

Harness and Tekton compete in the CI/CD platform market. Harness often gains the upper hand due to its ease of use and robust features, while Tekton appeals to teams needing high customization.
Features: Harness provides automated Canary and Blue-Green deployments, intuitive cloud cost management, and straightforward UI for simplified workflows. Tekton offers pipeline modularity and integrates seamlessly with existing DevOps tools, emphasizing flexibility and adaptability. Harness is user-friendly, whereas Tekton serves teams craving customization.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Harness offers a fast deployment model with extensive customer support, making it suitable for teams with limited technical resources. Tekton requires a technical setup but fosters a community-driven approach, benefiting teams with internal expertise and innovation. Harness's strong customer service and detailed guides provide an advantage.
Pricing and ROI: Harness involves a higher setup cost, offering clear ROI through reduced deployment time and minimized risks. Tekton, being open-source, presents a low initial cost but demands investment in development resources for complex pipelines. Harness focuses on managed efficiency, while Tekton's affordability comes with increased in-house management requirements.
By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
I believe the efficiency improvement is more than a twenty to thirty percent increase compared to Jenkins.
We have not faced any customer support issues, with tickets resolved in less than a four-day SLA.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
We have been receiving incident reports whenever an incident occurs on Harness, and they are usually quick to respond.
Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.
It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.
Currently, out of twenty teams that are supposed to adopt it, five or six have adopted Harness, and we have not seen any kind of scalability issues, such as slowness in performance or build time reduction.
Harness is completely stable, and we are using it in production without facing any stability issues at all.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Harness is decently stable.
Stability-wise, it is very stable, and we can seamlessly integrate.
There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code.
Harness can be improved by providing more clarity on the credits it issues for Harness Cloud, as it has a tiered pricing structure involving license and credit costs, which can get confusing.
Previously, when deploying a version that had been deployed successfully before, it sometimes failed upon trying again, which seems to be an intermittent issue about stability.
Scalability means based on the load, it will automatically gain resources and run.
From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.
Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.
One of the best features Harness offers is the ability to templatize pipelines.
Harness offers several best features that I have worked with, including an intelligent caching system for dependencies and artifact building that allows for extremely short build times without extra bash scripting.
Tekton is quite built on top of Kubernetes, so the learning curve is minimal.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tekton | 6.6% |
| Harness | 5.3% |
| Other | 88.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.
Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.