NetApp SnapMirror vs Uplynk comparison

NetApp and Uplynk are both solutions in the Data Replication category. NetApp is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0, while Uplynk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. NetApp holds a 6.9% mindshare in DR, compared to Uplynk’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

NetApp SnapMirror

Read 26 NetApp SnapMirror reviews

1,906 Views
1,849 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Uplynk

Read 6 Uplynk reviews

1,798 Views
180 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp SnapMirror

Uplynk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

NetApp SnapMirror and Uplynk are key competitors in disaster recovery and streaming optimization categories, respectively. While SnapMirror offers robust disaster recovery capabilities, Uplynk has the upper hand in streaming performance optimization, catering to different enterprise needs.

Features: NetApp SnapMirror provides strong disaster recovery features like snapshots, data replication, and real-time failover, maintaining data integrity and efficient storage management. It integrates seamlessly with VMware and supports clustered Data ONTAP. Uplynk excels in streaming optimization with CDN caching and efficient API call improvements. Its Rules Engine V4 enhances website behavior and promotes secure application performance.

Room for Improvement: NetApp SnapMirror struggles with performance issues in controller volume access and SnapMirror deswizzling, impacting disk resources. Improvements are needed in replication technologies, data compression, and licensing cost management. Uplynk needs to expand its global reach and improve rule deployment user experience and product documentation for better CDN competitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp SnapMirror is suitable for hybrid and on-premises deployments, ideal for locally invested enterprises. Users appreciate its technical support, though service inconsistencies exist regionally. Uplynk offers simpler cloud deployments with its private and public options, benefiting from CDN expertise. While both receive positive support feedback, SnapMirror offers better support engagement for some.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp SnapMirror's high pricing, especially when bundled with licenses, is offset by its comprehensive data management benefits that enhance service availability for ROI. Uplynk requires pricing adjustments to match CDN competitors like Cloudflare. SnapMirror presents premium data protection value, whereas Uplynk is cost-effective for streaming solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp SnapMirror

Ranking in Data Replication

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Uplynk

Ranking in Data Replication

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (9th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (30th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of NetApp SnapMirror is 6.9%, down from 19.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 3.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NetApp SnapMirror	6.9%
Uplynk	3.2%
Other	89.9%

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Gabriele P

Storage IT Specialist at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees

Achieves seamless business continuity with robust scalability

The features of NetApp SnapMirror that I have found most valuable include the possibility to stop synchronization in case of high network latency and to limit the bandwidth throttle. This means limiting bandwidth when less connectivity occurs or opening wide the throttling to use the full speed of network connectivity, which we can adjust according to our needs or the needs of our customers. All of this is done without limiting business continuity, so business continuity is always guaranteed. NetApp SnapMirror's data replication feature supports disaster recovery strategies, as it is incorporated into the business continuity feature. SnapMirror is strictly related to snapshot features, a core part of ONTAP, so it's very flexible. It allows us to start with just two snapshots as a simple backup and then use them as a replication point or base for both backup and business continuity. There is no right or wrong answer, it just depends on how it works for specific needs.

Read full review

Joe Hernandez

Senior Software Engineer at OmniTier Inc

Improved mobile app development and user experience through optimization and security

The most valuable aspects include the optimization of application performance by optimizing API calls for a smoother user experience and faster load times. Furthermore, I restructured our code base to establish a more efficient development workflow. During my tenure, I integrated various security features for mobile applications, such as JWT tokens for secure authentication and data encryption using AES algorithms. I also focused on secure storage options, secure coding practices, and platform-specific security compliance, like Android's SafeNet and iOS Secure Enclave.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool."

"The most valuable feature is the snap shot."

"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."

"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."

"The product has good performance."

"The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements."

"The technical support is quite good."

"The solution is very stable."

More NetApp SnapMirror pros

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

Cons

"At the moment, we are not using the synchronous mirror, but we can implement the synchronous mirror. The only thing is that it needs another license. This is the same issue we have with business continuity. It needs another license to be implemented. You need too many separate licenses for the features. They should add some of the aspects of the premium bundle into the basic bundle. Sometimes our customers choose other replication services because of the initial cost of the licenses."

"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."

"The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better."

"The price needs to be improved."

"There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution."

"If they can make the application free like other vendors or include it in all the packages, it would be great."

"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."

"Compression and deduplication could be improved."

More NetApp SnapMirror cons

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing can be improved."

"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."

"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."

"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."

"The product price is reasonable."

"The pricing could be improved."

"It's a highly cost-effective solution"

"The cost is low compared to different vendors."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp SnapMirror?

The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapMirror?

The product price is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?

Some areas of NetApp SnapMirror that could be improved or enhanced include synchronous SnapMirror, which needs improvement as it suffers significantly from network latency. In particular, synchrono...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more affordable and now offers reasonable pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. By writing comprehensive tests and leveraging Expo's capabilities, I ensured cons...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal software engineer, and one of my responsibilities was leading mobile app development. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Snapshot vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 44% of the time

Hitachi TrueCopy vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 11% of the time

Hitachi Universal Replicator vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 11% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 11% of the time

Global-active device vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 7% of the time

More NetApp SnapMirror Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Uplynk

Compared 8% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror

January 2026

Download NetApp SnapMirror product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

January 2026

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

SnapMirror

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

NetApp SnapMirror technology provides fast, efficient data replication and disaster recovery (DR) for your critical data. Use a single solution across all NetApp storage arrays and protocols. SnapMirror technology works with any application, in both virtual and traditional environments, and in multiple configurations, including hybrid cloud.

NetApp

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk

December 2025

Free Report: NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp SnapMirror vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.