Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs WatchGuard AuthPoint MFA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator
Ranking in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (7th), Authentication Systems (3rd), Identity Management (IM) (10th)
WatchGuard AuthPoint MFA
Ranking in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Authorization Software (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is 13.3%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard AuthPoint MFA is 0.9%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator13.3%
WatchGuard AuthPoint MFA0.9%
Other85.8%
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
 

Featured Reviews

Yonas Abebe - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network and Security Engineer at Symbol Technologies PLC
Integration capabilities simplify authentication and migration challenges need addressing
The integration capabilities of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator are very interesting, as it can be integrated with third-party devices easily and is straightforward to configure. The integration with FortiToken is outstanding, adding a layer of security for authentication. In addition, it can be used by integrating with zero trust single access, enhancing overall security measures.
reviewer2245134 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Includes many security features and provides push notification feature
Technical support needs more people who have good technical skills and knowledge instead of just sharing documentation. We can refer to the documentation from our end. It will be easy for us to troubleshoot if they have someone with knowledge of how these boxes work. We contact technical support when we can't find the issue after referring to the documentation. So, when they offer us documentation, it makes no sense. We need someone with that knowledge level to understand the issue and at least recommend what needs to be done. Documentation sharing is something I can agree with. However, they share the document for any issue and ask us to refer to it. Having a TAC in place doesn't make sense if they don't want to resolve something in real time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is stable and reliable."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it easy to install. The user experience is very good."
"It is used for SSO, single sign-on, and as a captive portal."
"We are using Fortinet FortiAuthenticator to implement token-based authentication for wireless network access."
"The logs have great detail that make it easier to evaluate and control the security environment."
"The implementation has significantly improved access management within our organization."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication."
"The product's on-premise version doesn't have recurring costs."
"It can be implemented as an app on the phone, rather than with a hardware token."
"The integrations are good."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"The approvals feature of this solution is very good; it is operated by just one button, and can be controlled from a mobile device if needed."
"The token-based two-factor verification (2FA) for user logins is valuable. It's the primary reason we use AuthPoint, and I find it very effective."
"The WatchGuard firewall includes many security features, such as UDP, block filters, web filtering, and GeoBlock."
"Personal notifications are very easy to use."
 

Cons

"We've had some issues with integration."
"The solution's command line interface could be improved to provide better support for low-level debugging and advanced configurations."
"We have issues with HA (high availability). These should be addressed in future releases."
"If you want some other FortiAuthenticator from one site to another site, you should have requirements, but really if you have authentication and directory or another solution, you should change the password of the authenticator between the solution and the directory and other things. So transfer of data and other information should be simpler."
"The speed of deployment on the cloud could be improved. It took a few days when it should have been just two days"
"I don't have any issues with this solution, but it may need a better, more user-friendly interface or better design of the platform."
"The product must provide 2FA for applications."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"We would like the zero trust feature of this solution to be completed, with more details added and more laptop management capability."
"My only concern is the segmentation of services, which I understand is common in SaaS."
"The solution should implement a tagging process, which will provide an extra layer of security for the devices connected to the VPN."
"Locking could be enhanced to be GDPR compliant."
"It's not so simple to configure."
"The product must enable administrators to restrict the privileges of remote users."
"It has been really great. We don't have any complaints about it at all. We've only had one or two very minor glitches, and they were just in passing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the pricing a seven."
"The platform is cost-effective as it does not require a separate license for SD-WAN functionality."
"I rate the price of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator a three out of five."
"The pricing is fair."
"The platform provides a user-based pricing model rather than a subscription pricing model."
"When we buy the Fortinet FortiAuthenticator device there is a comparison between price and security."
"The licensing structure is cost-effective for us compared to some of the other solutions that have recurring monthly costs."
"It is usually cheap. Without a license, you can use some basic features. You can buy a 20-year license and implement the solution once."
"The pricing, I believe, is around $3 a user a year. It is quite reasonable."
"We got the product at a low price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) solutions are best for your needs.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business38
Midsize Enterprise18
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator could benefit from some artificial intelligence functionality and resolution of some glitches that may exist.
What needs improvement with WatchGuard AuthPoint?
It's so simple to configure. We have integration with the WatchGuard firewall.
 

Also Known As

FortiAuthenticator
AuthPoint
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Ellips, Mednet, Diecutstickers.com, Fletchers Solicitors
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. WatchGuard AuthPoint MFA and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.