GNU Make vs Harness comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GNU Logo
230 views|189 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Harness Logo
2,387 views|1,869 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GNU Make and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"GNU Make is such an essential tool that it is almost impossible to imagine working without it. Not having it, developers would probably have to resort to doing everything manually or via shell scripts.""Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as one wishes, and declarative approach fits the task really well. Wide adoption also means that everybody knows what GNU Make is and how to use it.""Setup is extremely straightforward.""I have not encountered any scalability issues with GNU Make. It is as scalable as the project's structure is, and then some.""Makefiles are extremely easy to work with using any preferred editor. GNU Make can be run directly from the terminal, not requiring any time wasted on clicking."

More GNU Make Pros →

"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."

More Harness Pros →

Cons
"GNU Make requires using the Tab symbol as the first symbol of command line for execution. In some text editors this can be problematic, as they automatically insert spaces instead of tabs.""Vanilla GNU Make does not support any kind of colored output. A wrapper named colormake exists to work around this, but native (opt-in) support would be welcome."

More GNU Make Cons →

"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."

More Harness Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is no price for this product. No licensing. It’s open-source."
  • "GNU Make is free and open source software."
  • More GNU Make Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.
    Top Answer:The platform's initial setup process could be simplified. Additionally, security features and capabilities for understanding vulnerabilities within the application could be enhanced directly from the… more »
    Top Answer:We use Harness for deploying Kubernetes clusters. It is a SaaS-based tool with a good graphical user interface. We can create workflows and deployment pipelines and easily visualize them. We can see… more »
    Ranking
    25th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    230
    Comparisons
    189
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    8th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    2,387
    Comparisons
    1,869
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 71% of the time.
    Bazel logo
    Compared 29% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    TeamCity logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Learn More
    Harness
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

    Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Healthcare Company5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GNU Make is ranked 25th in Build Automation while Harness is ranked 8th in Build Automation with 1 review. GNU Make is rated 8.2, while Harness is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of GNU Make writes "Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". GNU Make is most compared with Jenkins and Bazel, whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and GitHub Actions.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.