NetApp SnapMirror vs Uplynk comparison

NetApp and Uplynk are both solutions in the Data Replication category. NetApp is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.1, while Uplynk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. NetApp holds a 15.0% mindshare in DR, compared to Uplynk’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

NetApp SnapMirror

Read 26 NetApp SnapMirror reviews

1,911 Views
1,873 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Uplynk

Read 6 Uplynk reviews

1,665 Views
67 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp SnapMirror

Uplynk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 5, 2025

NetApp SnapMirror and Uplynk compete in data management and streaming technology. SnapMirror is often preferred for its comprehensive disaster recovery and data integrity features, while Uplynk is favored for its streaming capabilities.

Features: NetApp SnapMirror's key features include robust disaster recovery solutions like Snapshots, SnapMirror replication, and Snapvault, ensuring reliable data replication. It offers efficient management and strong application integration. Uplynk is known for its prowess in streaming applications, with a focus on optimizing API calls for enhanced performance. Its security features are also highly commended.

Room for Improvement: SnapMirror requires enhancements in data compression and performance optimization. Addressing various replication demands and managing license costs would boost its appeal. Uplynk needs to expand its global endpoints and make pricing more competitive against providers like Cloudflare and AWS Cloudfront.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapMirror supports on-premises and hybrid cloud environments effectively, with excellent technical support and customer service. Uplynk operates within private and public cloud settings but faces challenges in global reach and support responsiveness. SnapMirror's support is particularly noted for its reliability.

Pricing and ROI: SnapMirror is considered expensive, yet its comprehensive capabilities justify the cost through a positive ROI, especially for its backup and disaster recovery functions. Uplynk is also noted as pricey, with suggestions for cost reductions to compete with more affordable options like Cloudflare, although both offer significant value for their features.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp SnapMirror

Ranking in Data Replication

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Uplynk

Ranking in Data Replication

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (9th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (30th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of NetApp SnapMirror is 15.0%, down from 21.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 2.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Abdul-Salam

Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Sohar International

Provides great data loss recovery and real time replication

Deployment was very smooth and took around two weeks. Following that, we carried out our data migration which took time. We previously used a Windows file independent server with its own local disk and Windows OS. It's not compatible with NetApp so data had to be physically migrated. We also took extra time integrating with our antivirus software and configuring external tape libraries with NetApp. We had one staff member involved in the deployment and an engineer from our partners. We have close to 900 users. The solution requires routine tasks as opposed to maintenance. We have three or four people with access to this storage.

Read full review

Eduardo Oviedo-Blanco

CTO and Game Developer at Solospace

A CDN solution to enhance loading times and streamline navigation

When one of the primary nodes spanning from North to South America, from the northern US to the southern US, became operational, it had a big impact. It can be challenging to explain its advantages to clients. The technical nature of the marketing material is too technical for stakeholders. Integrating the solution was straightforward, requiring no extra effort. Edgio Global CDN operates, resembling familiar cloud services but offering elevated functionality. Unlike platforms such as Google Cloud Platform or RIN geared towards development teams, Edgio emphasizes client-facing services that are integral to our operations. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With SnapMirror, the solution is the feature itself that is most valuable. It just replicates the data. It's very difficult to speak about, in the sense that it's similar to the features of a wheel. It is round and it's a part of an automobile."

"Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool."

"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."

"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."

"There are a lot of features that are excellent. The data compression during the transfer, for example, is good. The replication is great. The durability of the solution and the speed of the data moving from one site to another is impressive."

"NetApp SnapMirror's ease of use and reliability are valuable features."

"The technical support is quite good."

"The solution is very stable."

More NetApp SnapMirror pros

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

Cons

"There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution."

"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."

"The price could be cheaper."

"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."

"The GUI can be improved to perform complex tasks"

"We must be able to integrate Flash Pool with SnapMirror."

"The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better."

"We have different families of storage, such as the E-Series and Flash systems, but NetApp cannot be set up between them."

More NetApp SnapMirror cons

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be improved."

"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."

"The cost is low compared to different vendors."

"The pricing can be improved."

"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."

"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."

"It's a highly cost-effective solution"

"The product price is reasonable."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp SnapMirror?

The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapMirror?

The product price is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?

They could make continued enhancements in integration with diverse platforms for the product.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more affordable and now offers reasonable pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. By writing comprehensive tests and leveraging Expo's capabilities, I ensured cons...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal software engineer, and one of my responsibilities was leading mobile app development. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Snapshot vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 73% of the time

Hitachi TrueCopy vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 9% of the time

Dell AppSync vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 7% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 6% of the time

Hitachi Universal Replicator vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 5% of the time

More NetApp SnapMirror Competitors

Azure Front Door vs Uplynk

Compared 20% of the time

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 13% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 13% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 9% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror

August 2025

Download NetApp SnapMirror product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

August 2025

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

SnapMirror

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

NetApp SnapMirror technology provides fast, efficient data replication and disaster recovery (DR) for your critical data. Use a single solution across all NetApp storage arrays and protocols. SnapMirror technology works with any application, in both virtual and traditional environments, and in multiple configurations, including hybrid cloud.

NetApp

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk

July 2025

Free Report: NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.