Hyland OnBase vs Microsoft Power Apps comparison

Hyland and Microsoft are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.7, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Hyland holds a 0.9% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Microsoft’s 15.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

442 Views
10 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Power Apps

Read 94 Microsoft Power Apps reviews

12,689 Views
1,351 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Microsoft Power Apps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Hyland OnBase and Microsoft Power Apps are competing in the automation and integration category. Microsoft Power Apps seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and robust integration capabilities.

Features: Hyland OnBase is valued for document management, workflow automation, and integration, focusing on organizational efficiency for enterprises. Microsoft Power Apps stands out in custom application creation due to its simplicity and integration into Microsoft's ecosystem, making it truly adaptable and customizable.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase could enhance flexibility and expand its deployment options. It might also focus on boosting integration capabilities beyond its current offerings. Marketing strategies to compete on the same level as major tech ecosystems could be beneficial. Microsoft Power Apps, on the other hand, can improve its pricing transparency and support options. It also has room to enhance non-Microsoft integration to attract a wider audience. Lastly, providing more offline capabilities could increase its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase is easy to deploy but lacks the flexibility offered by Microsoft Power Apps, which benefits from globally integrated platforms and exceptional customer support, making its deployment faster and more user-friendly.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase provides a predictable pricing model which suits organizations seeking pricing stability, delivering agreeable long-term returns. Microsoft Power Apps, though potentially higher in initial cost, offers substantial ROI through its flexible and broad capabilities, which enhance business processes, hence making it a worthwhile investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Microsoft Power Apps Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Microsoft Power Apps

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (17th), Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Microsoft Power Apps

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Power Apps is 15.6%, down from 24.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Srinivas Rao Kagitha

Senior Onbase Developer & Administrator at HTC Global Services (INDIA) Private

Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features

The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.

Read full review

Guhan Eshwar

Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Building tools with user-friendly interfaces abut needs integration improvements

An integration of Copilot options within Microsoft Power Apps would be useful. In UiPath apps, there is an autopilot function that uses a generative AI model, which creates layouts and connects data services automatically with a prompt. Such integration would be beneficial to build basic frameworks that can be enhanced. This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"It's very easy to build an app using this solution."

"I have found the technical support to be helpful."

"It uses a lot of AI, which is helpful, especially during the setup process."

"The solution's most valuable feature revolves around its low code capabilities. Coding work is less in the tool."

"The most valuable feature is the compatibility with other Microsoft components."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Model-driven or Canvas application-making platforms. The power of the two gives us exactly what we are looking for."

"Power Apps facilitates form creation, application planning, and automation. We have encountered scenarios where automation was crucial, such as managing emails according to SOPs and handling basic ERP tasks like user password changes and role assignments"

"The most valuable feature is the completeness of the concept. It is not restricted by where you are allowed to use it and that is its greatest strength."

More Microsoft Power Apps pros

Cons

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"The migration is a bit difficult in the tool."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"You can't add too many filters onto anything you build, otherwise, it will be very slow and it will affect your performance."

"The documentation isn't great. It's only 75% of what you need to know. If you go beyond that and run into issues, it's really not going to help you."

"PowerApps can't do a lot of things that users need now. For example, it can't handle signatures."

"An integration of Copilot options within Microsoft Power Apps would be useful."

"The pricing structure needs to be improved, the current information is confusing."

"I have heard from developers that there is documentation missing in the reporting."

"I would like to have more options for changing the layout because customizing something as simple as colors is very hard."

"The solution's deployment is complex."

More Microsoft Power Apps cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The tool's price is high."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"There are areas of Microsoft PowerApps that can be improved. For example, the license policies are expensive to purchases the premium connectors. If a company would like to use the premium features, they have to pay a lot of money. The Microsoft PowerApps portal could be easier to use when there are a lot of external users because if a company has 1,000 external users, it is too expensive to use the Microsoft PowerApps portal."

"Usually, the free licenses of Power Apps come to normal corporate users for free...For normal users within a corporate firm with licenses, it's totally favorable."

"The platform's pricing is reasonable."

"For me, it was free to develop with a professional license, which is about 70 euros a month."

"I pay nine dollars monthly for the subscription to this solution and the price of the is reasonable."

"This is not an expensive product and there are no licensing fees."

"Microsoft Power Apps is not an expensive solution."

"My company has non-profit licensing, and hence, it is affordable. Pricing depends on usage."

More Microsoft Power Apps pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?

The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...

See all answers

How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?

I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...

See all answers

Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?

Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...

See all answers

Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?

Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Documentum vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 14% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 12% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 4% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

ServiceNow vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure App Service vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 9% of the time

Appian vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 7% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Power Apps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

June 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Power Apps

May 2025

Download Microsoft Power Apps product report

Also Known As

OnBase

PowerApps, MS PowerApps

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Microsoft Power Apps is a rapid application development software and low-code development platform. The solution consists of a suite of apps, services, connectors, and a data platform. It provides an environment for building custom apps which is suitable for different businesses.

Microsoft Power Apps allows users to not only build applications, but also connect them to Microsoft's other sources, including the underlying data platform Microsoft Dataverse, as well as online and on-premise sources such as SharePoint, Dynamics 365, and Microsoft 365. The applications built using Microsoft Power Apps have a responsive design that makes them suitable for work in browsers and on mobile applications on different devices.

The no-code side of the product makes it suitable for complete beginners to app building, allowing them to easily create fully functional applications with many features. The solution also has a specialized platform for developers where specialists can access data and metadata, create custom connectors, integrate with external data, and apply business logic. The solution allows users to create three types of apps: canvas, model-driven, and portal. They are made using:

Power Apps Studio: Canvas apps are designed through Power Apps Studio. This app designer is suitable for complete beginners, as the app creation process resembles the building of presentations in Microsoft PowerPoint.
App Designer: Model-driven apps are created through App Designer. The creation process allows users to define the sitemap and add components to build the application.
Power Apps Portals Studio: This is a What You See Is What You Get (WYSIWYG) design tool. It is suitable for portal applications, as it allows users to add and configure web pages, forms, components, and lists.

Microsoft Power Apps Features

The three different design tools of the solution, Power Apps Studio, App Designer, and Power Apps Portals Studio, come with various features which allow users to utilize the tools. Some of these features include:

Common Data Service (CDS): The data storage feature of the solution allows users to store and manage the data used for business applications securely. The data within the feature is stored among a set of entities, including a base set of standard entities as well as user-made custom ones, using Power Query. The data within CDS can be used to build apps.
Cloud connectivity: Microsoft Power Apps has the ability to connect with various types of cloud services. It can connect with MS CDS, as well as SQL, DropBox, and Google Drive.
Sharing feature: The tool has a feature for sharing built applications. Users can share the app they have created with users within the same organization as them.
Role-based feature: The product allows organizations to assign their employees roles within the platform. This is done to create customization based on the assigned roles, potentially eliminating issues that a completely free access can create.
AI automation: The tool has a feature that utilizes artificial intelligence (AI). It provides users with an AI builder and pre-built AI components to facilitate the application building process.
APIs feature: Microsoft Power Apps facilitates the app-building process through application program interfaces (APIs).
Collaboration support: The tool supports collaboration within the organization in the application building process. Through this feature, multiple employees can contribute to the creation of an app.

Microsoft Power Apps Benefits

The product brings various benefits to organizations and individuals who utilize it. Some of the biggest advantages of Microsoft Power Apps include:

The solution saves time for organizations by eliminating manual coding and providing ready-to-use solutions.
Applications built on the product can be made compatible with various platforms, including the web, Windows, Android, and iOS.
The premium connectors and wide integration of the platform allow developers to use data from Microsoft and from third-party services to build their applications.
The no-code capability enhances mobility and innovations within companies.
The AI feature of the product allows companies to increase their productivity through prebuilt AI scenarios.
The tool offers various ways to follow the data from the created applications, allowing companies to benefit from the reports of the performance of their apps.
Professional developers receive a platform to follow crucial metrics and access the application development in detail.
Power Apps can be connected across the entire Microsoft Power Platform, allowing organizations to utilize all features that the provider offers.

Reviews from Real Users

An IT Specialist (INFOSEC) at a government appreciates this tool because it is low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower.

Rafael T., a data engineer at NTT Security, likes Microsoft Power Apps, because it is great for making apps quickly, has helpful support, and integrates with Power BI.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Microsoft Power Apps

June 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Microsoft Power Apps

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Microsoft Power Apps and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.