GitLab vs Harness comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
9,891 views|7,811 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Harness Logo
2,365 views|1,885 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitLab and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is stable.""Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place.""GitLab is a solution for source code management, container registry, pipelines, testing, and deployment.""GitLab's best feature is Actions.""The scalability is good.""I like GitLab's security and SAS tools.""The most important features of GitLab for us are issue management and all the CI/CD tools. Another aspect that I love about GitLab is the UI.""The most valuable feature of GitLab is the ability to upload scripts and make changes when needed and then reupload them. Additionally, the solution is user-friendly."

More GitLab Pros →

"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."

More Harness Pros →

Cons
"I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities.""This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications.""There is a need to improve or adopt AI into the ecosystem like a co-pilot, which Microsoft has done with GitHub.""The documentation could be improved to help newcomers better understand things like creating new branches.""We would like to generate document pages from the sources.""We have only seen a couple of issues on Gitlab, which we use for building some of the applications.""We do face issues in our company when we run out of disk space.""It could have more security integrations and the ability to check the vulnerability of the code. I don't think it is a responsibility of Gitlab, but it would be nice to have more options to integrate with."

More GitLab Cons →

"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."

More Harness Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:GitLab could consider introducing a code-scanning tool. Purchasing such tools from external markets can incur charges, which might not be favorable. Integrating these features into GitLab would… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    1st
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    9,891
    Comparisons
    7,811
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    8.6
    12th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    2,365
    Comparisons
    1,885
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 48% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 23% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    TeamCity logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Cloudability logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    Harness
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.

    Sample Customers
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Healthcare Company4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 70 reviews while Harness is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 1 review. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Harness is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, SonarQube and Tekton, whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and Cloudability.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.