No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cofense Platform vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cofense Platform
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (33rd), Security Incident Response (12th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (43rd), Security Awareness Training (11th)
Splunk SOAR
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Cofense Platform is designed for Email Security and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, focuses on Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR), holds 7.1% mindshare, down 7.9% since last year.
Email Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cofense Platform1.2%
Proofpoint Email Protection6.3%
Microsoft Defender for Office 3655.7%
Other86.8%
Email Security
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Splunk SOAR7.1%
Microsoft Sentinel9.3%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR8.9%
Other74.7%
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

MohamedShaker - PeerSpot reviewer
Sales Team Leader at ITVikings
Secures the business for customers quickly and accurately
It secures the business for the customers. For instance, if any phishing emails come into the environment and employees see it, we direct the email to Triage. The Triage system will investigate it through AI technology to see if it's a phishing email or not. If it is a phishing email, it will quarantine it and erase it from the environment.
Vikash Kushwaha - PeerSpot reviewer
Full-Stack Software Engineer at mindpathtech
Automated playbooks have transformed incident response and now protect critical services
The biggest advantage I see from my personal experience as an integrator with Splunk SOAR is that it integrates with most of the security features among the Defenders, Microsoft Defender, firewalls, CloudWatch, and AWS security agents, as well as EC2 machines, firewalls, EDR, IAM, email security, and antivirus. It automates the security process over phishing emails and any other brute force attacks. It helps quite a lot because if 100 phishing emails were sent to a domain, a developer can only reach one, two, or five, but for hundreds of others, it actually supports better automated playbooks and provides major security. Splunk SOAR introduced some new and innovative capabilities or approaches that transformed the way my SOC operates. Splunk SOAR provides playbooks for automatic security features, such as for firewalls, phishing mails, and utilizing Defenders or virtual tools. A playbook maintains its algorithms or processes, so if any kind of security issue arises, the playbook automatically runs and handles actions such as IP blocking or resolving brute force attacks, notifying the admin about suspicious users. After implementing Splunk SOAR, the training process for my SOC team to use playbooks takes a long time during the whole integration part, as it retrieves all credentials from us, whether for an EC2 machine or any antivirus. It takes about one to two months for the team to fully sustain and know the processes of the playbooks and security, particularly for three or four individuals in the cyber security or DevOps team. Splunk SOAR significantly reduces the time spent on monotonous security tasks. In banking, insurance, or healthcare, automated services for addressing phishing emails and security threats are common. Having a manual workforce of two or three individuals can only handle five or ten security threats while Splunk SOAR automates the entire process across apps and machines, making it easier and notifying the admin about the threats. If someone tries to breach, Splunk SOAR immediately processes incoming requests, validating them and blocking any unsecured requests, which reduces a lot of time and effort. With the help of the playbook viewer, I assess the visibility provided by Splunk SOAR as very positive, especially for security purposes. If someone is attacked by 100 users, it blocks all the users, while individual developers such as myself can only handle two or three at a time. The automated process of Splunk SOAR handles all the processes concurrently, making it a game-changing solution. It helps reduce mean time to resolve (MTTR). It takes around 10 to 20 minutes to resolve one incident through the whole process and notify the admin of the issue. If there are multiple incidents, calculating the time taken for each, it generally requires around 40 to 50 minutes to resolve five incidents.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It secures the business for the customers."
"For instance, if any phishing emails come into the environment and employees see it, we direct the email to Triage. The Triage system will investigate it through AI technology to see if it's a phishing email or not. If it is a phishing email, it will quarantine it and erase it from the environment."
"It's pretty scalable."
"I like the integration capabilities of Phantom. It has a lot of integrations with other products. Its searching methodologies are also good. It is also easy to understand and easy to create playbooks."
"The most valuable feature is the risk-based access control."
"The visibility for Splunk SOAR is extremely clear and very user-friendly and intuitive."
"The best feature is the integration and the custom Python code that we can write. Splunk SOAR provides us with both of these capabilities, allowing us to integrate different security solutions with Splunk SOAR and take remediation actions directly on those security tools."
"Splunk SOAR has freed up our resources by automating tasks like IOC enrichment, reputation checks, ticket creation, and incident updates, reducing our manual efforts by approximately 20 to 30 percent and giving our analysts more time to focus on complex tasks and complex investigations."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR is the automated playbooks, which saves analysts time."
"The benefits were immediate when we started using Mission Control Splunk SOAR over a year ago; it has made it easier for our analysts to work on alerts using playbooks and forward them."
 

Cons

"If they continue improving and enhancing this solution, it could be even faster and more accurate."
"Splunk SOAR should improve its ease of upgrade, which is a pain point for us right now."
"The number of playbooks on offer should be increased."
"Some of the training materials are on a basic level."
"In my opinion, the focus should be on improving its simplicity, specifically the interface, and configuration."
"We want to see improvements made to the APIs such that we can connect to many different systems and data sources."
"They should integrate Splunk Enterprise Security better into Splunk Cloud."
"The pricing is on the expensive side compared to other players in the market who are more cost-effective."
"Splunk SOAR follows very flat pricing and most of the time it's very high when compared to the other competitors."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."
"The tool is not cheap."
"The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."
"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."
"Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."
"I found the price of Splunk SOAR to be good."
"While I can't confirm the exact pricing, some colleagues have mentioned that Splunk SOAR may be on the costlier side."
"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
911,549 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise48
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?
For pricing, I would rate Splunk SOAR a seven where one is high price and ten is low price.
What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?
Splunk SOAR could be improved by making playbook development easier for new users and providing better troubleshooting and debugging options. More out-of-the-box integrations and simpler configurat...
What is your primary use case for Splunk Phantom?
My main use case for Splunk SOAR is automating repetitive SOC tasks and speeding up incident response, and I mainly use it for alert enrichment, gathering information from security tools, and perfo...
 

Also Known As

Cofense Intelligence, PhishMe Intelligence, Intelligence ThreatHQ, Cofense Triage, Cofense LMS
Phantom
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Jackson Health System
Recorded Future, Blackstone
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Microsoft, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Email Security. Updated: August 2026.
911,549 professionals have used our research since 2012.