We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and Oracle Enterprise Asset Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Oracle and others in Enterprise Asset Management."The incident management feature is good because it allows you to keep track of and classify issues."
"The most valuable feature is asset management maintenance as well as asset management overall."
"They have a real strength of tracking the asset itself along with the condition of the asset, the maintenance of the asset and who has access to the asset, etc."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
"IBM Maximo is a very strong and powerful tool in the market…Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We were able to scale perfectly."
"The ability to configure and integrate it with other solutions for ERP."
"Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met."
"The whole product is important and valuable to us."
"It's quite reliable, but new versions often are not too stable. They bring in enhancements but they break other stuff."
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"Areas for improvement include: an enhanced Service Catalog on Mobile; Agent intelligence; better dashboards for KPIs."
"The initial setup was complex, because it is a complex product."
"I feel that the interface is a little too complicated with a large number of fields to enter."
"The mobile solution has a lot of room for improvement, especially in geopositioning capabilities, tracking capabilities, and configuration capabilities, in order to let the tech operate online and offline."
"Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented."
"The product is not user-friendly."
More Oracle Enterprise Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 23 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Asset Management with 1 review. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Asset Management writes "The product is not user-friendly, and it is very expensive, though it is highly stable". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, NetSuite ERP, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM and Coupa Invoice, whereas Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is most compared with ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.