Harness vs Jenkins comparison

Harness and Jenkins are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Harness is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Jenkins is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Harness holds a 6.6% mindshare in BA, compared to Jenkins’s 8.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Harness users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Jenkins users who would recommend it.

Harness

Read 5 Harness reviews

2,408 Views
1,926 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

Read 92 Jenkins reviews

3,369 Views
3,302 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Harness

Jenkins

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Jenkins and Harness compete in the continuous integration and delivery space. Jenkins, favored for cost and support, shows strengths in customization, while Harness stands out in features, offering value through advanced automation and analytics.

Features: Jenkins offers open-source accessibility, an extensive plugin ecosystem, and high customization potential. Harness, contrastingly, provides advanced automation capabilities, robust analytics tools, and seamless workflow integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins requires a complex setup and maintenance, reflective of its evolving community-driven support. Harness simplifies deployment with dedicated customer service, emphasizing ease of use and reliable assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins's open-source model reduces initial costs, appealing to organizations capable of handling its complexities, enhancing its ROI. Harness, despite its higher upfront investment, promises quicker returns through enhanced productivity via advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Harness vs. Jenkins Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Harness vs. Jenkins

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Harness

Ranking in Build Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (17th), Cloud Cost Management (8th)

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Harness is 6.6%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 8.4%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jenkins	8.4%
Harness	6.6%
Other	85.0%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Linwei Yuan

Software Engineer at Citi

Streamline microservices deployment with integrated execution pipelines and comprehensive monitoring

Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place. It is very convenient since we have many microservices, so having one platform for all of them is beneficial. The dashboard allows me to monitor all core services' deployment status in one place, making it easier to find bugs and check logs.

Read full review

AllenUmlas

Engineer at Etisalat

Streamlines the CI/CD process with its user-friendly interface, extensive plugin ecosystem and efficient automation capabilities

Jenkins is incredibly user-friendly, so I haven't encountered any difficulties using it. It's the only product I've used for automation, but I find it to be very intuitive and effective. Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes. We're leveraging Jenkins to automate tasks related to Telco, particularly in upgrading the manual orchestration. It's a critical tool for streamlining our operations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place, making it convenient."

"The features of Harness are valuable, supporting rolling deployments, basic deployments, and blue-green deployments with zero downtime."

"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."

"Harness starts integrating with organizations, making everything automated without the need for manual interruption."

"Everything in Harness is configured and runs smoothly."

"Jenkins is free and open source."

"Jenkins's automation and orchestration features have significantly improved workflows by automating various processes. Initially, it did not support YAML manifesting or GitOps, but recent versions have introduced these capabilities. Now, the tool supports importing manifest files from Git repositories, enabling the implementation of GitOps pipelines. Compared to other tools like GitLab, it has become a mature tool for running CI/CD pipelines."

"The auto-schedule feature is valuable. Another valuable feature is that Jenkins does not trigger a build when there is no change in any of the systems. Jenkins also supports most of the open-source plug-ins."

"Jenkins' most valuable feature is Pipeline."

"It is open source, flexible, scalable, and easy to use. It is easy to maintain for the administrator. It is a continuous integration tool, and its enterprise version is quite mature. It has good integrations and plug-ins. Azure DevOps can also be integrated with Jenkins."

"The solution is scalable and has a large number of plugins that can help you scale it to your needs."

"We really appreciate that this solution is plug and play. When coding in the version control system, this product completes the build process automatically."

"Jenkins's open-based framework is very valuable."

More Jenkins pros

Cons

"When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur. Improvements are needed when deploying one component to one environment."

"Even with automation, there's a requirement for manual change requests for approvals."

"I prefer the previous less compact UI version of Harness, which showed more details on the screen."

"Harness setup and configurations could be made easier to configure, which would be helpful."

"When integrating Harness with more than twenty applications in one place, it becomes less stable, causing improvements to be necessary."

"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."

"Jenkins can improve by continuing to add additional plugins for all the new solutions that are coming out within the cloud sphere."

"It does not have a very user-friendly interface."

"The bug fix speed is very slow."

"Logging could be improved to offer a clearer view."

"The major drawback with Jenkins is the lack of support."

"The documentation is not helpful, as it is not user-friendly."

"Support should be provided at no cost, as there is no free support available for any of the free versions."

"The documentation could be more friendly, and more examples of how to use it."

More Jenkins cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Jenkins is an open-source tool."

"It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."

"I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There is not a license required to use the solution because it is open-source."

"We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support."

"The tool is open-source."

"Jenkins is open source."

"In our company, we do pay for the licensing of the solution."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Harness?

It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harness?

Harness setup and configurations could be made easier to configure, which would be helpful.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Harness?

In Harness, we are basically using Canary type deployments. We have applications, web applications, and web servers. Whenever we get the WAR file with 50 servers in a load balancer, Harness will de...

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs Harness

Compared 20% of the time

TeamCity vs Harness

Compared 11% of the time

Tekton vs Harness

Compared 9% of the time

GitLab vs Harness

Compared 9% of the time

Bamboo vs Harness

Compared 7% of the time

More Harness Competitors

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 16% of the time

TeamCity vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

JFrog Pipeline vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 7% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 7% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Harness

October 2025

Download Harness product report

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

October 2025

Download Jenkins product report

Also Known As

Armory

No data available

Overview

Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.

Harness

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

Sample Customers

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Buyer's Guide

Harness vs. Jenkins

November 2025

Free Report: Harness vs. Jenkins

Find out what your peers are saying about Harness vs. Jenkins and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Harness vs. Jenkins report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.