IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform vs Infor CloudSuite comparison

IBM and IFS are both solutions in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category. IBM is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while IFS is ranked #3 with an average rating of 6.5. IBM holds a 11.9% mindshare in EAM, compared to IFS’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of IFS users who would recommend it.

IBM Maximo

Read 32 IBM Maximo reviews

6,086 Views
2,800 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

IFS Cloud Platform

Read 32 IFS Cloud Platform reviews

10,280 Views
1,234 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Infor CloudSuite

Read 19 Infor CloudSuite reviews

8,051 Views
1,208 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Maximo

IFS Cloud Platform

Infor CloudSuite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo, IFS Cloud Platform, and Infor CloudSuite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Infor, IFS and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM).

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of IBM Maximo is 11.9%, down from 28.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 6.5%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infor CloudSuite is 6.3%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Maximo	11.9%
Infor CloudSuite	6.3%
IFS Cloud Platform	6.5%
Other	75.3%

Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)

Featured Reviews

Antony Mishra

Java Software Engineer at GPA

Asset management has become streamlined and decision-making is now driven by lifecycle data

The best features IBM Maximo offers are that it is very simple to deploy on OpenShift using Ansible playbooks. It also has excellent support for integration, is simple to configure, and the asset register is very straightforward. Work management and managing inventory are seamless. In terms of integration support, I have used preventive maintenance, work generation, accurate work execution planning, tracking actuals, and I can easily integrate with other tools and systems. IBM Maximo Suite gives me a single place where service cycles are standardized and tied to compliance. IBM Maximo has positively impacted my organization as it has been a very useful tool. It reduced human error by moving away from pen and paper-based scheduling. It saved cost by minimizing unexpected downtime of assets, with approximately 50% of time being saved. We have also reduced overwork among staff by removing redundant information and smoothing task flows. It helps us scale our team without micromanaging small issues.

Read full review

reviewer2268153

Cloud Operations Engineer

Integrated planning has improved production scheduling and now reduces downtime and costs

The biggest friction point I have run into with IFS Cloud Platform is user adoption, which has been the biggest challenge, as different users in the organization need to get accustomed to the new processes after years of using spreadsheets and legacy systems, requiring training and a mindset shift, along with challenging data migration and process standardization. My advice to someone considering IFS Cloud Platform with a similar workflow is to spend sufficient time understanding and standardizing their business processes before implementing it, as the technology is very powerful, but the real value comes when processes, data, and teams are all aligned. I would rate my overall experience with IFS Cloud Platform as a 9 out of 10.

Read full review

Adeel Ansari

Project Manager, Program at SPTLabtech

Integrated planning has improved document automation but reporting and user experience still need work

There are areas where Infor CloudSuite can improve. I have touched on the pros and key strengths of Infor CloudSuite, but end-user feedback indicates that there are several areas where the user experience can improve. For instance, when it comes to reporting, it comes with a very limited number of reports, and the standard reports are clunky, requiring a technical resource or developer to enhance or make them presentable. Another area is user experience; it takes several clicks to get to the information, and the user interface isn't that intuitive. Compared to other solutions, such as top-tier options such as Oracle or SAP, this stands out as an area needing improvement. When it comes to integration, Infor CloudSuite does offer a great deal of flexibility. It comes with APIs, so you can integrate with any third-party systems you may use. On that front, it's sufficient; however, it does require some specialized resources, as it's not a layman's job, and developers need to help with the integration. This is generally the case for any ERP. The user interface could indeed be better, and there is a steep learning curve for users; it takes time for them to get accustomed to Infor CloudSuite's interface and forms. However, once users adapt, it becomes easier and smoother to navigate. There are great features associated with Infor CloudSuite, such as DataViews and Birst as a business intelligence tool, which can be integrated with the basic product. Implementing Birst isn't plug-and-play; it requires a team of technical resources to execute. Additionally, there is a feature that allows integration with Excel, which can be installed by your IT team.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The incident management feature is good because it allows you to keep track of and classify issues."

"When we integrated the Maximo DB with the BI tool, we were able to track and manage the inventory levels in a much more controllable way, and reduced the inventory levels significantly within one year."

"The most powerful features are the database and integration with CMDB."

"With Maximo, we can manage, organize, and track incidents, claims, jobs, tasks, preventive and corrective maintenance, locations, and assets."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to correct maintenance."

"IBM Maximo has positively impacted my organization as it has been a very useful tool, reducing human error by moving away from pen and paper-based scheduling, saving cost by minimizing unexpected downtime of assets with approximately 50% of time being saved, and reducing overwork among staff by removing redundant information and smoothing task flows."

"The Preventive Maintenance feature, especially in its inspection routines and KPI abilities, is valuable."

"When it comes to their reporting and analytics capabilities, I find them to be superb."

More IBM Maximo pros

"What I like about IFS Applications is that it's easier to use and implement than SAP. I also like that the IFS Applications team is more flexible than the SAP team."

"The most valuable feature to us was the capability to quickly identify the tickets we have open with people and follow up them."

"IFS Applications is very user-friendly and easy to deploy, and it's suitable for small and medium enterprises."

"When it comes to financing, the solution has helped us to concentrate finance functions like accounting processes in one system. This includes about 70 internal entities around the world."

"A high level of ERP can be handled in IFS."

"The most valuable features of IFS Applications are their intuitiveness and ease of use. The navigations are also straightforward, which makes it easy to train users. The feedback I always receive is that it is very user-friendly."

"All the modules are valuable in their own right, but everything has to go through the ERP. IFS has done an excellent job integrating the various modules to complete these processes. My expertise is in the finance module, but I have used the other verticals. It's an all-around good product."

"The enterprise management solutions within the solution are very strong."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

"Mainly, we pushed back a $7M plant expansion because we were able to increase throughput with our existing facility."

"The solution is particularly effective for ERP. The automation of emails is a valuable feature for me. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. Infor CloudSuite Industrial is better for its development aspect. It allows us to customize and implement changes more efficiently. The initial setup was straightforward. I recommend the solution."

"It is a complete wave management system to increase processing efficiency."

"Infor CloudSuite Industrial is easy to setup. The built-in solution is already there, so we can start implementing it right away when we install it in an organization. After going through different test executions and workshops, any missing features can be added using Infor extension tables and other products. It will take at least eight to nine months to go live."

"From a product perspective, it's more lenient and suitable for using features in finance, such as reconciling our payments, accounts payable, accounts receivable, etc."

"The customization capabilities of CloudSuite Industrial are also there."

"Some valuable features include improved transparency in sales processes, which has been vital for our operations."

"Workflow management and collaboration tools enhance operations and facilitate seamless interaction among departments."

More Infor CloudSuite pros

Cons

"Vendor management needs enhancement."

"One way IBM Maximo can be improved is that the interface is not modern or particularly user-friendly."

"This solution could improve by integrating or embedding finances, charts of accounts, and invoicing."

"IBM is a big company and they have a lot of products. Level One, the first level of tech support, is the one that is used to stop the tsunami. For everyone, it's always work to get past that."

"IBM Maximo is similar to an ARP. Because it's so massive, you can easily get lost using the application."

"Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented."

"The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support."

"Because of their competitiveness and their enterprise nature, the small companies are unable to do it."

More IBM Maximo cons

"The integration is a bit complex, and post-implementation support services need to be improved."

"Customization can only be done by IFS and not by the clients themselves."

"The customer service is not good as expected but we can say its fair."

"The support provided by IFS Applications has room for improvement. I'm based in Poland, and when my company had an issue, finding people from IFS to give my company the support it needed was difficult."

"We have had an issue that we don't get proper after-sale service when we get technical glitches."

"The product requires heavy administrative work."

"An area for improvement would be transactions, which can be tedious to complete as the process is very complex."

"IFS uses Crystal Report mostly, which isn't too user-friendly. Developing reports isn't easy and requires a lot of dev time. Since SAP bought it, Crystal Report has become more complicated to use on IFS. You have a dashboard for reporting that is good, but it's incomplete. Most of our clients use Power BI or some additional tooling for BI."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

"There are areas where Infor CloudSuite can improve. For instance, when it comes to reporting, it comes with a very limited number of reports, and the standard reports are clunky, requiring a technical resource or developer to enhance or make them presentable."

"Regarding integration, specific third-party tools are not accepted, for example, on the old version of IBM or Oracle."

"There should be better clarity and agreement on all interfaces and requirements before signing a contract. This would avoid unexpected costs and complications later on."

"It takes time to properly learn what the product can do."

"The platform's distribution features need enhancement."

"Infor OS is powerful, but the documentation is terrible."

"The price of the solution is not good."

"In Germany, there aren't enough IT specialists for customization and software development, causing projects to take too long."

More Infor CloudSuite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"$USD700 per agent user."

"Explore internal processes in order to evaluate the correct number of users in each Maximo module, then evaluate the different offers of pricing and licensing."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the pricing a nine. The price is very high."

"Where available, concurrent licenses can be more cost efficient and provide more flexibility."

"IBM has changed the licensing policy. As I understand now, they are going from a complex way of licensing to a more simple way of licensing."

"You pay for what you get. There are lots of options depending on how you would like to implement Maximo."

"The price of IBM Maximo could reduce, it is expensive."

"IBM Maximo offers a licensing application, and you have to comply with the license."

More IBM Maximo pricing and cost advice

"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."

"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."

"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The pricing of the solution may appear to be expensive for smaller companies with only tens of users; however, for larger and mid-size industrial companies, IFS is able to win deals and the pricing is competitive in the market."

"The additional cost that comes with the solution includes the overhead of the people who are trying to fix the tool issues. These people are trying to reproduce the issue and report it to the technical support and testing with them which is huge. It is the cost of quality in the end."

"IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."

"I consider it to be a well-priced solution compared to other mid-range or high-end ERP solutions."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

"The platform's pricing depends on the specific number of users."

"For on-premise installations, the licensing is yearly."

"The pricing is not built on a standard model."

"The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"I feel it is not very cheap, very economical but also not very expensive."

"As for pricing, I secured a favorable deal at around $80,000 yearly for five years, but it was a one-time opportunity."

"I'm working for a German company, but I'm located in Portugal. In the German market, Infor's price isn't an issue for clients, but Infor is losing market share every year to SAP in Portugal. Portuguese clients find SAP more affordable. Infor needs to work on this."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

11%

Healthcare Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Maximo?

The only thing that I need from IBM Maximo is more simplicity. The application has been designed in a way that it is ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Maximo?

There are different use cases for IBM Maximo that I work with mostly. We use it for complete asset management. Anythi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Maximo?

AWS is more recommended for IBM Maximo. You can go into Microsoft as well, but AWS is preferred. IBM also has their o...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive featur...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

When it comes to AI, I feel that is the area where we expect something more from IFS Cloud Platform. They are working...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IFS Applications?

Currently, I am working with Arcwide, which is a service industry that predominantly focuses on IFS consulting, inclu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor CloudSuite CRM?

Infor CloudSuite is cheaper than SAP and the license is on a yearly basis.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor CloudSuite CRM?

There are areas where Infor CloudSuite can improve. I have touched on the pros and key strengths of Infor CloudSuite,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor CloudSuite CRM?

I can highlight a couple of other scenarios regarding my main use case or how I've implemented Infor CloudSuite. One ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ServiceNow vs IBM Maximo

Compared 34% of the time

Hexagon EAM vs IBM Maximo

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Asset Management vs IBM Maximo

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Asset Performance Management vs IBM Maximo

Compared 4% of the time

ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM vs IBM Maximo

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Maximo Competitors

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 4% of the time

IFS assyst vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 3% of the time

ServiceNow vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Zendesk vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

Infor LN vs Infor CloudSuite

Compared 4% of the time

Infor M3 vs Infor CloudSuite

Compared 4% of the time

Workday vs Infor CloudSuite

Compared 4% of the time

SAP SuccessFactors HCM vs Infor CloudSuite

Compared 3% of the time

Salesforce Sales Cloud vs Infor CloudSuite

Compared 3% of the time

More Infor CloudSuite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Maximo

June 2026

Download IBM Maximo product report

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform

June 2026

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Infor CloudSuite

June 2026

Download Infor CloudSuite product report

Also Known As

Maximo

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

SyteLine

Overview

IBM Maximo offers advanced asset management with preventive maintenance, asset tracking, and integration capabilities. Its flexibility boosts efficiency and reduces downtime.

Known for its robust asset lifecycle management, IBM Maximo integrates with financial platforms and IoT data sources. It supports maintenance management, process digitization, and inventory purchasing, proving ideal for industries like manufacturing and energy. Users find its predictive maintenance and central asset management key to cost reduction and efficiency.

What are the most important features of IBM Maximo?

Preventive Maintenance: Optimize asset uptime through scheduled tasks and checks.
Asset Tracking: Monitor and manage assets across locations and systems.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connect with financial platforms and IoT sources.
Predictive Maintenance: Anticipate potential failures to minimize downtime.
Comprehensive Reporting: Gain insights through detailed analytics and reports.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Downtime: Efficient maintenance and asset tracking reduce productivity losses.
Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Configurability and integration streamline processes.
Cost Savings: Preventive strategies and predictive analytics cut operational expenses.
Agnostic Integration: Easily adapts to existing systems for smooth operations.
Ease of Use: Intuitive interface supports quick adoption and implementation.

IBM Maximo is widely adopted in manufacturing, telecommunications, and energy sectors, excelling in asset lifecycle management and maintenance processes. Industries enhance efficiency with its centralized management, predictive maintenance, and improved information sharing, aligning operations with comprehensive asset strategies.

IBM

IFS Cloud Platform offers a modern, adaptable enterprise management tool with a user-friendly design, providing seamless integration and customizable modules for efficient operations.

IFS Cloud Platform streamlines enterprise processes through its cloud-based architecture, favoring adaptability and swift updates. It supports industry standards and offers deep analytics and flexible customization, benefiting industries like aerospace, defense, and manufacturing. Despite needing enhancements in documentation, mobile compatibility, and reporting tools, it remains a viable choice for comprehensive ERP applications in finance, HR, and supply chain management. Integration with systems such as Azure and NetSuite further optimizes manufacturing schedules.

What are the key features of IFS Cloud Platform?

Modern Design: Offers an intuitive interface.
REST APIs: Enables seamless integration.
Customizable Modules: Enhances finance and service management.
Analytics: Provides deep insights into operations.
Cloud-Based: Ensures quick updates and adaptability.
Industry Standards: Supports service-oriented architecture.

What benefits or ROI should be considered in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines enterprise management.
Enhanced Connectivity: Facilitates system integration.
Flexibility: Customizable to business needs.
Improved Operations: Optimizes schedules and resources.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive in enterprise solutions.

In aerospace and defense, IFS Cloud Platform assists with planning and scheduling, while in manufacturing, it manages inventory and service management efficiently. Companies implement it for ERP applications across finance, HR, and supply chain, integrating with Azure and NetSuite to enhance IT service management and project-based scenarios, leveraging its AI-driven PSO component.

IFS

Infor CloudSuite provides robust ERP and manufacturing features, seamless Microsoft integration, and automation of document management. It enhances compliance, scalability, and visibility, supporting industrial applications for planning and efficient IT management.

Infor CloudSuite offers an integrated suite that automates key business processes while providing advanced scheduling and analytics tools. The interface simplifies usage, while the strong planning and BOM management enhance operational efficiencies. Its cloud-based architecture minimizes IT overheads, supports global operations, and caters to discrete manufacturing needs. However, there are areas for improvement such as documentation, integration, reporting capabilities, and customization challenges. Users also note pricing concerns, particularly in certain regions, alongside the need for better resource availability, enhanced service, and industry-specific functionalities.

What features make Infor CloudSuite stand out?

ERP and Manufacturing: Comprehensive tools for effective manufacturing operations and ERP tasks.
Microsoft Integration: Seamless use with Microsoft tools enhances productivity.
Document Automation: Efficient document management through automation.
Analytics Dashboards: In-depth insights provided by robust analytics tools.
Planning and BOM Management: Strong industrial planning and BOM support.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Scalability: Supports growth and adaptation to changing business needs.
International Operations: Facilitates global business processes and communication.
Reduced IT Overheads: Cloud-based structure cuts down IT infrastructure costs.
Compliance and Visibility: Enhances regulatory compliance and operational transparency.

Infor CloudSuite is deployed across industries like industrial engineering, retail, aviation, automotive, electronics, and logistics. It supports activities such as discrete manufacturing, bookkeeping, warehousing, and ERP tasks. Companies benefit from its capabilities to handle production, subcontracting, CRM, invoicing, and supply chain management, making it highly flexible and capable of addressing industry-specific demands.

Infor

Sample Customers

Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

PRIDE Industries

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Infor, IFS and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.