Hitachi NAS Platform vs IBM FlashSystem comparison

Hitachi Vantara and IBM are both solutions in the NAS category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. Hitachi Vantara holds a 2.5% mindshare in N, compared to IBM’s 11.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Hitachi NAS Platform

Read 12 Hitachi NAS Platform reviews

835 Views
835 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM FlashSystem

Read 112 IBM FlashSystem reviews

7,923 Views
3,090 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Hitachi NAS Platform

IBM FlashSystem

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Hitachi NAS Platform and IBM FlashSystem compete in the storage solutions market. Hitachi NAS Platform has the upper hand in competitive pricing and customer support, while IBM FlashSystem leads in advanced features and performance.

Features: Hitachi NAS Platform offers robust scalability, integrated data protection, and the ability to handle a high number of users. IBM FlashSystem is valued for high-speed performance, advanced analytics, and comprehensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Hitachi NAS Platform could enhance advanced analytics and integration capabilities, improve data migration processes, and offer more features for demanding environments. IBM FlashSystem could improve setup processes, better address user feedback during complex configurations, and enhance initial cost-effectiveness to appeal to a broader market.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hitachi NAS Platform provides simplified deployment and reliable customer service, supporting quick setup and ease of management. IBM FlashSystem involves a more complex deployment but offers dedicated customer service to manage intricate configurations and support.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi NAS Platform is known for its lower setup cost, attracting budget-conscious buyers with a quicker ROI. IBM FlashSystem commands a higher upfront investment, justified by superior performance and long-term benefits, appealing to those prioritizing technological superiority and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi NAS Platform

Ranking in NAS

13th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM FlashSystem

Ranking in NAS

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (3rd), All-Flash Storage (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of Hitachi NAS Platform is 2.5%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem is 11.4%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM FlashSystem	11.4%
Hitachi NAS Platform	2.5%
Other	86.1%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

Needs standalone functionality but provides a robust NAS solution for existing SAN environments

I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity. The current solution only suits customers who already have a Hitachi SAN environment and want to add NAS protocols like NFS and CIFS. It's not suitable for customers without an existing SAN, as they would first need to acquire the SAN infrastructure before adding NAS functionality.

Read full review

OmarIsmail1

Infrastructure Technical Specialist II at Clicks Group

Offers high performance and dependable support for fast storage needs

The most valuable feature of IBM FlashSystem is its robust back code. When integrated properly into the environment and configured according to the guidelines, it provides a very solid infrastructure that does the job on demand. Additionally, IBM FlashSystem offers competitive pricing and reliable performance. The hardware is dependable, ensuring that it functions effectively when the setup is done correctly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product’s technical support services are good."

"The reliability and scalability of Hitachi NAS Platform are valuable features."

"The product has valuable features for data migration."

"It creates a NAS environment on top of Hitachi SAN, which facilitates customers who need NAS protocols along with their existing SAN portfolio."

"Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly."

"There are no other NAS in the current market that can compete with Hitachi in terms of performance."

"The pricing of this solution is good, which is an advantage that positions this product well."

"Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly."

More Hitachi NAS Platform pros

"The most valuable features are deduplication and compression."

"Data deduplication is one of the most valuable features of this solution."

"IBM FlashSystem has been stable in our operations."

"One of the valuable features is the performance, it is one of the best in the market."

"The storage system is one of the best in the world."

"One of the most valuable features is that it's very easy to use and configure. It used to be more difficult, but now it's almost flawless."

"The power systems are very reliable if you are running 24/7 operations. For ongoing mission-critical applications, it's the best solution."

"No queuing and high ops, speed, and performance."

More IBM FlashSystem pros

Cons

"For the Hitachi NAS Platform, the tools are basic and don't provide much insight."

"The Hitachi NAS Platform is too complicated, not simple, and not cost-effective, sometimes being inappropriate for most situations."

"Hitachi NAS Platform needs to improve by offering a unified storage solution. Due to budget constraints in regions like Southeast Asia, customers prefer a single machine that can handle all problems, which the current platform does not provide."

"Hitachi could be more flexible and have a simpler management interface."

"The monitoring tool is not well developed."

"Hitachi NAS Platform's pricing could be reduced. It is high compared to other competitors."

"There are insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"Hitachi NAS Platform is expensive."

More Hitachi NAS Platform cons

"This product lacks some of the options we wanted. For example, expansion was difficult and it required a lot of patching to be done."

"The initial setup is complex."

"The GUI for monitoring performance metrics could provide better visibility. For example, it doesn't let me segregate the IOPS per volume."

"Enterprise data storage needs improvement. They should create a feature for data and file storage."

"The storage capacity of this solution could be improved."

"There is room for improvement in the troubleshooting part, specifically related to IBM Spectrum for Insight. Customers are uncomfortable with remote access, which affects automated remote support."

"In the next release having the next level of high-speed performance would be great."

"The pricing could be improved, but I think it's getting better and better with each version. IBM needs to implement NAS storage again, as this is a big flaw. Dell EMC is very good at this and if you compared them based on NAS storage, Dell EMC would win right away. IBM's solution for NAS storage is very complicated. We don't have a storage box that provides file sharing from itself, we have to put software on it and go through a whole complicated process. It should be simplified."

More IBM FlashSystem cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a highly-priced product."

"Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."

"Hitachi NAS Platform’s price is high and depends on SCSI disc capacity."

"I would rate the solution's pricing six to seven out of ten."

"This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The price of IBM FlashSystem is reasonable."

"They've been much more aggressive in the last five, six years than they were before that."

"I'd rate the basic licensing and the Virtualize software a ten out of ten, and the extra Spectrum and other an eight out of ten."

"Among IBM, Dell EMC, and Pure Storage, IBM is the cheapest. The price is also based on our location, the size of our entity, and our regular annual purchases from them. We are a very big IBM customer, so we normally get very high discounts. We are not a big customer of Pure Storage. We don't buy that much from Pure Storage per year. Everything is included in the price. There is no extra license for different functions."

"For a yearly license, it is about $100,000. There are no additional costs. The entire system is included."

"There are no licensing fees, it is a one-time purchase of the IBM FlashSystem."

"This solution is expensive compared to other solutions."

More IBM FlashSystem pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	57

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hiachi NAS Platform?

The product has valuable features for data migration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hiachi NAS Platform?

The pricing for the Hitachi NAS is higher compared to other NAS solutions since the NAS protocol is provided on top of the existing SAN environment, requiring an additional device for NAS functiona...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hiachi NAS Platform?

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem?

It is simple to make an update.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?

The pricing is reasonable for IBM FlashSystem.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?

Some improvements are required in IBM regarding response time and resolution time, though not about competence. Product-wise, it performs well. We have not used AI features yet, and I believe havin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 40% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 18% of the time

NetApp Private Storage vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 12% of the time

More Hitachi NAS Platform Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 22% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 9% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 9% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp AFF vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM FlashSystem Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

August 2025

Download Hitachi NAS Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM FlashSystem

September 2025

Download IBM FlashSystem product report

Also Known As

Hitachi NAS

IBM Storwize

Overview

Hitachi NAS Platforms help you with file sharing, file server consolidation and application storage for Oracle, Microsoft and virtual environments. Deploy the highest performance per node in the industry. Apply capacity efficiencies that let you actually do more, but with a lot less. Realize significant cost savings for your organization.

Hitachi Vantara

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

IBM

Sample Customers

Intersect Australia

Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

September 2025

Free Report: Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.