Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs WatchGuard AuthPoint MFA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator
Ranking in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (7th), Authentication Systems (3rd), Identity Management (IM) (10th)
WatchGuard AuthPoint MFA
Ranking in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Authorization Software (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is 13.8%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard AuthPoint MFA is 0.8%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator13.8%
WatchGuard AuthPoint MFA0.8%
Other85.4%
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
 

Featured Reviews

Yonas Abebe - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network and Security Engineer at Symbol Technologies PLC
Integration capabilities simplify authentication and migration challenges need addressing
The integration capabilities of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator are very interesting, as it can be integrated with third-party devices easily and is straightforward to configure. The integration with FortiToken is outstanding, adding a layer of security for authentication. In addition, it can be used by integrating with zero trust single access, enhancing overall security measures.
reviewer2245134 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Includes many security features and provides push notification feature
Technical support needs more people who have good technical skills and knowledge instead of just sharing documentation. We can refer to the documentation from our end. It will be easy for us to troubleshoot if they have someone with knowledge of how these boxes work. We contact technical support when we can't find the issue after referring to the documentation. So, when they offer us documentation, it makes no sense. We need someone with that knowledge level to understand the issue and at least recommend what needs to be done. Documentation sharing is something I can agree with. However, they share the document for any issue and ask us to refer to it. Having a TAC in place doesn't make sense if they don't want to resolve something in real time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Fulfilled our requirement at a good price."
"The most important feature is the security capability because it provides a substantial amount of security for admin-related activities."
"The product is stable and reliable."
"I appreciate its ability to provide multi-factor authentication, but it's primarily focused on this function."
"The technical support for FortiAuthenticator is excellent."
"It keeps track of users and their IPs no matter where they are in the network. When users roam, we don't have to worry about not mapping them to an IP."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an easy-to-use solution."
"The product enables SSO."
"The WatchGuard firewall includes many security features, such as UDP, block filters, web filtering, and GeoBlock."
"The integrations are good."
"Personal notifications are very easy to use."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"The token-based two-factor verification (2FA) for user logins is valuable. It's the primary reason we use AuthPoint, and I find it very effective."
"It can be implemented as an app on the phone, rather than with a hardware token."
"The approvals feature of this solution is very good; it is operated by just one button, and can be controlled from a mobile device if needed."
 

Cons

"I would like to see more ways to authenticate, such as adding facial recognition to the two-factor, where you log into your phone or another device."
"Other features that would improve the product are a single sign-on where people can use their Gmail ID to log-in, etc."
"There are multiple areas that are in need of improvement. It is not a mature product."
"The product must provide 2FA for applications."
"I would like to see integration and customization capabilities with the end-user portal to solve authentication issues with diverse implementation scenarios."
"Integration with some other enterprise applications could be improved."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"One thing I dislike is that if you have the software authenticator on a mobile device and that device is lost, it's difficult to remove."
"It's not so simple to configure."
"Locking could be enhanced to be GDPR compliant."
"The product must enable administrators to restrict the privileges of remote users."
"It has been really great. We don't have any complaints about it at all. We've only had one or two very minor glitches, and they were just in passing."
"We would like the zero trust feature of this solution to be completed, with more details added and more laptop management capability."
"My only concern is the segmentation of services, which I understand is common in SaaS."
"The solution should implement a tagging process, which will provide an extra layer of security for the devices connected to the VPN."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has affordable pricing compared to other vendors."
"The product could be more competitively priced."
"I price of the solution is expensive."
"The solution is not very expensive."
"The customers need to pay for licenses, and some pay on a yearly basis while others pay on a three-yearly or five-yearly basis. Also, it is not an expensive solution."
"The cost of the license could be less expensive. The license is paid on a yearly basis."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the pricing a seven."
"When we buy the Fortinet FortiAuthenticator device there is a comparison between price and security."
"We got the product at a low price."
"The pricing, I believe, is around $3 a user a year. It is quite reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business38
Midsize Enterprise18
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator could benefit from some artificial intelligence functionality and resolution of some glitches that may exist.
What needs improvement with WatchGuard AuthPoint?
It's so simple to configure. We have integration with the WatchGuard firewall.
 

Also Known As

FortiAuthenticator
AuthPoint
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Ellips, Mednet, Diecutstickers.com, Fletchers Solicitors
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. WatchGuard AuthPoint MFA and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.