Control-M and WorkFusion compete in the realm of enterprise automation solutions, each bringing unique strengths to the table. Control-M tends to have the upper hand in extensive automation and comprehensive scheduling, while WorkFusion stands out in cognitive automation and machine learning for data processing.
Features: Control-M is distinguished by its comprehensive automation across various platforms, advanced job scheduling capabilities, and extensive integration with third-party applications like SAP and Informatica. On the other hand, WorkFusion specializes in document processing and machine learning, making it a robust option for automating unstructured data workflows and handling repetitive tasks efficiently.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could advance by enhancing output analysis and end-user reports, and offering more flexible integration tools. Conversely, WorkFusion might benefit from a streamlined infrastructure and better cloud integration, along with improvements in OCR and machine learning features to increase accessibility and ease of use for non-technical users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M is predominantly deployed in on-premises and hybrid cloud settings, with strong technical support, though there's a call for improved SLA management. WorkFusion, although versatile in deployment models, is often perceived as complex during setup. However, both products offer a range of deployment options, with Control-M having a slight edge in customer satisfaction due largely to its extensive support resources.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M's pricing is generally based on job counts, leading to potential high costs, but its enterprise-level features justify the investment by offering significant automation benefits. WorkFusion, viewed as expensive due to its wide-ranging enterprise features, still offers good automation value. Both solutions are considerable investments, promising substantial ROI inline with their respective operational strengths.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
If something fails at 3 AM in the morning, you need to fix it and get it back up and working really quickly.
Some issues are resolved quickly, while others might take time as they require further analysis.
They allow sharing of issues faced in use cases and work alongside us to resolve them.
Initial support often struggles to find solutions, leading to delays until more experienced personnel get involved.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.
The number of bots currently running on the platform should be more than 1,000, including RPA and non-RPA bots.
WorkFusion is efficient for structured automation tasks with predefined templates and clear documentation.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
Once properly implemented, the system becomes very stable, which is one of its strongest attributes.
I frequently face issues with infrastructure and some WorkFusion-related problems, such as login issues.
WorkFusion requires a strong background in Java to meet requirements effectively.
Some stability problems may arise from processes that have not been designed or coded properly, leading to glitches.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
In low-code automation, most parts are not customizable, particularly when Excel is involved, which increases complexity.
WorkFusion requires a high level of Java knowledge for programming, making it quite technical.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
I am not familiar with the exact pricing, however, it is considered pricey.
Currently, I would rate their pricing around two, as WorkFusion's cloud version seems costly compared to others.
It is worth the money as a tool.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.
They provide an inbuilt Selenium framework and infrastructure that eases my workload, allowing me to write Java code and embed it within Groovy classes.
It also supports reusable code components through Java, making it efficient for developers.
The platform now includes auto machine learning and AI capabilities.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Control-M | 4.7% |
WorkFusion | 0.6% |
Other | 94.7% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 26 |
Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
Large Enterprise | 113 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 10 |
Large Enterprise | 23 |
Control-M by BMC is engineered to manage hybrid cloud workflows, offering orchestration capabilities starting at $29,000 annually. Aimed at helping growing teams, it efficiently supports cross-environment scheduling and automation needs.
Control-M offers robust cross-platform scheduling, automation, and integration with applications such as SAP and Informatica. Users appreciate its ease of use with a graphical interface, centralized management, and monitoring capabilities. Advanced features, including Managed File Transfer, automated error handling, and real-time alerts, enhance productivity. The ability to unify workflows and support diverse environments makes Control-M a trusted tool in many sectors. While improvements in reporting flexibility and API integration with tools like ServiceNow are needed, addressing performance issues during upgrades could enhance its value. Offering improved support for new technologies and cloud environments is beneficial, with cost-effectiveness being a consideration.
What are the key features of Control-M?Control-M is leveraged in industries like finance for enterprise scheduling and data management, supporting mainframe, Linux, Unix, Windows, and cloud platforms. It contributes to workflow orchestration and workload automation, improving operational efficiency and enhancing IT infrastructure across those environments.
WorkFusion, Inc. is the creator of AI-enabled Digital Workers designed specifically for banking and financial services organizations. Its Digital Workers are true knowledge workers that effectively augment existing teams in functions like anti-money laundering (AML), sanctions, customer onboarding, Know Your Customer (KYC), and customer service. WorkFusion’s digital workforce solutions help solve talent shortages, increase workforce capacity, save money, enhance employee and customer satisfaction, and ensure ongoing compliance. For more information visit workfusion.com.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.