Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell RecoverPoint vs Fivetran comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.4
Dell RecoverPoint offers high ROI and minimizes data loss, providing significant value and long-term IT security.
Sentiment score
7.2
Fivetran boosts efficiency and reduces engineering costs, enabling businesses to focus on operations rather than engineering solutions.
A bank experienced a disaster within ten years and was able to recover all data, avoiding substantial losses.
It saves us the effort of having one to two data engineers managing the tasks that Fivetran handles.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Dell RecoverPoint's support receives mixed reviews, with praised expertise but noted delays and global team's positive responsiveness.
Sentiment score
6.2
Fivetran's customer service gets mixed reviews, with praise and criticism for responsiveness, communication, and tech support experiences.
Dell support is robust, with geographically distributed branches and partner support.
The engineers and software teams respond immediately once they receive a call, offering high-quality service.
The technical support provided by Fivetran has generally been good, with a response time and competence that I would rate as good.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Dell RecoverPoint excels in scalability and data handling but may incur high costs and require significant storage.
Sentiment score
7.5
Fivetran scales across company sizes, handles data volumes, integrates sources easily, but involves cost and resource management challenges.
I consider Dell RecoverPoint highly scalable, rating it as a nine out of ten.
Dell RecoverPoint can handle large scales of data, which is typical in the banking sector.
I consider Dell RecoverPoint to be very scalable, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Dell RecoverPoint is stable with high reliability ratings; minor issues are quickly resolved, ensuring consistent performance and minimal disruptions.
Sentiment score
7.9
Fivetran is generally reliable with minor downtimes, but some users face challenges with connectors and varying vendor support.
It is considered to be very stable.
During the duration of the time that we used Fivetran, it was highly stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Dell RecoverPoint struggles with Flash reliance, storage limits, high costs, and lacks modern features like cloud replication.
Fivetran needs improvements in UI, security, cost, logging, customization, support, connectors, real-time processing, and API visibility.
The version designed for VMware, RecoverPoint for VMs, simplifies many problems in the VMware environment.
It requires double the storage capacity for source and target storage areas, which creates a heavy burden on storage resources.
Dell RecoverPoint can be improved by virtualizing it, which would use less storage and enhance performance.
From a cost perspective, if the number of connectors is lesser, then Fivetran is not the most cost-efficient option.
Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable.
 

Setup Cost

Dell RecoverPoint is moderately priced, valued for ease and bundling, but costs vary for enterprise and mid-size firms.
Fivetran pricing varies by usage and features, impacting small and large enterprises differently, with flexible but complex pricing.
VMware SRM was cheaper.
Dell RecoverPoint requires two sets of servers for both Data Center and Disaster Recovery, which can make it more expensive than other solutions.
Dell RecoverPoint is affordable for enterprises but not for mid-size organizations due to the required network investment for bandwidth across sites.
Our current yearly contract for Fivetran is approximately $70,000.
 

Valuable Features

Dell RecoverPoint provides effective data protection and recovery with low RPO, seamless replication, and automatic failover/failback features.
Fivetran offers easy, reliable data integration with built-in connectors, seamless setup, real-time syncing, and in-platform data transformation.
This feature is crucial for maintaining zero RPO and RTO, especially during any outage or disaster.
The failover and failback options are the most impactful features of Dell RecoverPoint in terms of data protection.
It operates seamlessly and efficiently, allowing for data recovery with no downtime during the copy process.
The most valuable feature of Fivetran is its built-in connectors for a wide range of data sources.
The ability to seamlessly integrate with a large variety of data sources is valuable.
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell RecoverPoint
Ranking in Data Replication
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Fivetran
Ranking in Data Replication
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (11th), Cloud Data Integration (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Dell RecoverPoint is 2.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fivetran is 4.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Faisal_Zia - PeerSpot reviewer
Continuous data protection guarantees data safety during outages and disasters
Based on my experience, I do recommend Dell RecoverPoint to other businesses. The environment requiring Dell RecoverPoint, such as banks or telcos where data equals money, cannot afford to lose data. The overall solution rating is eight, considering the competition from one or two more OEMs giving a tough time to Dell RecoverPoint.
Mediha Šiljić - PeerSpot reviewer
Built-in connectors offer extensive data source integration and time savings
Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users. There should be more adaptability in terms of new features. If a specific feature is required, it should be integrated promptly. Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable. Enhancements around customer-focused product adaptation are also suggested.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
30%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Healthcare Company
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
The image backup feature is great. For example, if you set the journal to take a backup every ten minutes, it will create a snapshot or pointer every ten minutes for as long as you need.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
Dell RecoverPoint is affordable for enterprises but not for mid-size organizations due to the required network investment for bandwidth across sites.
What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
The interfaces could be improved for better ease of use. There's also room for improvement in direct compatibility with other solutions. The version designed for VMware, RecoverPoint for VMs, simpl...
What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?
As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...
Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?
I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...
How much traffic can HVR Software handle?
As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...
 

Also Known As

RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit
Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell RecoverPoint vs. Fivetran and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.