DX Performance Management vs NetCrunch comparison

Broadcom and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.5, while AdRem Software is ranked #81. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

728 Views
437 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

593 Views
421 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NetCrunch and DX Performance Management are competing in the network monitoring and management software domain. DX Performance Management is often seen as having an upper hand due to its superior functionalities, particularly for businesses seeking advanced solutions, while NetCrunch is preferred for its pricing and support.

Features: NetCrunch provides real-time network status monitoring, flexible alerting, and integrated monitoring that suit small to medium-sized networks. On the other hand, DX Performance Management offers in-depth analytics, application performance monitoring, and scalability that align well with larger enterprises.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch can enhance its analytics capabilities, user interface design, and expand its scalability options. DX Performance Management may improve its deployment ease, simplify its feature integration, and reduce its initial cost burden to attract a broader audience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, which appeals to those looking for a less complex setup. DX Performance Management has a more involved deployment process due to its intricate functionalities but supports comprehensive integration.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch generally offers a more competitive setup cost, leading to quicker ROI for smaller enterprises focused on essential monitoring. DX Performance Management typically requires a higher initial investment but offers significant long-term ROI for larger companies utilizing its advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. NetCrunch

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

59th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)

NetCrunch

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

81st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (28th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (64th), Log Management (70th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

Reginald Pierre

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past."

"It is very easy to add devices; just be aware that it requires SNMP to be enabled."

"We're able to present data from multiple back-end collection sources into a single dashboard for the users. So they don't have to go to multiple locations to get data about a particular item, or device."

"The integration to the other products that we use: NFA, we use ADA, we use Spectrum; and CAPM integrates all those into a single pane of glass."

"What is most useful is visibility."

"Since the implementation of the tool, it has cut down on probably 60% of our outages and letting us know what is going on."

"The ability to quickly do drag and drop customized reports for dashboards."

"The capability where not only the traditional SNMP information is captured but also the netflow data; who is consuming the data on the WAN, and voice-related information, is helpful. The voice quality makes it very easy for first- and second-line operators to see where the issue is, and who is impacted."

More DX Performance Management pros

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."

"Policies could be improved."

"This solution is not very scalable."

"I'm not a fan of many extra features since they usually burden the software and reduce its reliability."

"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."

"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."

"Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved."

"Product has issue collecting IP SLA data."

More DX Performance Management cons

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

Agriculture

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 31% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management

Compared 25% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 23% of the time

OmniPeek vs DX Performance Management

Compared 21% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 36% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs NetCrunch

Compared 21% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 17% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs NetCrunch

Compared 14% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs NetCrunch

Compared 13% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

August 2025

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2025

Download NetCrunch product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

NetCrunch is an all-in-one network monitoring platform designed for hybrid IT environments, offering comprehensive agentless monitoring of thousands of devices across different technologies and platforms.

NetCrunch streamlines network management with automated discovery, configuration, and monitoring through rule-defined policies. It covers monitoring across various environments, providing real-time dashboards, dynamic views, and topology maps. With its versatile features, it supports diverse IT ecosystems efficiently. It offers a node-based license model that enables scalable deployment on-prem, self-hosted in the cloud, or in hybrid settings.

What are NetCrunch's most important features?

Agentless Monitoring: Supports devices using SNMP, server metrics, virtualization, cloud platforms, and traffic flows.
Automated Discovery: Facilitates network configuration and monitoring via 670+ monitoring packs and sensors.
Advanced Alerting: Filters, delays, and correlates alerts to minimize false positives with configurable escalation paths.
Real-time Dashboards: Provides dynamic views and automatic topology maps reflecting device status and relationships.
Action Scripts: Offers 40+ actions like script execution and device reboot to manage network incidents.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from NetCrunch?

Scalability: Simplifies expansion with a node-based licensing model adapting to network growth.
Flexibility: Supports on-prem, cloud, or hybrid models for versatile deployment options.
Efficiency: Automates routine tasks reducing manual intervention and potential errors.
Reliability: Enhances monitoring accuracy with real-time updates and minimized false alerts.
Integration Capability: Works with email, SMS, and service integrations for streamlined communication.

NetCrunch is implemented across industries like healthcare and finance, ensuring comprehensive monitoring solutions that accommodate specific protocol and compliance requirements. It's tailored for seamless integration into various IT architectures optimizing monitoring capabilities tailored to industry standards.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. NetCrunch

July 2025

Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Performance Management vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.