We performed a comparison between Dell AppSync, Dell RecoverPoint, and NetApp SnapMirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, IBM, Dell Technologies and others in Copy Data Management."I believe one of the advantages we saw was that the configuration was manageable."
"This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
"The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it."
"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"The tool's most valuable feature is stability."
"The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"It is amazing because it is very easy to test with many alternative bookmarks."
"It excels in duplicating data between two distinct types of storage systems."
"When it works, it is the best product that is available."
"We use RecoverPoint for disaster recovery and asynchronous replication, and we use the application at a block level, not the software level. This has been tested, and it's very durable."
"NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions."
"Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool."
"The user interface is very easy to manage. The replication is also very easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."
"The tool seamlessly moves data over the network without putting pressure on the network."
"Data protection is a valuable feature."
"The technology enables us to have a safe backup."
"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."
"I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements."
"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"When it comes to storage and backup, that is where scalability problems have affected us."
"Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."
"The product should provide integration with new products."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"The support is horrible."
"We have different families of storage, such as the E-Series and Flash systems, but NetApp cannot be set up between them."
"The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better."
"The price could be cheaper."
"The price needs to be improved."
"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."
"At the moment, we are not using the synchronous mirror, but we can implement the synchronous mirror. The only thing is that it needs another license. This is the same issue we have with business continuity. It needs another license to be implemented. You need too many separate licenses for the features. They should add some of the aspects of the premium bundle into the basic bundle. Sometimes our customers choose other replication services because of the initial cost of the licenses."