• Home
  • IBM IMS vs. Objectivity DB

IBM IMS vs Objectivity DB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM IMS

100 views|96 comparisons
Objectivity Logo

Objectivity DB

106 views|78 comparisons
Ranking
7th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
100
Comparisons
96
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
10th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
106
Comparisons
78
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
IMS
Objectivity/DB
Learn More
IBM
Objectivity
Video Not Available
Overview
Off-the-shelf warehouse management solution designed to help automate and streamline facility operations.
Objectivity/DB is a scalable, high performance, distributed Object Database (ODBMS). It is extremely good at handling complex data, where there are many types of connections between objects and many variants.
Sample Customers
Nice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Hudson River HealthCare, SRG Global, The Poseidon Project, The City of Edinburgh Council, PotashCorp, ANZ, OTTO, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, NASCO, Apria Healthcare, Folksam
CGG, Dr_gerwerk, Siemens
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Government13%
Manufacturing Company7%
Computer Software Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available

IBM IMS is ranked 7th in Non-Relational Databases while Objectivity DB is ranked 10th in Non-Relational Databases. IBM IMS is rated 0.0, while Objectivity DB is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM IMS is most compared with CA IDMS and Adabas, whereas Objectivity DB is most compared with TileDB.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.