


Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
I have been able to see a return on investment as the time for approvals has been reduced, and since they are centralized, everything is in one place.
ROI may be very short if you use OpenText Content Management system effectively.
Time spent searching for documents has reduced significantly, and I saw a noticeable drop in duplicate or outdated documents, speeding up the search system by more than thirty to forty percent.
Huge amount of time is saved. Especially from my own personal experience, I can tell you that SharePoint usage saves me an average of one and a half hours per day.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
I would describe the customer service and technical support of Hyland OnBase as being based on the partner that is used.
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
The staff lacks adequate knowledge.
Currently, they are improving support and transitioning to a new solution, which is better than what they implemented in the past three to four years.
There is a lack of detailed and timely responses, and support is not always transparent with the solutions.
The quality of Microsoft's technical support is very high.
It's also difficult sometimes to get the right information because we speak at first to a generalist and they have to go to a specialist.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
There is not enough documentation about scaling, which makes it difficult to enhance or modify environments without significant effort.
We have had new teams developed within our organization, and SharePoint has scaled to accommodate them without any issues.
Making it easy to scale from a load-balancing and infrastructure perspective.
SharePoint is massively scalable and I would rate it as 8.5 out of ten.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
The product is quite stable if it is well-managed.
From my experience, it offers high availability and reliability, and I have not faced any major downtime issues.
I have never once experienced a downtime on SharePoint whereby we come and say files are not accessible because the SharePoint server is down.
The stability of SharePoint is high; it is quite stable and resilient.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns.
The experience with the platform's learning curve is quite steep, especially for less technical staff.
The expectation from the customer versus the product explanation needs alignment.
Another important aspect is the improvement of the artificial intelligence already embedded in OpenText Content Management solution.
Microsoft forces users to upgrade their license to access proper auditing information, which is essential and should be included in any license.
The rights management aspect can be particularly challenging, which may affect the overall user-friendliness of the product.
Expansion of scalability is needed, specifically the threshold limits for site items should be increased beyond the current 5,000 items.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.
If you compare it to an archiving solution and you are using content management only for archiving, the cost of the license may seem too high, as you are paying for a license that not only includes archiving but also controls the full life cycle of information, connects with SAP and Salesforce, features a native connection with Office 365, and supports parallel editing.
The cost is a significant factor that may deter medium-sized businesses from using OpenText extended ECM.
Unlike Drupal, all necessary applications are included in the Microsoft license, making it cost-effective.
Microsoft offers bundled pricing for Office, SharePoint, and Exchange, making it cost-effective.
Enterprise licensing is generally cost-effective compared to individual purchases.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes.
Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality.
The seamless integration between SAP and OpenText offers a 360-degree view of documents, facilitating a full-text search capability.
OpenText Content Management has a feature that is unique in the market, which is the deep integration with leading applications, allowing reflection of the connections between different processes and objects in applications such as SAP, SuccessFactors, or Salesforce, visible inside the document management application.
Additionally, SharePoint acts as a version control system, allowing easy recovery of past document versions.
Its rights management capabilities and ability to restrict access to certain people are also very useful.
The most valuable feature of SharePoint is the ability to collaborate on documents without having multiple versions.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SharePoint | 11.7% |
| Hyland OnBase | 5.1% |
| OpenText Content Management | 6.3% |
| Other | 76.9% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 81 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 40 |
| Large Enterprise | 83 |
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
OpenText Content Management offers seamless document storage and advanced search features. Ideal for organizations needing integration with SAP and other applications, it enhances workflows while ensuring security and compliance across multiple platforms.
OpenText Content Management stands out with its advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connectivity with SAP and other applications. Its enhanced security and permission systems safeguard information, vital for industries like banking, utilities, and oil & gas. Metadata categorization and customizable workflows aid in managing complex document lifecycles. Although improvements in visibility and integration with external tools are needed, the platform provides powerful collaboration tools, enhancing productivity. Users leverage document retention and WebReports features to ensure compliance. Challenges with support, performance during peak times, and architecture complexity are noted. Automation features and analytics require enhancement, alongside more user-friendly SmartUI and record management functionalities.
What key features define OpenText Content Management?OpenText Content Management is widely utilized in sectors such as banking, utilities, and oil & gas. It is implemented to manage software development projects, engineering documents, and workflow automation. Organizations leverage OpenText Extended ECM for document lifecycle management, post-project archiving, and records retention. Integration with platforms like ServiceNow allows efficient handling of document management across global operations, supporting information governance, tax return compilation, and capital projects.
SharePoint offers document management, collaboration, and Microsoft Office integration, with a user-friendly interface supporting workflows and customization. Organizations benefit from centralized content storage, improving team coordination and efficiency.
SharePoint is tailored for document and content management, offering collaboration tools, workflow automation, and integration with Microsoft products. It supports robust search, metadata tagging, and access control. While performance and the interface require enhancements, it remains a valuable tool for organizations managing internal and external communications. Integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive facilitates collaboration, and SharePoint's centralized repositories and document storage enhance team efficiency. Power Platform integration allows for quick data handling and automation, boosting productivity.
What Are the Most Notable Features of SharePoint?In various industries, SharePoint is used for document and content management, supporting specific department sites and internal communications. It facilitates automation and policy management while offering integration with Microsoft Teams and OneDrive for improved collaboration and geographical team coordination.