Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ForgeRock vs SAP Customer Data Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ForgeRock
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (15th), Access Management (14th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (7th)
SAP Customer Data Cloud
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Social Login (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

ForgeRock and SAP Customer Data Cloud aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. ForgeRock is designed for Access Management and holds a mindshare of 6.0%, up 5.9% compared to last year.
SAP Customer Data Cloud, on the other hand, focuses on Social Login, holds 31.3% mindshare.
Access Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ForgeRock6.0%
Microsoft Entra ID17.4%
Okta Platform9.3%
Other67.3%
Access Management
Social Login Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP Customer Data Cloud31.3%
LoginRadius37.5%
Akamai Identity Cloud31.3%
Social Login
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Murat Ülker - PeerSpot reviewer
Devops Engineer and Trainer at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
Easy to use, but customizations can be complicated to handle
I would suggest others use the product after asking them to consider their use cases. SSO may be a use case for some, and using the product as an IDM tool may be a use case. At the moment, my company is not deploying all the components of ForgeRock itself. My company uses ForgeRock for OAuth 2.0. For example, my company is not deploying the IDM and identity gateway components. You should consider your use case and select the required components for that use case. My company does not use the SSO features of the tool. My company uses SSO to access ForgeRock's AM Console for individual users. My company does not use single sign on features of the product and instead, we use Auth0. I rate the tool a seven or eight out of ten.
reviewer1549194 - PeerSpot reviewer
Specialist Programmer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Customizable, enhances security, and the Consent Management functionality is helpful
Gigya is a CIAM that provides registration as a service. It can be used for setting up SSO or federated SSO between different sites. It also provides the solution for consent and preference management. Screens and automated emails to customers can be highly customized, and it also provides drag…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Installation and configuration are pretty easy for ForgeRock OpenIDM."
"This is a stable solution. When you do experience any issues, you will see it in your DB logs or audit logs so you can easily reach a conclusion of might be causing it."
"In terms of the tool's operational efficiency, ForgeRock Access Management is used in a lot of environments, different regions, and in different stages of production environments."
"ForgeRock has CIAM, which other products didn't have, and they have DevOps ready."
"It works very well, especially in Identity and Access Management. It helps detect anomalies in user behavior patterns."
"We create and define the permissions and configurations for the users."
"We have found the identity and access management tools in the solution to be particularly useful for our organization."
"Even though we have very small business interests with them today, they see that we plan on growing drastically over the next two years. Therefore, we have excellent support and we are now at a point where we are not calling tech support. We pick up a phone and call the Account Manager and they'll get everything resolved for us. We don't have to queue along with everybody else and go through a long process."
"SAP CDC is very easy to use and the best part about this tool is its documentation."
 

Cons

"The solution requires more simplified customization. However, part of the problem is my clients determining their own preferences. Technology can help and do many things, but you have to define your own policies to ensure that the solution or service works within those parameters. Helping customers understand their business and different processes is another issue not relating to the functionality of this solution."
"The solution could improve by adding more advertising and marketing."
"They should improve the solution by include reporting."
"The user interface could be improved as it is cumbersome and outdated. It doesn't have a responsive UI."
"It should be a little bit easier to implement. It is user-friendly, but there is always scope for improvement."
"I think the upgrade process is sometimes a little complicated and there are failures that occur."
"The only problem with ForgeRock is that it is derived from an open-source product, so sometimes it's a bit unstable."
"We would like this solution to be developed for use with mobile applications."
"I have struggled to give different access to different users in the same application."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is comparable to other products in the market."
"The pricing of the solution is fair but I do not have the full details."
"Its licensing is on a yearly basis, but it also depends on the contract that you have with the vendor. They have multiple types of contracts. There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees. If you need some of the features, you have to pay more."
"ForgeRock's pricing is more competitive than other products."
"It's a bit pricey and could be more competitive."
"The license is purchased annually per user. However, you can negotiate if you are signing for a longer period of time. When comparing this solution to others on the market it is priced fair, it is not at the top of the price range or at the bottom end."
"ForgeRock is an expensive solution."
"We have multiple clients we are looking at right now. We are at a very small number, however, the idea and the goal is to grow. We are looking at about $100,000 and $50,000 a minimum a month cost. That'd be minimum maybe in a couple of years."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
21%
Computer Software Company
11%
Retailer
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise13
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ForgeRock?
The most valuable features of ForgeRock are social login and data protection.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ForgeRock?
Our company was considering switching back to Keycloak from ForgeRock, so as to not pay any license fees. ForgeRock also supports M-PIN and biometric features that Keycloak does not provide. My com...
What needs improvement with ForgeRock?
In the past, I saw that Splunk was integrated with a testing portal, and then it was integrated with Slack. I don't think ForgeRock directly supports integrations with Slack, making it an area wher...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

ForgeRock Identity Platform, ForgeRock OpenIDM
Gigya Customer Identity Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Geico, Thomson Reuters, Salesforce, McKesson, Trinet, SKY, BNP Paribas, Deloitte, Capgemini, North Western University
Nutricia-Danone, ESI, Frontier Communications, Medialaan, Verizon Wireless, Talpa Media
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity and others in Access Management. Updated: January 2026.
880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.