Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Bigtable comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Managed NoSQL Databases category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 17.3% mindshare in MND, compared to Google’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon DynamoDB

Read 43 Amazon DynamoDB reviews

1,704 Views
1,430 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Bigtable

Read 6 Google Cloud Bigtable reviews

909 Views
514 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon DynamoDB

Google Cloud Bigtable

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

Google Cloud Bigtable and Amazon DynamoDB are competing in the NoSQL database sector. Amazon DynamoDB seems to have an advantage due to its extensive features and adaptability.

Features: Google Cloud Bigtable is known for its speed and high-throughput handling, optimal for real-time analytics and large-scale operations. It offers competitive pricing and consistent support. Amazon DynamoDB provides integrated security, global table support, and a serverless architecture, appealing for flexibility. Its robust features support advanced capabilities and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Bigtable could enhance its feature set to rival competitors better. More integrations with other cloud services and tools would be beneficial. Increased transparency in pricing models could help attract more cost-conscious customers. Amazon DynamoDB could streamline its complex setup process. Expanding documentation on advanced features and providing more detailed cost predictions could improve user experience. An easier interface for handling multiple indexes or complex queries would be desirable.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Bigtable emphasizes a straightforward deployment process, offering detailed documentation and customer service access. Amazon DynamoDB's deployment is more complex but is supported by extensive resources and customer support, catering to users needing comprehensive service interaction.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Bigtable provides competitively priced solutions focused on cost-efficient large-scale data management, evident in its transparent ROI potential through lower infrastructure needs. Amazon DynamoDB, while having higher setup costs, offers advanced capabilities and a feature-rich environment, potentially leading to better ROI for businesses needing flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon DynamoDB

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud Bigtable

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Amazon DynamoDB is 17.3%, down from 25.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud Bigtable is 5.2%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Prabin Silwal

Senior Engineering Consultant at ASSURANCE IQ, INC.

Offers exceptional performance to users

Previously, when in my company, we used to store 64 KB of data, we used to get problems and errors, and due to such reason, at such a point in time, we had to find a different storage system or modify the system so that the size of the value is not more than 64 KB. The main aforementioned issue in the tool can be considered for improvement for Amazon DynamoDB. In our company, we have some data which can be stored as we want. Previously, only 64 KB could be used, and later, I think, it was about 400 KB. If the tool could have an additional 10 MB to offer, then the tool could be easier to use. The tool is a key value storage, where the key will be long. In terms of value, we couldn't store more than 64 kb previously in the tool, but later on, it was increased to 400 KB, which is a limitation that I don't like in the tool.

Read full review

Aakash Sharma

Senior Technical Architect at HCL Technologies

Great for streaming data and being a managed service is an advantage

Our primary use case is for analytics, analyzing the data sets and curing Bigtable is very user-friendly where streaming data is required. I think it's relatively easier to use than Ascentra. The fact that it's a managed service is an advantage. The cost of this product is too expensive.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a NoSQL product."

"The best feature is NoSQL."

"We directly pass the JSON value to Amazon DynamoDB, which is why Amazon DynamoDB is faster than relational databases."

"The platform is easy to develop and configure."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the non-relational database."

"I appreciate the visibility of DynamoDB, as I can observe everything on the Console."

"Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed service by AWS, and it is designed to provide fast and predictable performance."

"Amazon DynamoDB allows you to configure your read-write capacity and create a single global table that can be accessed with any other region."

More Amazon DynamoDB pros

"It's very user-friendly where streaming data is required."

"Stability-wise, it is a simple solution. I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

"The solution is very convenient."

"Bigtable is faster than other competitors in the market. It helps us collate all the data, and the security features are great. The latency is low, and the computation speed is fantastic. Bigtable is also a managed service, so you don't have to worry about anything aside from analyzing the data ingested."

"The most valuable feature is the backup and replication service."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

Cons

"If you have no prior experience with this type of non-relational database, the syntaxes, implementation, or understanding may be difficult."

"The solution could be cheaper."

"Maybe the documentation could be improved a bit. Sometimes, it's a little confusing, and people can easily be mistaken about DynamoDB."

"The solution has size limitations. It also needs to be more user-friendly."

"If you purchase the support plan, their support team is good. If not, it takes two to three days to respond, sometimes even more."

"They could provide more information or training programs to deliver knowledge to the engineers about the components of relational databases similar to popular vendors."

"Previously, only 64 KB could be used, and later, I think, it was about 400 KB. If the tool could have an additional 10 MB to offer, then the tool could be easier to use."

"Defining simple expressions and queries can be slightly complicated due to DynamoDB's unique JSON syntax. This can be confusing, especially for beginners."

More Amazon DynamoDB cons

"The cost of this product is too expensive."

"This product needs better security and transparency, and the price should be reduced."

"The lagging problem of the product I face is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Improvement should be made as per customer recommended and requirements."

"I've used Bigtable for about three or four years."

"When it comes to complex queries, a user can't get any help from a drop-down box and pick columns. It would be great if some improvements could be made in the aforementioned area concerning the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive"

"The solution is cheaper than Cosmos DB."

"Its subscription cost is lower than similar databases offered by other vendors."

"Amazon DynamoDB is not an expensive solution."

"Amazon DynamoDB is cheap."

"We previously paid around $20,000 a month for MongoDB, and now we're paying just $4,000 monthly for Amazon DynamoDB."

"Amazon DynamoDB is a cheap solution."

"It is a little expensive."

More Amazon DynamoDB pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

University

14%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon DynamoDB?

We don't have to administer the tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon DynamoDB?

The user interface could be improved to make it more intuitive. From a design and solution perspective, it's really good, but the interface always has room for enhancement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon DynamoDB?

We use Amazon DynamoDB for data lookups with the consultancy.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud Bigtable?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Bigtable?

The lagging problem of the product I face is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the performance of the product needs improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Bigtable?

When a client gives our organization a project where they need a dashboard for their company, they provide us with some data from their database, which is usually presented in Google Cloud Bigtable...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon Keyspaces vs Amazon DynamoDB

Compared 45% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Amazon DynamoDB

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon Neptune vs Amazon DynamoDB

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon DocumentDB vs Amazon DynamoDB

Compared 9% of the time

More Amazon DynamoDB Competitors

Amazon Timestream vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 39% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 27% of the time

MongoDB vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 19% of the time

More Google Cloud Bigtable Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon DynamoDB

April 2025

Download Amazon DynamoDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed NoSQL Databases

April 2025

Download Google Cloud Bigtable product report

Overview

Amazon DynamoDB is a scalable NoSQL database valued for its speed and cost efficiency, adept in handling unstructured data and delivering fast data retrieval without predefined schemas.

Amazon DynamoDB is recognized for seamless integration with AWS services and its ability to accommodate large datasets. It provides powerful performance with automatic scaling, JSON document storage, and requires no external configurations. Users appreciate the predictable performance and ease of use, although the documentation lacks clarity, and local access necessitates third-party tools. Complex queries can be challenging due to limited API options. Desired improvements include better integration with other services and an enhanced interface. The cost structure and data storage limitations present challenges with improvements needed in backup, restore, caching, and query performance.

What are the standout features of Amazon DynamoDB?

Scalability: Automatically adjusts capacity to accommodate workloads.
Integration: Seamless with various AWS services for comprehensive solutions.
NoSQL Flexibility: Adapts to diverse unstructured data needs.
JSON Storage: Stores and manages data in JSON format efficiently.
Automatic Scaling: Ensures efficient resource usage and cost management.

Which benefits should users consider in reviews?

Performance: Provides fast and efficient data retrieval.
Cost Efficiency: Manages data storage costs effectively.
Ease of Use: Offers a straightforward setup and management experience.
Flexibility: Adaptable to different data requirements and workloads.

Amazon DynamoDB is implemented in industries for IoT data management, weather data storage, localization automation, and large stream indexing. It's utilized for user data management in web services and e-commerce, providing high-performance, scalable storage solutions. Companies benefit from serverless architecture, JSON storage, and integration with Lambda for optimized data handling.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cloud Bigtable is Google's NoSQL Big Data database service. It's the same database that powers many core Google services, including Search, Analytics, Maps, and Gmail.

Google

Sample Customers

Samsung, Snapchat, Capital One, Expedia, Tinder, Airbnb, Comcast, Lyft, Redfin, Netflix, Adobe

Cognite, Dow Jones, Loblaw Digital

Buyer's Guide

Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon DynamoDB vs. Google Cloud Bigtable report.

See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.