Hitachi NAS Platform vs Qumulo comparison

Hitachi Vantara and Qumulo are both solutions in the NAS category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qumulo is ranked #12. Hitachi Vantara holds a 2.7% mindshare in N, compared to Qumulo’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qumulo users who would recommend it.

Hitachi NAS Platform

Read 12 Hitachi NAS Platform reviews

1,045 Views
1,045 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qumulo

Read 8 Qumulo reviews

3,217 Views
1,544 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hitachi NAS Platform

Qumulo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Hitachi NAS Platform and Qumulo compete in the data storage industry, each with unique features. Qumulo may offer greater long-term value due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Hitachi NAS Platform provides reliable data protection, efficient storage management, and a comprehensive data migration solution. Qumulo features real-time analytics, ease of management, and quick implementation of special permissions.

Room for Improvement: Hitachi NAS Platform could enhance its real-time analytics and adaptability to changing needs. It may also improve API-driven integrations. Qumulo can bolster its disaster recovery options, streamline integration with backup solutions, and enhance user scalability features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hitachi NAS Platform allows straightforward deployment with rigorous support, while Qumulo offers a flexible setup with an intuitive interface supported by responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi NAS Platform typically involves a lower initial investment cost with favorable ROI for budget-conscious businesses. Qumulo requires higher initial costs but offers significant ROI through enhanced data management efficiency and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi NAS Platform vs. Qumulo Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. Qumulo

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi NAS Platform

Ranking in NAS

11th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qumulo

Ranking in NAS

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of Hitachi NAS Platform is 2.7%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qumulo is 5.2%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Hitachi NAS Platform	2.7%
Qumulo	5.2%
Other	92.1%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

Needs standalone functionality but provides a robust NAS solution for existing SAN environments

I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity. The current solution only suits customers who already have a Hitachi SAN environment and want to add NAS protocols like NFS and CIFS. It's not suitable for customers without an existing SAN, as they would first need to acquire the SAN infrastructure before adding NAS functionality.

Read full review

VinceVitro

Senior Storage Architect at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Useful data sharing, simple cluster scaling, and excellent support

One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Some bugs cause issues but I love the ASIC architecture behind it."

"Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly."

"There are no other NAS in the current market that can compete with Hitachi in terms of performance."

"The reliability of the product is its best feature."

"Simple and extremely reliable."

"It creates a NAS environment on top of Hitachi SAN, which facilitates customers who need NAS protocols along with their existing SAN portfolio."

"Hitachi is reliable with high availability and solid performance. It performs well regardless of the workload."

"The Hitachi storage platform is highly scalable and highly available."

More Hitachi NAS Platform pros

"It is a very stable product. I never faced any issues."

"The most valuable feature of Qumulo is the ability to share files and reliability."

"The most valuable feature is real-time analytics."

"The ratio of total operational cost to complexity versus feature set is very good."

"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system."

"The most valuable features of Qumulo are the ease of management and special permissions that are quick to enable. The overall performance of the solution is good."

"The data protection algorithm to protect the data between the nodes has been the most valuable feature. The integration with backup platforms such as Veeam and Veritas has also been valuable."

"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system."

More Qumulo pros

Cons

"I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity."

"There are insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"The monitoring tool is not well developed and my guess is that the companies are not investing too much money in this area."

"I do not like Hitachi NAS because it's an old-school NAS solution, compared to the other, newer-type solutions such as Isilon from Dell or Qumulo."

"The Hitachi NAS Platform is too complicated, not simple, and not cost-effective, sometimes being inappropriate for most situations."

"We have had two stability issues: We had a bad software version that used to randomly crash both nodes in a cluster File system corruption after activating in DR site"

"I rated Hitachi NAS a seven out of ten, primarily due to the interface or insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"The monitoring tool is not well developed."

More Hitachi NAS Platform cons

"In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates."

"The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive."

"In the next release, I would like to see the ability to have more control at a terminal level of the file system."

"The solution could improve availability and improve data protection or data services such as compression of deduplication. In a future release, we'd like to have more cloud API integrations."

"Qumulo should continue to expand automation and orchestration capabilities."

"One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential."

"The support for iMac and protocols should be improved, not all features are available."

"Some anti-theft permissions do not transfer well to Qumulo."

More Qumulo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Hitachi NAS Platform’s price is high and depends on SCSI disc capacity."

"Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."

"It is a highly-priced product."

"I would rate the solution's pricing six to seven out of ten."

"This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The price of Qumulo is reasonable."

"The price of the solution is in the middle range compared to others. We look at the price per terabyte."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hiachi NAS Platform?

The pricing for the Hitachi NAS is higher compared to other NAS solutions since the NAS protocol is provided on top of the existing SAN environment, requiring an additional device for NAS functiona...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hiachi NAS Platform?

For the Hitachi NAS Platform, the tools are basic and don't provide much insight. They can continue to improve the interface to keep it up-to-date, and maybe add some new features or better ways of...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hiachi NAS Platform?

We sell the Hitachi NAS Platform, and it is the best product for our customers. I sell it to banks, telecom companies, and other enterprises at the enterprise level. We have a cluster with Hitachi ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 19% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 12% of the time

LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Spectra Verde NAS vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Huawei OceanStor 9000 vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Hitachi NAS Platform Competitors

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Qumulo

Compared 18% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Qumulo

Compared 11% of the time

VAST Data vs Qumulo

Compared 9% of the time

Everpure FlashBlade vs Qumulo

Compared 7% of the time

Nasuni vs Qumulo

Compared 6% of the time

More Qumulo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

March 2026

Download Hitachi NAS Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

NAS

March 2026

Download Qumulo product report

Also Known As

Hitachi NAS

No data available

Overview

Hitachi NAS Platforms help you with file sharing, file server consolidation and application storage for Oracle, Microsoft and virtual environments. Deploy the highest performance per node in the industry. Apply capacity efficiencies that let you actually do more, but with a lot less. Realize significant cost savings for your organization.

Hitachi Vantara

Qumulo is a data storage and management platform that promotes object-based storage for users, backup archives, and surveillance. Its primary use case is to provide a cost-effective and feature-rich solution for managing large data.

Qumulo's data protection algorithm ensures the safety of node data, while its integration with backup platforms like Veeam and Veritas makes it easy to manage backups. The platform offers a good balance between operational cost and complexity versus feature set, making it an attractive option for businesses of all sizes.

Qumulo

Sample Customers

Intersect Australia

County of Riverside Sheriff Department, Hyundai Mobis Automotive North America, University of Arizona, UCSD - San Diego Supercomputer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Sinclair Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Kaiser Permanente, Deluxe Creative, Vexcel Imaging, University of Florida, The Madison Square Garden Company, Arizona State University, Cinesite, San Diego Padres Baseball, Johns Hopkins University - School of Medicine, IHME, EllieMae, Washington State University.

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. Qumulo

March 2026

Free Report: Hitachi NAS Platform vs. Qumulo

Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS Platform vs. Qumulo and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hitachi NAS Platform vs. Qumulo report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.