Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cybereason Managed Detection & Response vs Digital Guardian Endpoint Detection and Response Service [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Managed Detectio...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (22nd)
Digital Guardian Endpoint D...
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Peter Nowak - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Development Manager for Cybereason at Bechtle
Quick response and reliable restoration enhance security operations
If the language barrier was addressed, it would lower the barrier for a number of German customers. It would take away a unique selling point for our own specialist managed service. I'm a bit hesitant, however, this would improve the product or the offering. Detection time already is very quick. The completeness of the offering was integrating more data. I am discussing with a customer who wishes to include identity data. Detecting early when someone tries to compromise your ID would be a nice feature.
reviewer1500507 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Architect at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Great detection and response with very good compliance reporting
The solution protects your data classification very well. It does data discovery. It also does detection and response. It's pretty awesome. If you do the managed detection and response, it's beneficial due to the fact that they're the ones that are going to be doing the work for you. They're the ones that are going to end up servicing your organization. They focus on threat hunting, and threat detection as well as the compliance of it. All the tools are managed. They have the compliance reporting. They have the incident response detection where it remotely tells you, "Hey, there's an issue here." It will catch stuff and then it will send you notifications. The loss prevention is excellent. They have very high rates in terms of catching people stealing information. If you have a person signing into their Hotmail account and inserting a spreadsheet in there from the finance department, they will catch it. It will immediately notify the manager about the sensitive information being stolen. It's a very new solution. It's cleaner in its look and feel than other solutions. The deployment's so much easier than other options. You have visibility across your protection line. There is very good data visibility and data classification, and, on top of that, you have all the bells and whistles.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Automated information on zero-day threats is provided without us needing to ask."
"The quick reaction and the ability to restore the state before within a short time are significant."
"The quick reaction and the ability to restore the state before within a short time are significant."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is endpoint management...The solution's support team is quite good at giving us feedback if there is an issue."
"The deployment's so much easier than other options."
 

Cons

"For every new client or every new case, my company has to spin up a new instance, because of which there is a new URL."
"If the language barrier was addressed, it would lower the barrier for a number of German customers. It would take away a unique selling point for our own specialist managed service."
"The interface, particularly the dashboard we use for looking at alerts, could be improved."
"If the language barrier was addressed, it would lower the barrier for a number of German customers."
"Typically the competition will undercut them and they'll lose on price as they are quite expensive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, Cybereason Managed Detection & Response is effective for larger companies, but if you have a small company with less than 1,000 employees, then it gets expensive."
"When you buy Digital Guardian, the starting price is around $300,000. It's out of the box."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Retailer
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Managed Detection & Response?
The valuable aspect of pricing is that we do not need our own data center and software licensing, which reduces costs.
What needs improvement with Cybereason Managed Detection & Response?
Initially, we observed multiple false positive alerts with Cybereason Managed Detection & Response. We've worked with Cybereason to whitelist and fine-tune alerts, particularly those related to...
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Managed Detection & Response?
We have configured multiple scenario-based alerts for Cybereason Managed Detection & Response, such as known malware, potential unwanted programs, and PowerShell execution. We monitor suspiciou...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Cybereason MDR
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

CONNECTICUT WATER, BEAM SUNTORY, CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT, RTI Surgical, HOSPITAL REVENUE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, MCBEE ASSOCIATES, FORTUNE 500 BANK
Adidas, Orbitz
Find out what your peers are saying about Huntress, CrowdStrike, Field Effect and others in Managed Detection and Response (MDR). Updated: January 2026.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.