Google Cloud Bigtable vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Google Logo
1,935 views|1,155 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
5,755 views|2,528 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Bigtable and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Managed NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Stability-wise, it is a simple solution. I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.""Bigtable is faster than other competitors in the market. It helps us collate all the data, and the security features are great. The latency is low, and the computation speed is fantastic. Bigtable is also a managed service, so you don't have to worry about anything aside from analyzing the data ingested.""The most valuable feature is the backup and replication service.""Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The solution is very convenient.""It's very user-friendly where streaming data is required."

More Google Cloud Bigtable Pros →

"With Azure you can start small and grow as you need.""The solution is user friendly and Microsoft's technical support is good.""It's highly scalable and supports consistency, security, and multiple security options.""The initial setup is simple and straightforward. You can set up a Cosmos DB in a day, even configuring things like availability zones around the world.""Its wide support to the ecosystem is valuable. We can use this database with a lot of use cases, and that's one of the reasons why we prefer it. We have a lot of vendors, databases, and use cases, and wherever possible, we are trying to standardize databases. It is also secure.""Cosmos DB makes life easier because if we want to use Mongo-type data, or Cassandra-type data, or maybe even just a simple cable storage-type data, then graph, there are multiple ways to do this.""One of the nice features is the ability to auto-scale""Cosmos DB is stable and easy to use."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Pros →

Cons
"This product needs better security and transparency, and the price should be reduced.""I've used Bigtable for about three or four years.""The cost of this product is too expensive.""When it comes to complex queries, a user can't get any help from a drop-down box and pick columns. It would be great if some improvements could be made in the aforementioned area concerning the solution.""Improvement should be made as per customer recommended and requirements.""The lagging problem of the product I face is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Google Cloud Bigtable Cons →

"The built-in integration of the solution is tight.""The biggest problem is the learning curve and other database services like RDS.""The pricing of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings.""An improvement would be a more robust functionality around updating elements on a document, or some type of procedural updates that don't require pulling the entire document.""At this stage, we would like more enterprise support. We use MongoDB a lot, and we're trying to get rid of MongoDB. So, I would like to see more features in the Cosmos DB API for MongoDB space.""The API compatibility has room for improvement, particularly integration with MongoDB. You have to connect to a specific flavor of MongoDB. We'd also like a richer query capability in line with the latest Mongo features. That is one thing on our wish list. The current version is good enough for our use case, but it could be improved.""A couple features that would help me in architectural solutions would be customizable architecture or customizable documentation, which both Microsoft Azure or Microsoft Teams can provide.""It would be nice to have more options to ingest the data, for example, more file options or more search options. Currently, you can use JSON, but if there were other file types you can use for data ingestion, that would be nice."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Cosmos should be cheaper. We actually intend to stop using it in the near future because the price is too high."
  • "There is a licensing fee."
  • "For the cloud, we don't pay for the license, but for the on-prem versions, we do pay."
  • "Cosmos DB is a PaaS, so there are no upfront costs for infrastructure. There are only subscriptions you pay for Azure and things like that. But it's a PaaS, so it's a subscription service. The license isn't perpetual, and the cost might seem expensive on its face, but you have to look at the upkeep for infrastructure and what you're saving."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB could be a bit lower."
  • "The cost is the biggest limitation of this solution."
  • "Azure is a pay as you go subscription."
  • "The RU's use case determines our license fees."
  • More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:The lagging problem of the product I face is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the performance of the product needs improvement.
    Top Answer:When a client gives our organization a project where they need a dashboard for their company, they provide us with some data from their database, which is usually presented in Google Cloud Bigtable… more »
    Top Answer:Since it's a managed service, Azure backend handles scalability. From a user's perspective, we don't need to worry about scalability.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in terms of stability.
    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    1,935
    Comparisons
    1,155
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    365
    Rating
    9.0
    1st
    Views
    5,755
    Comparisons
    2,528
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    494
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Azure DocumentDB, MS Azure Cosmos DB
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cloud Bigtable is Google's NoSQL Big Data database service. It's the same database that powers many core Google services, including Search, Analytics, Maps, and Gmail.

    DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development. As a schema-free NoSQL database, DocumentDB provides rich and familiar SQL query capabilities with consistent low latencies on JSON data - ensuring that 99% of your reads are served under 10 milliseconds and 99% of your writes are served under 15 milliseconds. These unique benefits make DocumentDB a great fit for web, mobile, gaming, and IoT, and many other applications that need seamless scale and global replication.

    Sample Customers
    Cognite, Dow Jones, Loblaw Digital
    American Cancer Society, Exxon Mobil, Symantec
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    University14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer9%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Retailer8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Google Cloud Bigtable is ranked 3rd in Managed NoSQL Databases with 6 reviews while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is ranked 1st in Managed NoSQL Databases with 38 reviews. Google Cloud Bigtable is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Bigtable writes "A stable product to help resolve production-related issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB writes "Removes bottlenecks related to databases in our application and works quickly because of reference keys". Google Cloud Bigtable is most compared with Amazon DynamoDB and Amazon Timestream, whereas Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is most compared with Amazon Neptune, Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon DocumentDB, Neo4j AuraDB and Amazon Timestream. See our Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB report.

    See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.