Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform comparison

Cybereason and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Cybereason is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.2, while Kaspersky is ranked #55 with an average rating of 6.7. Cybereason holds a 1.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.
Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews
  • 2,717 Views
  • 1,536 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Att...
Read 6 Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform reviews
  • 299 Views
  • 152 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform are both advanced cybersecurity solutions. Cybereason is favored for its support and pricing, while Kaspersky is valued for its extensive features.

Features: Cybereason offers robust threat detection, automated response, and detailed incident analysis. Kaspersky features detailed attack visualization, threat intelligence integration, and advanced sandboxing.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason users suggest improvements in system resource utilization, streamlined integration, and enhanced features. Kaspersky users seek better reporting capabilities, reduced false positives, and improved performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason is praised for its straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support. Kaspersky's deployment can be complex, though its customer service is helpful.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason is cost-effective with satisfying ROI. Kaspersky’s pricing is higher, but its extensive features justify the expense, making it competitive.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
23rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (34th)
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Att...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
55th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer - PeerSpot reviewer
We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious
The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.
Read full review
FarkhundAbbas - PeerSpot reviewer
The tool provides excellent sandboxing and email security features, but the backup and recovery features are not good
If my primary solution is down, no backup solution is available to restore it. It is one of the biggest weaknesses of the platform. If I need to update the solution, there is no option to pick the events and the logs from it and deploy it in another solution. The backup and recovery features of the product are not good. I need backup. If the tool is down for some time, I cannot get the logs at that particular time.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."
"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."
"We didn't have the visibility that we now have. It has increased our visibility by a lot. So, we put a lot more time into really looking at our environment and what is happening throughout our different networks. It has increased our visibility by around fivefold."
"Their EDR solution, the ability to mitigate issues through their command line, is probably the best feature that we've had. We use that all the time. It's very useful for doing investigations."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"The initial setup process is straightforward."
"It gives all the information in a clear response."
"The dashboard is very good and you can consider it as an interactive UI."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros
"I feel the anti-ransomware update is one of the tool's valuable features."
"The product's deployment phase is easy."
"The most valuable use is detailing metadata collection from the endpoint and network."
"The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your rules to detect these attacks because you can leverage threat intelligence. Y"
"The email security feature is really good."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is stable and runs all the time."
 

Cons

"Compared to our previous endpoint, we have a lot more false positives and a lot more duplication of alerts. So we're chasing more alerts."
"Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality."
"The reporting feature needs improvement."
"Its Microsoft PowerShell protections still need some compatibility improvements. We have run across just a few. It is compatible with 90% of what we have in our network, but there is that 10% that we are still struggling with as far as compatibility with the type of PowerShell scripts needed to run our day-to-day business."
"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."
"There can be problems with the EDI."
"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."
"There is room for improvement in the product features related to device control, particularly USB management."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons
"The backup and recovery features of the product are not good."
"The blind spot or gap in the platform is network analysis functionality."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is not a good product. We had problems with endpoints and the solution did not detect it. We didn't get any alerts about the attack."
"I think the tool is still not really good enough for integration compared to other products."
"The solution lacks cloud integrations."
"In some of the places I have come across, even though they use Kaspersky, the ransomware enters their system."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."
"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."
"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."
"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."
"The pricing is manageable."
"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."
"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."
"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice
"Kaspersky is one of the cheaper solutions."
"The solution has competitive pricing."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is cheap."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
33%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...
See all answers
What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
The interface is user-friendly.
See all answers
What do you like most about Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?
The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your rules to detect these attacks because you can leverage threat intelligence. Y
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?
Its price is reasonable; it's neither very high nor very low, considering its capabilities.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?
I think the tool is still not really good enough for integration compared to other products. If you need to integrate with the ecosystem of the Kaspersky primary, and if we are going to the third p...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 28% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 15% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 10% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 5% of the time
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors
Darktrace vs Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Logo
Darktrace vs Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
Compared 56% of the time
Trend Vision One vs Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Logo
Trend Vision One vs Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
Compared 44% of the time
More Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
May 2025
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reportDownload Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
April 2025
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform reportDownload Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform product report
 

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond
Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack
 

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Today’s cybercriminals constantly design unique and innovative methods of penetration and compromise. To avoid perimeter prevention technologies they use social engineering, non-malware and supply chain attacks to operate under the radar of security designed to catch ‘bad’ traces. It’s not enough to just ‘know’ what’s bad or dangerous – enterprises need to understand what’s normal, and use AI-driven techniques that simplify and automate this process. Targeted Attack Analyzer is a machine learning engine that involves self-learning to establish the baseline of normal, legitimate activities of an entire network. Through continuous network telemetry collection it finds deviations, detects suspicious activities and predicts further malicious actions at the initial stages of multilayered attacks.

Kaspersky
 

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital
Republic of Serbia, Goods.ru, Tael, Insolar
Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
April 2025
Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.