CyberArk Certificate Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

CyberArk and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. CyberArk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while RSA is ranked #26. CyberArk holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of RSA users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Certificate Manager

Read 13 CyberArk Certificate Manager reviews

1,175 Views
811 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

RSA Adaptive Authentication

Read 6 RSA Adaptive Authentication reviews

458 Views
348 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

CyberArk Certificate Manager

RSA Adaptive Authentication

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2025

CyberArk Certificate Manager and RSA Adaptive Authentication compete in cybersecurity management, focusing on identity security and authentication. RSA Adaptive Authentication is seen as having the advantage due to its advanced security features and real-time fraud detection.

Features: CyberArk Certificate Manager delivers comprehensive digital certificate lifecycle management, secure infrastructure integration, and automated certificate handling. RSA Adaptive Authentication offers strong multi-factor authentication, advanced fraud detection analytics, and dynamic risk assessment.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk could enhance user interface complexity, improve customization options, and expand scalability. RSA might develop more user-friendly setups, speed up integration timelines, and refine pricing structures for more accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Certificate Manager provides streamlined deployment with detailed support resources and strong customer service. RSA Adaptive Authentication offers modular deployment adaptabilities aligned with high-security requirements, supported by effective customer assistance.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Certificate Manager offers competitive pricing aimed at maximizing ROI through efficient certificate management. RSA Adaptive Authentication tends to be more costly initially, justified by its extensive security capabilities and high ROI potential in preventing fraud.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Certificate Manager

Ranking in Authentication Systems

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

RSA Adaptive Authentication

Ranking in Authentication Systems

26th

Average Rating

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of CyberArk Certificate Manager is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Adaptive Authentication is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Venafi	1.3%
RSA Adaptive Authentication	0.8%
Other	97.9%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Adam Goldstein

Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Automates certificate management across platforms and has enhanced integration support

Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively. We integrated it with GlobalSign and aimed to automate DNS verification, although challenges remained. Venafi's platform-agnostic nature was beneficial for handling certificates across different systems like IIS, AWS, and Azure. It ensures centralized certificate management, which is crucial for compliance and maintaining best practices. It significantly improved our operational efficiency by automating certificate workflows. This reduced the number of certificates requiring manual management, freeing internal resources from deploying trivial certificates. While some complex certificates still needed manual intervention, automating simpler ones eliminated internal bottlenecks associated with tasks like uploading certificates to Imperva. By automating these processes, we reduced errors, streamlined workflows, and eliminated the need to repeatedly remember and execute complex procedures, ultimately increasing our overall operational efficiency. The automation capabilities are good; when properly configured, it performs as expected.

Read full review

Directorc4e7

Director of Cyber Security at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We need better ease of use; the product is overly complicated

There are many use cases that we have defined based on our business needs Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features. The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated. It has taken years to implement. We used RSA…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Venafi is super stable, and we experienced no issues with its stability."

"It's definitely worth the money to have Venafi as a tool; it's definitely miles away from the competition, in my opinion."

"We have reduced 80% to 90% of our outages with Venafi, which impacts the revenue substantially."

"The most important feature for us is the ease of use. If something is not available, we can develop our own scripts for it. We can create change management around this tool."

"We use Venafi for PKI certificates."

"Venafi solved the issue of many misplaced internal certificates, as we know that at one place we can get all the information, and the problem of notifications about expiring certificates is resolved, improving our overall system for Expedia."

"The most valuable feature of Venafi is the automation that helps save time and reduce human error."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is their certificate discovery."

More CyberArk Certificate Manager pros

"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."

"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."

"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."

"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."

"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."

Cons

"Currently, specific processes require manual installations due to the lack of built-in integrations."

"Venafi excels in automating certificate rotation and deployment but could enhance its offering by improving support for hardware security modules like Fortanix and providing more advanced, out-of-the-box integrations with public certificate authorities for DNS re-verification."

"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations. They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns."

"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations."

"There are quite a few different technical aspects of Venafi that I feel they just missed out on; I'd have to look at my notes for the specifics."

"Venafi's overall installation could be made easier."

"The on-prem version is far more mature than the cloud version, which lacks a lot of features that the on-prem version offers, at least when we did the POC and evaluated the product."

More CyberArk Certificate Manager cons

"It has taken years to implement."

"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."

"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."

"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."

"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."

"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is complex, considering factors beyond the number of certificates. This complexity can make our payments to Venafi challenging if costs continue to rise. It is good but more expensive than the competitors."

"Venafi's pricing appears to be competitive within the market."

"Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."

"The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."

"Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."

"You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

43%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Venafi?

We use Venafi for PKI certificates.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Venafi?

For our budget, Venafi's cost is moderate. It's not expensive as internal certificate generation is free, and we only pay for the public CA certificate signer and for storage in Venafi. With the to...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Venafi?

As an end user, I cannot specifically point out improvements, but I believe it would be beneficial to display active certificates in a separate column on the UI, so users can easily find what they ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AppViewX CERT+ vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 32% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 25% of the time

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Axiad Conductor vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 10% of the time

More CyberArk Certificate Manager Competitors

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Adaptive Authentication

Compared 62% of the time

RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication

Compared 38% of the time

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Certificate Manager

September 2025

Download CyberArk Certificate Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

August 2025

Download RSA Adaptive Authentication product report

Also Known As

Venafi

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Certificate Manager automates and streamlines certificate processes, reducing errors and enhancing efficiency. It centralizes management, supports compliance, and improves certificate lifecycle management with customizable features.

CyberArk Certificate Manager offers a streamlined approach to managing certificates, focusing on automation that minimizes manual intervention and errors. Its discovery and centralized management enhance operational efficiency, while integration capabilities facilitate seamless handling of certificates across systems like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from its user-friendly, intuitive interface, robust reporting, and customizable notifications, which improve compliance, reduce bottlenecks, and allow for custom field creation. Though the on-premises version is mature, there is room for improvement in cloud service integration and out-of-the-box features. Additional enhancements are needed in documentation clarity, hardware security module support, and diverse scripting language support.

What are the most important features of CyberArk Certificate Manager?

Automation: Streamlines certificate processes to reduce errors and manual intervention.
Centralized Management: Consolidates certificate handling for enhanced efficiency.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates integration with platforms like AWS and Azure.
Customizable Notifications: Tailors notifications for compliance and operational efficiency.
Robust Reporting: Provides detailed insights into certificate statuses.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Error Reduction: Minimized manual errors due to automated processes.
Enhanced Security: Centralized management improves security and governance.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines management to reduce bottlenecks.
Compliance Support: Integrates processes that ensure regulatory compliance.

CyberArk Certificate Manager finds applications across multiple industries like finance and healthcare where stringent security protocols are critical. Organizations use it for server authentication and managing application IDs, ensuring compliance and preventing outages. Its integration with major cloud platforms and automation of installations across endpoints makes it an ideal choice for companies focusing on enhancing security and operational efficiency.

CyberArk

RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.

RSA

Sample Customers

Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication

September 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.