more than 125 users, per month."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
14%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Zephyr Enterprise?
The solution does its job well.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Zephyr Enterprise?
Some areas for improvement, include its export capabilities. Exporting test cases, especially those with screenshots or attachments, can be cumbersome, hindering easy sharing and scalability.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Zephyr Enterprise?
I use it for test management within Jira.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Performance Tester Logo
Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Performance Tester
Compared 57% of the time
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs IBM Rational Performance Tester Logo
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs IBM Rational Performance Tester
Compared 26% of the time
Tricentis NeoLoad vs IBM Rational Performance Tester Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad vs IBM Rational Performance Tester
Compared 17% of the time
More IBM Rational Performance Tester Competitors
TestRail vs Zephyr Enterprise Logo
TestRail vs Zephyr Enterprise
Compared 22% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Tricentis qTest vs Zephyr Enterprise
Compared 21% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Zephyr Enterprise Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Zephyr Enterprise
Compared 18% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Zephyr Enterprise
Compared 16% of the time
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Zephyr Enterprise
Compared 10% of the time
More Zephyr Enterprise Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational Performance Tester
June 2025
IBM Rational Performance Tester reportDownload IBM Rational Performance Tester product report
Buyer's Guide
Zephyr Enterprise
June 2025
Zephyr Enterprise reportDownload Zephyr Enterprise product report
 

Also Known As

Rational Performance Tester
SmartBear Zephyr
 

Overview

IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.
IBM

Zephyr Enterprise is a robust enterprise test management platform that manages all aspects of the testing lifecycle. The solution is provided as an on-premise installation as well as a SaaS-based installation. Zephyr Enterprise enables you to make a rigid process flow flexible enough to accommodate changes. In addition, it provides all the functionality QA teams and testers need in order to create and execute test cases with less effort, allowing more time to do actual testing by alleviating significant time-wasting steps.

Zephyr Enterprise Features

Zephyr Enterprise has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

  • Visual dashboards
  • One-click integration
  • Multi Jira instance
  • Scalability
  • Third-Party Integrations
  • Reporting & Statistics
  • Data Import/Export
  • Data Visualization
  • User Management
  • Move & Copy
  • Software Testing Management
  • Requirements-Based Testing
  • Industry-strength scalability
  • Documented APIs
  • Regular maintenance and upgrades

Zephyr Enterprise Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Zephyr Enterprise. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

  • Ready-to-use reports and customizable dashboards: With Zephyr Enterprise, reports and dashboards are updated in real time and you can share test results and link with your team in Jira to connect any known issues. In addition, the solution helps you increase workflow efficiency because it improves info sharing during standup meetings.
  • Supports bi-directional and multi-instance Jira integration: Not only does Zephyr Enterprise support bi-directional and multi-instance Jira integration, but it also gives you the ability to support multiple projects simultaneously – up to 200,000 test cases.
  • Global repository for test cases: Zephyr Enterprise helps you create, categorize, and store your test cases via a global repository that can be shared across your entire organization. You can also quickly reuse test cases using the structured folder management.
  • Test execution: Zephyr Enterprise makes it possible for you to execute tests step by step, manage pass/fail status, and launch automated execution, then file those defects into Jira. Zephyr Enterprise test executions allow teams to operate in a more efficient way.

  • Universal test automation: Zephyr Enterprise supports a wide range of automation frameworks, helping you decrease operational costs and increase test coverage.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Zephyr Enterprise solution.

    A Manager of Enterprise Applications at a retailer says what’s most valuable is that “It's very easy and simple to use, which is beneficial. It has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money.” He also adds, “Zephyr Enterprise is very stable and the initial setup is straightforward.”

    Jawaad A., Test Automation Lead at Trapeze, explains, "It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management."
SmartBear
 

Sample Customers

andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
Hyundai, Fujitsu, Google, David Jones, Burger King, Ingenico, Websense, Dow Jones, Harris, Saab
Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Zephyr Enterprise
June 2025
Free Report: IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Zephyr Enterprise
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Zephyr Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Zephyr Enterprise report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.