We performed a comparison between Datadog and Dell CloudIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found error reporting and log centralization the most valuable features. Overall, Datadog provides a full package solution."
"The most valuable aspect is for us to have everything in one place."
"By moving to Datadog, we did not need to manage our own monitoring infrastructure anymore."
"The solution has helped our organization with custom events to track specific cases."
"We like the distributed tracing and flame graphs for debugging. This has been invaluable for us during periods of high traffic or red alert conditions."
"It has empowered all our platform engineers with a very powerful and easy to use monitoring system."
"The ease of correcting these dashboards and widgets when needed is amazing."
"The fact that everything is under a single pane of glass is really valuable, as developers don't have to spend their time copying correlation IDs across tools to find what they need."
"Has really nice roll-up dashboards."
"Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution."
"The tool for forecasting capacity is valuable."
"Mobile application is the most valuable feature for us. We can monitor all the storages on our phones. It's really good."
"The best thing about this solution is that you can check for the infrastructure and system updates that you might need to be compliant with the Cloud."
"Even though it is powerful on its own, the UI-based design lacks elegance, efficiency, and complexity."
"I'd like to see better pricing and more integration in the next release."
"We need more advanced querying against logs."
"There are things about it that we would like to be fixed, such as it is taking averages of average. This results in data that we don't expect."
"Since the Datadog platform has so many separate features, solving so many use cases, there are often inconsistencies in feature availability and interoperability between products."
"It would be nice to be able to graph metrics by excluding certain tags (like you can do in monitors)."
"The ease of implementation needs improvement."
"ECS could be improved by including more tutorials for beginners to reduce the barriers to entry."
"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."
"In terms of improvement, they should enhance the product range."
"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."
"Doesn't do well in terms of integrating with technologies other than Dell."
"PowerScale is the only file system offered and that is limiting."
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 136 reviews while Dell CloudIQ is ranked 41st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 5 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while Dell CloudIQ is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dell CloudIQ writes "Easily visualize your environment's performance and forecast its capacity". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics, whereas Dell CloudIQ is most compared with HPE OneView, Cisco Intersight, Moogsoft, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and VirtualWisdom. See our Datadog vs. Dell CloudIQ report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
