Google Cloud Bigtable vs IBM IMS comparison

Google and IBM are both solutions in the Non-Relational Databases category. Google is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #12. Google holds a 6.1% mindshare in NRD, compared to IBM’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution.

Google Cloud Bigtable

Read 9 Google Cloud Bigtable reviews

897 Views
251 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM IMS

374 Views
120 Comparison Views

Google Cloud Bigtable

IBM IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 15, 2026

IBM IMS and Google Cloud Bigtable are competing products in large-scale data management. IBM IMS is preferred for its robust transaction processing system and integration capabilities, while Google Cloud Bigtable holds an advantage in scalability and performance for real-time analytics.

Features: IBM IMS excels with its hierarchical database model, providing high-speed processing and reliability crucial for applications. Its integration capabilities are essential for industries needing rapid transaction processing and legacy system compatibility. Google Cloud Bigtable offers exceptional scalability, optimized for high-throughput applications, and is favored for handling substantial data sets in businesses focused on analytics and real-time processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM IMS features strong support mechanisms and an on-premise deployment process allowing extensive customization but requiring initial configuration. Google Cloud Bigtable’s cloud-based deployment facilitates quick integration with Google Cloud services, minimizing setup time but requiring adaptation to its service model.

Pricing and ROI: IBM IMS provides a lower startup cost, appealing to established enterprises that gain ROI through stability and resilience. Google Cloud Bigtable, although higher priced, delivers significant ROI for companies that require expansive scalability and real-time processing, particularly benefiting those with cloud-first strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Non-Relational Databases Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Non-Relational Databases

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Bigtable

Ranking in Non-Relational Databases

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed NoSQL Databases (10th)

IBM IMS

Ranking in Non-Relational Databases

12th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Non-Relational Databases category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Bigtable is 6.1%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM IMS is 3.1%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Non-Relational Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Google Cloud Bigtable	6.1%
IBM IMS	3.1%
Other	90.8%

Non-Relational Databases

Featured Reviews

Akash Shanker

Team Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Consistent performance and seamless cloud integration enhance analytics capabilities while reducing management complexity

One point for improvement in Google Cloud Bigtable is that people have confusion in mapping. There are many similar products available, and Google has managed services for similar products as well. It would be easier if the journey of knowing when to use Google Cloud Bigtable versus other Cloud SQL and alternates such as Cloud Spanner is made clearer for users. Regarding additional functionality for Google Cloud Bigtable, I am uncertain if LLMs can be integrated or if Google Cloud Bigtable can act as a vector store for LLM-specific use cases where we are interacting or using generative AI capabilities.

Read full review

Use IBM IMS?

Leave a review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Bigtable?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Bigtable?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Bigtable?

My main use case for Google Cloud Bigtable is mainly for advertisement-related analytics-related use cases.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 18% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon Keyspaces vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 14% of the time

Timescale vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 7% of the time

More Google Cloud Bigtable Competitors

CA IDMS vs IBM IMS

Compared 78% of the time

Adabas vs IBM IMS

Compared 11% of the time

Objectivity DB vs IBM IMS

Compared 11% of the time

More IBM IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed NoSQL Databases

January 2026

Download Google Cloud Bigtable product report

Buyer's Guide

Non-Relational Databases

February 2026

Download IBM IMS product report

Also Known As

Google BigTable

IMS

Overview

Google Cloud Bigtable provides large data capacity, fast computation speed, and robust security for efficient data management. It supports seamless querying and integration, making it suitable for users transitioning to the cloud.

Google Cloud Bigtable is a managed service offering that facilitates efficient data handling through its high-performance capabilities and compatibility with other NoSQL databases. It is highly valued for its ability to manage and analyze large datasets, offering features like backup and replication, and is known for being faster than many competitors. Despite its strengths, users express concerns over its pricing, querying complexity, occasional performance lag, and difficulty in choosing between Bigtable and other services. There's also interest in its potential for integration with emerging technologies like LLMs for generative AI applications.

What are the key features of Google Cloud Bigtable?

Large Data Capacity: Supports immense volumes of data, essential for big data initiatives.
Seamless Querying: Queries large datasets with efficiency and speed.
Backup and Replication: Provides data reliability and easy recovery.
Low Latency: Ensures fast response times for queries and operations.
High Computation Speed: Offers rapid data processing capabilities.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Data Security: Provides robust security for sensitive data.
Ease of Analysis: Simplifies the process of collating and analyzing data.
Cloud Integration: Compatible with other NoSQL databases, aiding cloud transitions.
Fast Performance: Noted for being quicker than many alternatives.

Industries implement Google Cloud Bigtable for data management tasks such as managing large datasets, resolving production issues, and generating insights through dashboards. It is used in advertising analytics, client data evaluation in Power BI reports, and some automotive clients employ it for specialized needs, integrating business data into Google's ecosystem for efficient analysis.

Google

Off-the-shelf warehouse management solution designed to help automate and streamline facility operations.

IBM

Sample Customers

Cognite, Dow Jones, Loblaw Digital

Nice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Hudson River HealthCare, SRG Global, The Poseidon Project, The City of Edinburgh Council, PotashCorp, ANZ, OTTO, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, NASCO, Apria Healthcare, Folksam

Buyer's Guide

Non-Relational Databases

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxData, Oracle, Actian and others in Non-Relational Databases. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.