We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The solution's most valuable aspect is that it easy to install. The user experience is very good."
"Enables easy integration, allowing for 2FA with our VPN."
"I appreciate its ability to provide multi-factor authentication, but it's primarily focused on this function."
"The initial setup of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is easy."
"For someone concerned with multifactor authentication, I'm satisfied with the product."
"Intuitive interface and easy to deploy."
"It keeps track of users and their IPs no matter where they are in the network. When users roam, we don't have to worry about not mapping them to an IP."
"Valuable features include the robust SSO features, when you have more complicated authentication within an organization. We can mix AD, Radius, Portal, SSO Portals (Google, etc.), and build our own environment. It is very flexible."
"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."
"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."
"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."
"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."
"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."
"I don't have any issues with this solution, but it may need a better, more user-friendly interface or better design of the platform."
"It would be helpful to receive a code by yourself for authentication instead of it registered to a phone."
"We had issues trying to integrate the keys properly during the initial setup."
"They could expand FortiAuthenticator's capabilities to accommodate a broader range of environments."
"Lacks a simplified two-factor authentication process."
"I would like to see more security features in reference to identity login or identity identification."
"The only issue I encounter is that when not using FortiAuthenticator for an extended period, it's typical to encounter some obstacles in the configuration process that you need to address."
"The integration with third-party tools must be better."
"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."
"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."
"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."
"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."
"It has taken years to implement."
"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 52 reviews while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix and IBM Trusteer.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.