Hitachi NAS Platform vs Qumulo comparison

Read 16 Qumulo reviews

5,322 Views
2,555 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hitachi NAS Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Hitachi NAS Platform and Qumulo compete in the data storage industry, each with unique features. Qumulo may offer greater long-term value due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Hitachi NAS Platform provides reliable data protection, efficient storage management, and a comprehensive data migration solution. Qumulo features real-time analytics, ease of management, and quick implementation of special permissions.

Room for Improvement: Hitachi NAS Platform could enhance its real-time analytics and adaptability to changing needs. It may also improve API-driven integrations. Qumulo can bolster its disaster recovery options, streamline integration with backup solutions, and enhance user scalability features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hitachi NAS Platform allows straightforward deployment with rigorous support, while Qumulo offers a flexible setup with an intuitive interface supported by responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi NAS Platform typically involves a lower initial investment cost with favorable ROI for budget-conscious businesses. Qumulo requires higher initial costs but offers significant ROI through enhanced data management efficiency and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi NAS Platform vs. Qumulo Report (Updated: November 2026).

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. Qumulo

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi NAS Platform

Ranking in NAS

12th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qumulo

Ranking in NAS

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of Hitachi NAS Platform is 2.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qumulo is 3.6%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qumulo	3.6%
Hitachi NAS Platform	2.5%
Other	93.9%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

Needs standalone functionality but provides a robust NAS solution for existing SAN environments

I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity. The current solution only suits customers who already have a Hitachi SAN environment and want to add NAS protocols like NFS and CIFS. It's not suitable for customers without an existing SAN, as they would first need to acquire the SAN infrastructure before adding NAS functionality.

Read full review

reviewer2536608

Solutions Architect at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

UI has simplified pixel data insights and cost savings while hardware lifecycle still needs work

There is an option I would like to see. Instead of installing a separate Grafana server to get the telemetry data, why can we not set up the same capability in the UI itself? Then we could choose the retention period of the log and get everything inside the Qumulo dashboard itself, rather than installing a separate Grafana server, because we need to maintain a separate server to collect these metrics. There is one more needed improvement I noticed. If you compare Qumulo to Dell Isilon as a vendor, a patch update with Dell Isilon covers the hardware as well. In Qumulo, however, you have to maintain the hardware lifecycle and the software separately. This means every time you update your server, you have to update two entities: one is the hardware and the other is Qumulo. So it might be quite challenging. A great deal of time is also involved for an engineer to do both of these things, so I do not think Qumulo can directly integrate with the hardware so that we can update the Qumulo software together with the hardware patches. Right now, I do not have any other improvements needed for Qumulo that I have not mentioned yet.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reliability and scalability of Hitachi NAS Platform are valuable features."

"Hitachi is reliable with high availability and solid performance. It performs well regardless of the workload."

"There are no other NAS in the current market that can compete with Hitachi in terms of performance."

"The reliability of the product is its best feature."

"It creates a NAS environment on top of Hitachi SAN, which facilitates customers who need NAS protocols along with their existing SAN portfolio."

"Hitachi NAS Platform is very stable."

"The Hitachi storage platform is highly scalable and highly available."

"The product has valuable features for data migration."

More Hitachi NAS Platform pros

"One of the best things I love about Qumulo is the performance and the support available."

"The ratio of total operational cost to complexity versus feature set is very good."

"All in all, it's a very good product, resilient, with good performance and scalability that is pretty easy."

"Overall, it is a solid tool that works very well on-premises and in cloud environments."

"Qumulo has positively impacted my organization by simplifying storage management while providing a single, scalable platform, reducing administrative efforts, making storage growth easier to manage, and allowing users to experience consistent performance."

"It is a very stable product. I never faced any issues."

"The best feature I saw in Qumulo is that the UI itself is pretty easy to use."

"The most valuable features of Qumulo are its rolling updates and all-day availability."

More Qumulo pros

Cons

"I rated Hitachi NAS a seven out of ten, primarily due to the interface or insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"There are insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"The Hitachi NAS Platform is too complicated, not simple, and not cost-effective, sometimes being inappropriate for most situations."

"We would like to have a more economical version of this solution that is suitable for use with a mid-range scale, such as one that can handle between 35,000 and 50,000 users."

"I encounter challenges while installing the upgrades for the product."

"I would like to see the inclusion of support for cloud-connectivity to providers like AWS."

"I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity."

"For the Hitachi NAS Platform, the tools are basic and don't provide much insight."

More Hitachi NAS Platform cons

"The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive."

"The main hiccup, as I mentioned, is that the hardware lifecycle patch is the most critical issue."

"The key differences, both pros and cons of Qumulo in comparison to other technologies are that I have outlined quite a lot of pros, while the cons I can see include some challenges between the software and hardware."

"The support for iMac and protocols should be improved, not all features are available."

"There is plenty of room for improvement. In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates."

"I have not seen a concrete return on investment with Qumulo, as the project scope does not allow me to assess metrics such as money or time saved."

"In the next release, I would like to see the ability to have more control at a terminal level of the file system."

"Qumulo should continue to expand automation and orchestration capabilities."

More Qumulo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing six to seven out of ten."

"Hitachi NAS Platform’s price is high and depends on SCSI disc capacity."

"This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"It is a highly-priced product."

"Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."

"The price of the solution is in the middle range compared to others. We look at the price per terabyte."

"The price of Qumulo is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hiachi NAS Platform?

The pricing for the Hitachi NAS is higher compared to other NAS solutions since the NAS protocol is provided on top of the existing SAN environment, requiring an additional device for NAS functiona...

What needs improvement with Hiachi NAS Platform?

For the Hitachi NAS Platform, the tools are basic and don't provide much insight. They can continue to improve the interface to keep it up-to-date, and maybe add some new features or better ways of...

What is your primary use case for Hiachi NAS Platform?

We sell the Hitachi NAS Platform, and it is the best product for our customers. I sell it to banks, telecom companies, and other enterprises at the enterprise level. We have a cluster with Hitachi ...

What needs improvement with Qumulo?

Qumulo can be improved but not necessarily; it was fairly smooth to set up, and the support is great and easy to manage. Regarding Qumulo's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security are ...

What is your primary use case for Qumulo?

My main use case for Qumulo is asset data storage. When I was working at Mercury Filmworks, we used Qumulo to store our digital assets that artists work on, so people both ways retrieve assets, wor...

What advice do you have for others considering Qumulo?

I would rate Qumulo a nine on a scale of 1 to 10. I rate it a nine because the cost is what keeps it from being a ten; it is an expensive solution, but if you do have the funds to acquire Qumulo st...

Dell PowerScale vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 12% of the time

LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Spectra Verde NAS vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Scale-out NAS vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Hitachi NAS Platform Competitors

Dell PowerScale vs Qumulo

Compared 14% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Qumulo

Compared 10% of the time

VAST Data vs Qumulo

Compared 6% of the time

Hitachi Content Platform vs Qumulo

Compared 6% of the time

Everpure FlashBlade vs Qumulo

Compared 5% of the time

More Qumulo Competitors

Product Reports

Download Hitachi NAS Platform product report

NAS

October 2026

Download Qumulo product report

October 2026

Also Known As

Hitachi NAS

No data available

Overview

Hitachi NAS Platform offers high performance and user capacity with reliable and scalable features like NAS to NAS replication. Its seamless integration with SAN infrastructure suits enterprise environments, particularly in financial and telecom sectors where performance is critical.

Hitachi NAS Platform stands out for its stability and scalability, handling extensive user numbers efficiently. Its integration capabilities with SAN infrastructures are ideal for critical applications in banking and telecommunications. Users value its effective data migration and comprehensive functionality, ensuring high availability and adaptability in diverse IT environments. Despite its robust features, users sometimes note its steep pricing and suggest improvements in management interface, quota and backup management, and cloud connectivity. Enhancements in flexibility and scalability could further increase its appeal across various enterprise scenarios.

What are the standout features?

Reliability and Scalability: Supports NAS to NAS replication.
Data Migration: Ensures effective integration within existing SAN setups.
High Availability: Guarantees performance suited for enterprise needs.
Workload Adaptability: Adjusts to storage operations and data access requirements.

What benefits or ROI should be expected?

Performance Boost: Crucial for banking and telecom sectors.
Improved Storage Operations: Enhances data accessibility.
Enterprise Compatibility: Works seamlessly with other storage systems.
Disaster Recovery: Offers zero RPO and RTO with Global-Active Device.

Hitachi NAS Platform is frequently utilized as a high-speed NAS gateway, prevalent in file sharing and media server contexts. Enterprises such as telecom and financial institutions deploy it for disaster recovery alongside technologies like NetApp and Fujitsu. System integrators often choose it for home directories and media server environments.

Hitachi Vantara

Qumulo offers an efficient and reliable file-sharing platform with real-time analytics and seamless integration with major cloud services, ensuring ease of use and high IO speed for storage needs.

With its focus on file sharing, real-time analytics, and reliability, Qumulo allows for smooth operations, ease of use, and resilience. It boasts integration with AWS and Google Cloud, providing enhanced functionality with a strong operational cost-to-complexity ratio. Despite requests for software upgrades and better support for certain protocols, it remains a competitive choice for centralized media storage and object-based storage solutions.

What are Qumulo's most important features?

File Sharing: Offers seamless file sharing capabilities.
Reliability: Ensures stable and dependable operations.
Ease of Use: Designed with user-friendly interfaces.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights and data analysis.
No Downtime Updates: Supports upgrading without interruptions.
Failover Capability: Allows disaster recovery operations.
Cloud Integration: Compatible with AWS and Google Cloud.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Performance: High IO speed in storage systems.
Cost Efficiency: Benefits from operational cost-to-complexity ratio.
Data Insights: Detailed analytics on processes and usage.
Integration Potential: Easy integration with cloud and backup platforms.

Organizations in marketing and entertainment industries rely on Qumulo for managing files, media storage, and archiving needs. On-premises deployments are common for centralized media storage, facilitating object-based storage for videos, images, and office data support. The solution appeals to solution providers and resellers seeking market presence with application versatility.

Sample Customers

Intersect Australia

County of Riverside Sheriff Department, Hyundai Mobis Automotive North America, University of Arizona, UCSD - San Diego Supercomputer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Sinclair Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Kaiser Permanente, Deluxe Creative, Vexcel Imaging, University of Florida, The Madison Square Garden Company, Arizona State University, Cinesite, San Diego Padres Baseball, Johns Hopkins University - School of Medicine, IHME, EllieMae, Washington State University.