Hyland OnBase vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

Hyland and Jitterbit are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.6, while Jitterbit is ranked #24. Hyland holds a 2.4% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Jitterbit’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jitterbit users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

4,371 Views
962 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Vinyl

Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews

1,360 Views
925 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Jitterbit Vinyl

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and Jitterbit Vinyl compete in the enterprise software solutions category. Hyland OnBase has advantages in pricing and support, while Jitterbit Vinyl is noted for its exceptional features.

Features: Hyland OnBase has strong document management, workflow capabilities, and reasonable pricing. Jitterbit Vinyl offers powerful integration features, ease of use, and advanced integration solutions for enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase needs better mobile access, simplified user training, and improved user support. Jitterbit Vinyl requires better error handling, more extensive documentation, and enhancements in user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase has straightforward deployment but mixed customer service reviews. Jitterbit Vinyl offers simple deployment and superior customer support, leading in both areas.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase is valued for reasonable setup costs and good ROI. Jitterbit Vinyl has higher setup costs but provides strong ROI due to its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (15th), Enterprise Content Management (6th)

Jitterbit Vinyl

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

24th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (27th), No-Code Development Platforms (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 2.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Hyland OnBase	2.4%
Jitterbit Vinyl	1.3%
Other	96.3%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Seamless data management enhances security while monolithic architecture and reporting need improvements

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns. Additionally, there could be more integration points with products Hyland has acquired, such as Alfresco and Nuxeo. Offering a trial version with basic features would allow users to experience the product before purchasing. I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.

Read full review

reviewer2208660

Mobile Dog Product Manager at BioPet Laboratories

It has sped up the app development process, enabling us to release a public version of the app much quicker

Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"VINYL has given us the ability to really improve the speed with which we deploy releases and respond to the good ideas that our people have."

"The integration is a huge accelerator into enabling new business processes. As a small company, we have a few different systems that otherwise couldn't talk to each other. We recognize, from an IT perspective, the value that data and change in status of certain data in one area could influence the ability to take action in another. With these integration points, we are able to essentially create that communication from one system to another, letting system B know that something has been completed or is ready in system A. That allows our users to know that they are ready to complete a task. Without that, we would be relying on a lot of manual communication. We would be relying on individuals sending emails, saying, "Hey, by the way, this is ready in system A." Now, we have the system recognizing it and shooting that email off automatically, with all the instructions necessary."

"Maintenance is very minimal. With our live production applications, they just don't break, which is great. We love that. There's zero-to-little maintenance required."

"The product is super fast at getting things done."

"VINYL has really helped us speed up application development at a reasonable cost."

"You can unite data which lives in different sources without moving that data."

"The Lite Integration is really the key thing. You're able to attach the Vinyl software to a variety of different systems very easily and pull data together in a way that is really difficult to do using traditional technology... Also, the fact that it's a no-code platform also makes it easier for people to understand and deal with internally, to continue to build applications and modify existing applications."

"It's customizable to whatever you see might use it for... It's very user-friendly, and the front-end is exactly what we need to see, very simple. It can get more complicated too, if those are the needs."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pros

Cons

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"The migration is a bit difficult in the tool."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"Version 2.3 has a good UI but we want a more customizable UI."

"While some of the reporting functionality is adequate, reporting needs to continue to be worked on, given the fact that there are a lot of really good reporting tools out there."

"Perhaps the UI could be improved."

"There are some acknowledged technical limitations. I was looking to do some metadata manipulation, which is very atypical. Zudy said that they will work on building me a workaround. If there is a weakness, that would be it."

"I sometimes find formatting tricky to get the front end of an app the way I want it."

"I'd like to see the next release of VINYL have more user interface solutions to it, so that it could be a more user-friendly product on the front end for the customers that are utilizing the tool. We didn't have a solution to help automate all of our reporting in the past which identified the need to make sure that we could tap into our data sources and automate all of our reporting, which is exactly why we needed the tool."

"Upload time of documents that needed to be uploaded was a request that we were having an issue with. That issue got resolved in [near] real time, within probably 30 minutes."

"The documentation isn't everything it could be, and the user forum is not always the most helpful."

More Jitterbit Vinyl cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is high."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"Pricing was actually one of the things that drew us to the product initially... the way it was licensed at the time, I got a flat monthly fee from Zudy for the Vinyl product, which allowed me to basically have unlimited use of it... We have an annual license, we pay monthly. It's very competitive and very worthwhile given the return we get out of it."

"I feel the product’s pricing is a good value. The licensing model is very straightforward. You license the platform and you can build however many solutions you want with it."

"We also pay for the managed services help that we get from them. But, to me, it is a very effective cost model. Licenses are relatively inexpensive, then you pay by the drink in terms of the managed services that you are going to need, which has been great. We figure out where we want to apply those services and try to be pretty diligent about managing the costs there."

"It is affordable."

"Pricing is less than the cost of a consultant and the value you receive is much greater."

"The pricing and the licensing of Zudy are reasonable. Pricing is always a tricky thing. It could be a little simpler, but they're doing well. I'm happy with it."

"We haven't really had any issues with pricing. Like with any good partnership, you're paying a fair and good price for a good product. That's where great partnerships are developed, when one side doesn't feel like they won in a deal; when both sides feel like they won. That's where we are with Zudy VINYL."

"Compared to if I used traditional methods, such as hiring developers and setting up systems, VINYL is costing me less than half of what it would normally cost."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Performing Arts

Consumer Goods Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

I was a vendor managing Hyland OnBase ( /products/hyland-onbase-reviews ) for Hyland, not as a direct user but as a business partner. We managed the solution and were a partner with Hyland.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 34% of the time

QuickBase vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 30% of the time

Temenos Quantum vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 18% of the time

Studio Creatio vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 18% of the time

More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

December 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl

December 2025

Download Jitterbit Vinyl product report

Also Known As

OnBase

No data available

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications
Utilize guided development and visual rule builders
Predictable pricing with no per-user fees
Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data
Protect apps with enterprise-grade security
Integrate real-time data
Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted
Improve customer digital experience

For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

December 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.