Tricentis Tosca is a continuous testing platform that uses the industry’s most innovative functional testing technologies. Unlike traditional testing technologies, which are siloed and can allow for integration risks that are likely to derail end-to-end processes, Tricentis Tosca accelerates testing across the enterprise to keep pace with Agile and DevOps and helps enterprise teams to achieve 90%+ test automation rates, thereby enabling them to deliver fast and continuous feedback.
It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.
Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.
It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.
Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.
Apache JMeter is an open-source Java application that tests load and functional behavior and performance in applications. Created initially to test web applications, it has expanded its functionality to test other functions. For instance, you can test a server to see how efficiently it works and how many user requests can be handled simultaneously.
Free
This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.
Free
This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.
Selenium HQ is an umbrella project that includes a number of tools and frameworks that allow for web browser automation. In particular, Selenium offers a framework for the W3C WebDriver specification, a platform- and language-neutral coding interface that works with all of the main web browsers.
Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing.
It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license.
Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing.
It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license.
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.
I'd rate the pricing as 3/10 as it's very expensive.
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.
I'd rate the pricing as 3/10 as it's very expensive.
OpenText LoadRunner Professional is a performance testing tool used for various software applications, including web-related use cases, API testing, and enterprise performance modeling. Its valuable features include quick test case creation and execution, graph monitoring, multiple protocols, scripting and executing tests, scalability, easy setup, auto-correlation, analysis and reporting capabilities, stability, reliability, and compatibility with various programming languages.
The cost depends greatly on the needs of the testing engagement.
I would still consider LoadRunner as an expensive tool and you get a LoadRunner and the Performance Center.
The cost depends greatly on the needs of the testing engagement.
I would still consider LoadRunner as an expensive tool and you get a LoadRunner and the Performance Center.
Tricentis NeoLoad is a performance testing tool that provides developers and testers with automatic test design, test maintenance, realistic simulation of user behavior, fast root cause analysis, and built-in integrations with the entire SDLC toolchain. With NeoLoad’s plugins, teams can reuse and share test assets and results from functional testing tools, analytics, metrics, and APM tools in order to catch performance issues early. With NeoLoad’s full tech stack support, users can test the range of mobile, web, and desktop apps.
The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing.
Licence cost is very attractive compared to other vendor tools and also there are many license alternatives.
The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing.
Licence cost is very attractive compared to other vendor tools and also there are many license alternatives.
The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward.
There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use.
The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward.
There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use.
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.
We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee.
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.
We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee.
The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good.
It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis.
The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good.
It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis.
