CloudBees vs GNU Make comparison

CloudBees and GNU are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CloudBees is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while GNU is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0. CloudBees holds a 1.5% mindshare in BA, compared to GNU’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of GNU users who would recommend it.

CloudBees

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

993 Views
794 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GNU Make

Read 6 GNU Make reviews

250 Views
250 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

CloudBees

GNU Make

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

GNU Make and CloudBees are competing in the software build automation category. CloudBees appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive features and enterprise-level capabilities.

Features: GNU Make is simple and efficient, utilizing minimal configuration for complex builds. It's highly flexible for users familiar with scripting. CloudBees provides scalability for complex pipelines, advanced security, seamless integrations, and supports multiple Jenkins instances, making it suitable for large teams.

Room for Improvement: GNU Make could improve by offering GUI and easier integration methods. CloudBees needs to handle plugin version mismatches better, streamline initial setup processes, and enhance support for older Jenkins versions to avoid compatibility issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GNU Make is easy to deploy in existing projects but requires manual integration setups. CloudBees simplifies deployment with a cloud-native approach, offering excellent support and onboarding services, making it easy to deploy and use.

Pricing and ROI: GNU Make is cost-effective as free software, ideal for small to mid-sized projects. CloudBees requires a higher initial investment but offers a potentially high ROI through its extensive enterprise-grade features and comprehensive support, making it valuable for larger projects.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. GNU Make Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. GNU Make

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees

Ranking in Build Automation

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), DevSecOps (5th)

GNU Make

Ranking in Build Automation

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 1.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GNU Make is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani

Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB

Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes

Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.

Read full review

reviewer2561757

Software at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Enhances productivity with efficient dependency handling and a straightforward setup

GNU Make is used as a build system tool. Most people don't use GNU Make directly but utilize other systems like CMake to generate Make files, which are then run by GNU Make. This is common for tasks like compiling C++ code. In the industry, AI developers, for example, use GNU Make in their work…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One recent product feature that stands out is the pipeline explorer, which is providing significant value for us right now."

"The most beneficial aspect is that CloudBees integrates with everything, like version one, GitHub, and PDM."

"The customer support is good. You get good representatives from CloudBees to help you and understand your requirements."

"CloudBees is the Jenkins tool for building and deploying. There's open-source Jenkins, which is free and can be used by any organization, but it offers a different architecture for Jenkins. If your organization is larger, you might choose the architecture. This way, you can have different masters for different applications, and different teams can manage their masters separately. However, a single person can still control all the masters, whoever manages it for the organization."

"CloudBees assists by automating tasks, previously done manually, in the pipeline setup."

"It can manage multiple Jenkins instances."

"The most valuable features are Java features, microservice communication, payment validation, Jenkins Sonar, management master to CloudBees, Blue Ocean, JobConfig, and support."

"The initial setup is easy."

More CloudBees pros

"Makefiles are extremely easy to work with using any preferred editor. GNU Make can be run directly from the terminal, not requiring any time wasted on clicking."

"GNU Make is such an essential tool that it is almost impossible to imagine working without it. Not having it, developers would probably have to resort to doing everything manually or via shell scripts."

"Setup is extremely straightforward."

"The initial setup of GNU Make is straightforward."

"Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as one wishes, and declarative approach fits the task really well. Wide adoption also means that everybody knows what GNU Make is and how to use it."

"I have not encountered any scalability issues with GNU Make. It is as scalable as the project's structure is, and then some."

Cons

"The user interface of CloudBees is good but could be even more intuitive. Improving the user-friendliness of the interface and having simpler setup configurations would greatly benefit new users."

"If you're logged in and working for about thirty minutes and then go idle for five to ten minutes, Jenkins will prompt you to re-authenticate."

"We've noticed occasional issues with folder permissions changing unexpectedly. Specifically, permissions sometimes shift from the CloudBees user to the root user. This can cause pipeline failures, as pipelines require the correct CloudBees user permissions to execute properly."

"There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. W"

"I think a preview of the errors would be good just at the point where the error occurs."

"It could improve the document upload process."

"Sometimes, there are performance issues, however, they may be due to our organization's configuration."

"One challenge I'd like to highlight is that with CloudBees CI growing bigger and bigger, there are limitations in terms of managing old plugins and services and upgrading them with time."

More CloudBees cons

"GNU Make requires using the Tab symbol as the first symbol of command line for execution. In some text editors this can be problematic, as they automatically insert spaces instead of tabs."

"GNU Make does not provide traditional customer support."

"Vanilla GNU Make does not support any kind of colored output. A wrapper named colormake exists to work around this, but native (opt-in) support would be welcome."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"GNU Make is free and open source software."

"There is no price for this product. No licensing. It’s open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Legal Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GNU Make?

GNU Make is a free solution that comes with Linux, which positively impacts operational costs by eliminating licensing fees.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GNU Make?

I am not familiar enough with it to suggest any specific new features or areas for improvement. It occupies its niche well.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GNU Make?

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 43% of the time

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 21% of the time

Tekton vs CloudBees

Compared 13% of the time

Jenkins vs CloudBees

Compared 12% of the time

Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees

Compared 12% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

Jenkins vs GNU Make

Compared 68% of the time

Bazel vs GNU Make

Compared 32% of the time

More GNU Make Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees

August 2025

Download CloudBees product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

July 2025

Download GNU Make product report

Overview

CloudBees DevOptics is a robust software utilized primarily to enhance CI/CD processes by offering real-time visibility into Jenkins pipelines. It facilitates effective monitoring, incident management, and decision-making through comprehensive data analysis. Users value its features like DevOps performance metrics and seamless tool integration, leading to improved operational efficiency and productivity in organizations.

CloudBees

Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

GNU

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. GNU Make

July 2025

Free Report: CloudBees vs. GNU Make

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. GNU Make and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBees vs. GNU Make report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.