Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hyland OnBase vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

Hyland and Jitterbit are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.7, while Jitterbit is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0. Hyland holds a 0.9% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Jitterbit’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jitterbit users who would recommend it.
Hyland OnBase
Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews
  • 442 Views
  • 10 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Jitterbit Vinyl
Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews
  • 941 Views
  • 23 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and Jitterbit Vinyl compete in the enterprise software solutions category. Hyland OnBase has advantages in pricing and support, while Jitterbit Vinyl is noted for its exceptional features.

Features: Hyland OnBase has strong document management, workflow capabilities, and reasonable pricing. Jitterbit Vinyl offers powerful integration features, ease of use, and advanced integration solutions for enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase needs better mobile access, simplified user training, and improved user support. Jitterbit Vinyl requires better error handling, more extensive documentation, and enhancements in user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase has straightforward deployment but mixed customer service reviews. Jitterbit Vinyl offers simple deployment and superior customer support, leading in both areas.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase is valued for reasonable setup costs and good ROI. Jitterbit Vinyl has higher setup costs but provides strong ROI due to its comprehensive features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
15th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (17th), Enterprise Content Management (5th)
Jitterbit Vinyl
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
23rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (24th), No-Code Development Platforms (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Srinivas Rao Kagitha - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features
The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.
Read full review
LE
Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics
Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard. They have always been great at connecting to a variety of data sources. They are a leader in that space. They do a great job, from a business analyst perspective, helping you shape what the ultimate system is going to look like. There really aren't a lot of areas that need improvement. The areas that they have, they are keenly aware of and have made great strides in recent releases.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."
"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."
"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."
"I like the cloud and its integrability."
"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."
"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."
"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."
"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"
More Hyland OnBase pros
"Vinyl has been a game changer in how we can now quickly deploy key features and new products."
"We have been able to leverage the platform to rapidly build custom solutions, and tailor-make them to our needs."
"VINYL has really helped us speed up application development at a reasonable cost."
"When it comes to the speed of development of the applications with Zudy VINYL it has been the fastest and most powerful that I've been able to do. We've tried building things from scratch. It takes an enormous amount of time. We've cut that time by probably a fifth, with more power. I've been very happy with the speed of doing things in Zudy VINYL."
"The Lite Integration is really the key thing. You're able to attach the Vinyl software to a variety of different systems very easily and pull data together in a way that is really difficult to do using traditional technology... Also, the fact that it's a no-code platform also makes it easier for people to understand and deal with internally, to continue to build applications and modify existing applications."
"We find it is easy to learn and use, and the user interface is easy to pick up. We have trained some of our own people to be able to do apps with VINYL. Therefore, we can turn things around quickly."
"One of the most valuable features of the solution is how rapid we can implement it, going from a design to an operational concept in a very short period of time."
"It allows us higher visibility into our data, which allows us to data-check faster, and validate data that we had not been able to validate, prior."
More Jitterbit Vinyl pros
 

Cons

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."
"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."
"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."
"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."
"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."
"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."
"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."
"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."
More Hyland OnBase cons
"Eventually, a nicer way to create certain features, like the way that we create PDFs, would help. Sometimes the way that it resizes when I have multiple windows up, could also be better. It's minor stuff though. It's edge-case stuff."
"The interface has had a lot of changes to it. It is better than it was before. However, with the subqueries in particular, this has been the most difficult part of the interface."
"There are a lot of almost "hidden" features captured in these Edge Case settings... If you want a scroll bar at the bottom, instead of having it select rows to show, you have to select Disable Panel Location Service, which doesn't sound at all like what it's supposed to do. Naming conventions could be changed a little bit."
"The documentation isn't everything it could be, and the user forum is not always the most helpful."
"If it could be prettier, it might be a bit more attractive on the business side. The most meaningful improvement might be done in some of the aesthetics of the reporting and dashboarding."
"Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles."
"The features that I'd like to see in VINYL next would be the ability to have more control over, or have a rule-based control over column headings and column labels."
"There are some acknowledged technical limitations. I was looking to do some metadata manipulation, which is very atypical. Zudy said that they will work on building me a workaround. If there is a weakness, that would be it."
More Jitterbit Vinyl cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OnBase is reasonably priced."
"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
"The tool's price is high."
"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."
"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."
"Pricing was actually one of the things that drew us to the product initially... the way it was licensed at the time, I got a flat monthly fee from Zudy for the Vinyl product, which allowed me to basically have unlimited use of it... We have an annual license, we pay monthly. It's very competitive and very worthwhile given the return we get out of it."
"You always look for the underlying cost, there's always underlying costs but the value is fine. I don't think it should cost any more. You pay for the software but you're also paying for their employees, when they work onsite for you."
"The pricing and licensing of Zudy are fair."
"I feel the product’s pricing is a good value. The licensing model is very straightforward. You license the platform and you can build however many solutions you want with it."
"The licensing costs we pay are, I believe about 5,000 a month. That's every quarter. We've been doing it for about a year now, and the prices have remained steady. We feel it's a reasonable cost for what we're getting because it's unlimited users. So as big as you want to make it, you're not constrained by a per-user licensing cost or any of those other restrictions, so that's going to stifle your development."
"Pricing is less than the cost of a consultant and the value you receive is much greater."
"We have seen a 30 percent decrease in time for some of our workflows."
"The pricing and the licensing of Zudy are reasonable. Pricing is always a tricky thing. It could be a little simpler, but they're doing well. I'm happy with it."
More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Consumer Goods Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?
The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?
I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase Logo
Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 18% of the time
OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 14% of the time
SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase Logo
SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 12% of the time
IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase Logo
IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 10% of the time
OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase Logo
OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 9% of the time
More Hyland OnBase Competitors
Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl
Compared 65% of the time
Mendix vs Jitterbit Vinyl Logo
Mendix vs Jitterbit Vinyl
Compared 35% of the time
More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Hyland OnBase
June 2025
Hyland OnBase reportDownload Hyland OnBase product report
Buyer's Guide
Jitterbit Vinyl
June 2025
Jitterbit Vinyl reportDownload Jitterbit Vinyl product report
 

Also Known As

OnBase
No data available
 

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

  • Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications

  • Utilize guided development and visual rule builders

  • Predictable pricing with no per-user fees

  • Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data

  • Protect apps with enterprise-grade security

  • Integrate real-time data

  • Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted

  • Improve customer digital experience


For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit
 

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley
Buyer's Guide
Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl
June 2025
Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl
Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Hyland OnBase vs. Jitterbit Vinyl report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.