SS&C Blue Prism vs erwin Data Modeler comparison

Quest Software and SS&C Technologies are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Quest Software is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4, while SS&C Technologies is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.8. Quest Software holds a 2.5% mindshare in BPD, compared to SS&C Technologies’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of SS&C Technologies users who would recommend it.

erwin Data Modeler

Read 46 erwin Data Modeler reviews

5,210 Views
1,563 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SS&C Blue Prism

Read 5 SS&C Blue Prism reviews

1,928 Views
270 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

erwin Data Modeler

SS&C Blue Prism

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Erwin Data Modeler and SS&C Blue Prism are products in the IT tools category; Erwin centers on data modeling, while Blue Prism focuses on automated business processes. Blue Prism is considered superior due to its comprehensive automation capabilities that many users find justifies its cost.

Features: Erwin offers an array of features critical for data modeling: the Bulk Editor allows quick batch changes within data models, the Reverse Engineering tool facilitates rapid conversion between databases and data model formats, and the Report Designer facilitates easy report creation for business discussions. SS&C Blue Prism delivers advanced automation features that enhance operational efficiency, boasts powerful integration capabilities, and includes a user-friendly design studio for building and monitoring automations.

Room for Improvement: Erwin needs better support for modern databases such as Postgres and cloud-native environments like Redshift, and its reverse engineering capabilities could benefit from speed improvements. Additional collaborative features within Erwin's workspace would enhance its usability. Blue Prism can improve on reducing the complexity of its initial setup, expanding language support beyond current offerings, and refining OCR integration for diverse document types.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Erwin's deployment is straightforward, supported by responsive customer service which ensures user satisfaction. Blue Prism requires a more detailed setup due to its complex features but offers comprehensive support for smoother deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Erwin provides a competitive pricing model, enabling a more rapid ROI primarily due to its focused functionality. In contrast, Blue Prism, though associated with higher initial costs, offers significant ROI benefits attributed to robust automation capabilities. Erwin's pricing is generally more accessible, but Blue Prism's investment is justified for businesses prioritizing automation.

To learn more, read our detailed SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

erwin Data Modeler

Ranking in Business Process Design

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (2nd), Data Governance (15th)

SS&C Blue Prism

Ranking in Business Process Design

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (16th), Process Automation (13th), Medical Insurance Claims Software (2nd), Insurance Claims Processing (3rd), Document Management Software (8th), Low-Code Development Platforms (14th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (11th), Loan Management Software (3rd), Document Automation Software (3rd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (19th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (8th), AI Finance & Accounting (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of erwin Data Modeler is 2.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SS&C Blue Prism is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
erwin Data Modeler	2.5%
SS&C Blue Prism	0.9%
Other	96.6%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Sushree Panigrahi

Snowflake Data Engineer| Senior PLSQL Developer |Data Modeler|Assitant Vice Pre at Jp Morgan Chase & Co.

Data modeling has transformed regulatory reporting and collaboration across cloud environments

In erwin Data Modeler, areas that have room for improvement include performance improvements. I see that large models sometimes cause it to be slow when opening. Impact analysis can lag as well. Version control is another aspect. If we have developed a current version, it is not integrated with Git where we can easily compare different versions. UI modernization is also something we cannot utilize as it is primarily for development. Additionally, cloud-specific optimizations are needed when it comes to Snowflake or Databricks. When it comes to AI aspects, auto-suggestions for normalization or identifying primary, foreign, or surrogate keys are areas that can be improved.

Read full review

VikasKumar16

Technical Auditor at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has defined complex workflows and handled detailed automation scenarios efficiently

It requires extensive knowledge if somebody wants to work on SS&C Blue Prism, compared to other tools. The downside is you need to be very aware of the tool. You need to know how to write the workflow and have a detailed understanding of SS&C Blue Prism. It takes more time to learn compared to other tools in the market which are more user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The logical model gives developers, as well as the data modelers, an understanding of exactly how each object interacts with the others, whether a one-to-many, many-to-many, many-to-one, etc."

"We can create mappings in erwin and possibly data dictionaries."

"There is absolutely no problem with the stability."

"The principal feature that I liked is that the solution has a very graphic interface."

"We find that its ability to generate database code from a model for a wide array of data sources cuts development time. The ability to create one model in your design phase and then have it generate DDL code for Oracle or Teradata, or whichever environment you need is really nice. It's not only nice but it also saves man-hours of time. You would have to take your design and just type in manually. It has to take days off out of the work."

"It allows us to create logical data models. We can represent a database model in business terms, which is very useful for us."

"I have worked with erwin Data Modeler for quite some time and familiarity is its most valuable feature."

"We use the macros with naming standards patterns, domains, datatypes, and some common attributes. As far as other automations, a feature of the Bulk Editor is mass updates. When it sees something is nonstandard or inaccurate, it will export the better data out. Then, I can easily see which entities and attributes are not inline or standard. I can easily make changes to what was uploaded to the Bulk Editor. When taking on a new project, it can save you about a half a day on a big project across an entire team."

More erwin Data Modeler pros

"I find the design studio, where I can build the automation, and the control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, to be the most useful."

"The key feature of SS&C that I find valuable is the general workflow visibility."

"We have a lot of customer requests on a daily basis for different use cases, and we have different processes for that."

"Some important features include the language capabilities, which are crucial since RPA has to read the documents provided by the customer."

Cons

"We can only get licenses through partners."

"We are planning to move, in 2021, into their server version, where multiple data modelers can work at the same time and share their models. It has become a pain point to merge the models from individual desktops and get them into a single data model, when multiple data modelers are working on a particular project. It becomes a nightmare for the senior data modeler to bring them together, especially when it comes to recreating them when you want to merge them."

"erwin generally fails to successfully reverse engineer our Oracle Databases into erwin data models. The way that they are engineered on our side, the syntax is correct from an Oracle perspective, but it seems to be very difficult for erwin to interpret. What I end up doing is using Oracle Data Modeler to reverse engineer into the Oracle data model, then forward engineer the DDL into an Oracle syntax, and importing that DDL into erwin in order to successfully bring in most of the information from our physical data models. That is a bit of a challenge."

"I would like the solution to be less rigid in terms of its theory."

"Complete Compare is set up only to compare properties that are of interest to us, but some of the differences cannot be brought over from one version of the model to another. This is despite the fact that we are clicking to bring objects from one place to another. Therefore, it's hard to tell at times if Complete Compare is working as intended without having to manually go into the details and check everything. If it could be redesigned to a degree where it is easier to use when we bring things over from one site to another and be sure that it's been done correctly, that would be nice to have. We would probably use the tool more often if the Complete Compare were easier to use."

"Some Source official systems give us DDLs to work with and they have contents not required to be part of the DDL before we reverse engineer in the erwin DM. Therefore, we manually make changes to those scripts and edit them, then reverse-engineer within the tool. So, it does take some time to edit these DDL scripts generated by the source operational systems. What I would suggest: It would be helpful if there were a place within the erwin tool to import the file and automatically eliminate all the unnecessary lines of code, and just have the clean code built-in to generate the table/data model."

"As erwin Data Modeler files get larger, the response time really slows down, and when I have multiple files open I sometimes get a glitch where a lot of the text fields get solid black and the first eight characters of column names might be blacked out with a rectangle."

"The price should be reduced."

More erwin Data Modeler cons

"There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C."

"Blue Prism is more costly than UiPath in terms of robotic licenses and orchestrators."

"I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The primary reasons that erwin was selected were that it was much more affordable for us [than Embarcadero] and it was easily maintainable."

"Though the solution is not cheap, it's worth the money."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"erwin has this option where you pay a one-time fee and you have the license for six years, which makes sense because I don't upgrade my database engine every other year. I have an application that depends on it. This is something weird about PowerDesigner. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"Likewise, the solution is a little pricey."

"Pricing is very high compared to any other product."

"I don't specifically know what we're paying now. About three years ago, in another organization, I have this memory of 6,000 AUD a seat or something like that, but I am not sure. In the mid-2000s, it was something like 1,200 AUD a seat. I get the impression that there was a price jump when it was spun off from CA as a separate company, which is understandable, but it could sometimes be a barrier in some organizations picking it up. I haven't talked to erwin people yet, but I'm going to suggest to them that they could perhaps think of having an entry-level product that is priced a bit lower, and then, you can buy the extra suite."

"The price of erwin Data Modeler is very expensive, in particular for this part of the world."

More erwin Data Modeler pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

18%

Retailer

17%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	34

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

Regarding pricing, I am unsure what the exact price is for erwin Data Modeler, but I believe it is not useful for an individual. It is more targeted toward an enterprise level since organizations l...

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

I write code and I write code accessing erwin Data Modeler's API, the Application Programming Interface, so that I can use Excel to update erwin Data Modeler and then get those updates and put them...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

I work for CVS with a pretty big database as a data modeler on the PBMs, the Caremark PBM side, which is the Pharmacy Benefits Manager. There's a retail side too for all the stores, but our data wa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SS&C Blue Prism?

The pricing was not particularly competitive. It wasn't flexible for different geographies. For instance, in Africa, they didn't have a different pricing model to account for affordability. The pri...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SS&C Blue Prism?

It requires extensive knowledge if somebody wants to work on SS&C Blue Prism, compared to other tools. The downside is you need to be very aware of the tool. You need to know how to write the w...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SS&C Blue Prism?

My main use case for SS&C Blue Prism is automating business processes in different areas of the company, for legacy application automations, for SAP, different web services, and we provide that...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 41% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 11% of the time

Lucidchart vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 7% of the time

Visio vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 5% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 4% of the time

More erwin Data Modeler Competitors

Alfresco vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 21% of the time

Camunda vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 9% of the time

FIS Commercial Lending Suite vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 7% of the time

More SS&C Blue Prism Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Modeler

January 2026

Download erwin Data Modeler product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

January 2026

Download SS&C Blue Prism product report

Also Known As

erwin DM

SS&C AWD

Overview

Erwin Data Modeler provides an effective approach to visualizing and managing data models. It assists in creating, reversing, and synchronizing data models with ease, supporting logical and physical transitions while enhancing understanding across teams.

Erwin Data Modeler is a comprehensive tool designed for professional database management. It offers capabilities to organize and enforce standards, automating script generation with robust reverse engineering and DDL output. Users can manage complex data environments, capitalize on integration with data intelligence, and maintain large-scale databases smoothly. Despite its strengths, improvements in multi-language support, database integration, and reporting features are needed. Users benefit from extensive support for conceptual, logical, and physical database modeling, enhancing architectural design and data governance for platforms like SQL Server, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Erwin Data Modeler?

Visual Representation: Facilitates clear visualization of data models, aiding comprehension.
Versioning and Editing: Enhance usability with versioning and bulk editing capabilities.
Reverse Engineering: Offers powerful tools for reverse engineering and DDL generation.
Integration: Aligns with data intelligence to streamline database management.
Naming Standards: Enforces consistency with automated script creation.

What benefits should users consider in Erwin Data Modeler reviews?

Collaboration: Promotes team understanding and collaboration through visual tools.
Automation: Reduces manual effort through automated processes and integration.
Scalability: Handles large database management efficiently, crucial for enterprise settings.
Data Governance: Facilitates effective data governance with structured modeling.

Erwin Data Modeler finds application in industries focused on robust data management, implementing it for enterprise data warehouses, business domain models, and operational systems. It supports architectural design and governance, aligning with business applications demanding precise data representation and visualization.

Quest Software

SS&C Blue Prism, renowned for its language capabilities and workflow design, supports detailed automation building, enhancing productivity. Despite some challenges like cost and limited integration, it offers substantial potential in automating diverse processes.

SS&C Blue Prism offers strong capabilities in document reading and a straightforward workflow design, making it accessible with basic BPM knowledge. Detailed automation design in the studio and effective monitoring in the control room are notable features. While facing higher costs and a steeper learning curve, it supports process mining and generative AI initiatives, crucial for industries aiming at transformation and activation services. Limited external system integration and lack of agile delivery encourage a strategic approach in its deployment.

What are the key features?

Strong Language Capabilities: Essential for document reading and interpretation.
Straightforward Workflow Design: Provides ease of use for individuals with basic BPM knowledge.
Detailed Automation Building: Design studio allows comprehensive workflow definitions and scenario planning.
Effective Monitoring: Control room supports detailed automation oversight.

What ROI should users expect?

Efficiency in Task Automation: Automates repetitive tasks in back-office services.
Enhanced Process Integration: Facilitates automation by integrating data inputs in insurance sectors.
Support for Process Mining: Aids in generative AI initiatives and process transformation.
Complex Project Management: Useful in managing large-scale migration projects.

SS&C Blue Prism finds its application across industries. In service industries, it automates repetitive tasks while supporting migration projects. Within the insurance sector, it helps automate claims handling and pricing by integrating data efficiently. Companies use it when transitioning processes, such as upgrading systems from older versions to new applications.

SS&C Technologies

Sample Customers

Premera, America Honda Motors, Aetna, Kaiser Permanente, Dental Dental Cali, Cigna, Staples

AWS, EY, Deloitte, ABBYY, Microsoft, GLYNT.AI, Pfizer, Invesco, Western Union

Buyer's Guide

SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler

December 2025

Free Report: SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler

Find out what your peers are saying about SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.