Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitLab vs KiSSFLOW comparison

GitLab and KiSSFLOW are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. GitLab is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6, while KiSSFLOW is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.6. GitLab holds a 3.5% mindshare in RADS, compared to KiSSFLOW’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of KiSSFLOW users who would recommend it.
GitLab
Read 85 GitLab reviews
  • 1,463 Views
  • 1,201 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
KiSSFLOW
Read 12 KiSSFLOW reviews
  • 690 Views
  • 171 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

KiSSFLOW and GitLab compete in workflow automation and DevOps lifecycle management. GitLab is generally seen as more robust due to its comprehensive features, while KiSSFLOW is sought after for its affordability and support options.

Features: KiSSFLOW is distinguished by its user-friendly business process automation, customizable integrations, and capability for virtual approvals. GitLab offers extensive DevOps functionality, including CI/CD automation, version control, and robust security features, making it ideal for complex DevOps needs.

Room for Improvement: KiSSFLOW can enhance scalability, API integration, and automate complex workflows. GitLab could improve by simplifying its interface, reducing resource intensity for deployment, and expanding feature accessibility for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KiSSFLOW features an easy deployment model accessible even for organizations with limited IT expertise and provides strong customer service. GitLab's deployment is complex, requiring skilled technical resources but offers substantial support and detailed documentation to guide implementation.

Pricing and ROI: KiSSFLOW is cost-effective with lower upfront costs, ensuring strong ROI for smaller organizations or simple automation needs. GitLab has higher setup costs but promises significant returns by reducing development time and boosting productivity, serving well larger organizations needing comprehensive DevOps services.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. KiSSFLOW Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
GitLab vs. KiSSFLOW
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
GitLab enhances ROI through time-saving, cost-effectiveness, improved security, and agility, reducing time to market in the SDLC process.
Sentiment score
9.1
KiSSFLOW improved efficiency, reduced costs, enhanced transparency, and boosted productivity with easy adoption and excellent customer support.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the KiSSFLOW report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
GitLab's customer support varies, with paid options offering better service and satisfaction depending on user needs and resources.
Sentiment score
7.5
KiSSFLOW customer service is responsive, offering fast resolution, detailed documentation, and knowledgeable support through emails and scheduled meetings.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the KiSSFLOW report
Gaurav Chandel - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2603940 - PeerSpot reviewerMikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
GitLab is praised for scalability, with challenges in specific deployments but generally adaptable to growing company needs.
Sentiment score
7.3
KiSSFLOW is praised for its scalability and integration, handling large user bases and supporting operations smoothly with minimal maintenance.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the KiSSFLOW report
Sarfaraz Khan - PeerSpot reviewerRohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewerMikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
GitLab is praised for its stability and reliability, with minimal issues and high availability, ensuring user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
8.3
KiSSFLOW is praised for its stability, reliability, consistent performance, minimal issues, and trustworthy analytics, ensuring high user confidence.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the KiSSFLOW report
 

Room For Improvement

GitLab users desire better integrations, reporting, CI/CD capabilities, enhanced UI, AI features, and clarity on pricing and licensing.
KiSSFLOW users seek better integrations, enhanced UI, improved Google Drive syncing, real-time linking, editable PDFs, and stable mobile notifications.
It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
GitLab is a great tool for developers, it lacks project planner features.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the KiSSFLOW report
Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2603940 - PeerSpot reviewerRaveen Aggarwal - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

GitLab provides free and paid plans with extensive features, with pricing starting at $19, appealing to scaling enterprises.
KiSSFLOW provides subscription-based pricing at $15/user/month, higher than competitors, with no setup costs and free trials available.
The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the KiSSFLOW report
AS
Andrea PICCININI - PeerSpot reviewerSarfaraz Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

GitLab is favored for its user-friendly CI/CD, seamless integration, robust management, collaboration, automation, security, and flexibility.
KiSSFLOW's strengths include performance, user-friendliness, flexibility, integrations, automation, drag-and-drop system, community support, and AI-suggested fields.
It helped me personally and my team to save time and money.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the KiSSFLOW report
Sriya Sainath - PeerSpot reviewerAndrea PICCININI - PeerSpot reviewerRohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

GitLab
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
85
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (10th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)
KiSSFLOW
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
15th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (6th), Business Process Management (BPM) (8th), Low-Code Development Platforms (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitLab is 3.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KiSSFLOW is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements
The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
Read full review
Julius Jagdon - PeerSpot reviewer
The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver
When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user. For example, our RSN needs to approve the ticket first before it's moved to the next person rather than having them all grouped. It would be better if we could see all the tickets grouped at the same time.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
12%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Wholesaler/Distributor
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?
I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?
The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with GitLab?
One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...
See all answers
What do you like most about KiSSFLOW?
The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KiSSFLOW?
The license is very expensive. However, there are no additional costs to the standard license.
See all answers
What needs improvement with KiSSFLOW?
One area where Kissflow can be improved is customization, specifically, the ability to modify the input fields, UI, and design elements. Currently, it's not possible to alter the colors or make the...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab
Compared 24% of the time
GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab Logo
GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab
Compared 16% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab
Compared 6% of the time
TeamCity vs GitLab Logo
TeamCity vs GitLab
Compared 5% of the time
Tekton vs GitLab Logo
Tekton vs GitLab
Compared 5% of the time
More GitLab Competitors
ServiceNow vs KiSSFLOW Logo
ServiceNow vs KiSSFLOW
Compared 24% of the time
Camunda vs KiSSFLOW Logo
Camunda vs KiSSFLOW
Compared 20% of the time
Nintex Process Platform vs KiSSFLOW Logo
Nintex Process Platform vs KiSSFLOW
Compared 19% of the time
Microsoft Power Apps vs KiSSFLOW Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs KiSSFLOW
Compared 19% of the time
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs KiSSFLOW Logo
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs KiSSFLOW
Compared 17% of the time
More KiSSFLOW Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
GitLab
June 2025
GitLab reportDownload GitLab product report
Buyer's Guide
KiSSFLOW
June 2025
KiSSFLOW reportDownload KiSSFLOW product report
 

Also Known As

Fuzzit
No data available
 

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab
KiSSFLOW understands that you know how to solve your office chaos problems better than anyone else. That’s why they created a cloud-based platform to help business leaders create, modify, and use automated business applications. You can make each application with beautiful, easy-to-use, and modern technology. You get the functionality of high-end BPM software with no coding or complicated mapping required, so you don’t have be a programmer to create amazing applications.
KiSSFLOW
 

Sample Customers

1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
KiSSFLOW has 1.3 million users and 10,000+ customers across 121 countries. The people who get the most out of KiSSFLOW are business leaders like department heads, senior managers, and process owners who want to automate repetitive processes. These people can set up and modify the application on their own. The interface is simple so that all the users in the organization can utilize it through the web application, mobile apps (iOS and Android), smart actions on Gmail, and email notifications. Notable companies are Royal Caribbean, Dominos, Motorola, Danone, The Telegraph, Michelin, and PepsiCo.
Buyer's Guide
GitLab vs. KiSSFLOW
June 2025
Free Report: GitLab vs. KiSSFLOW
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. KiSSFLOW and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our GitLab vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.