Cofense Platform vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Cofense and Splunk solutions aren't in the same category. Cofense is ranked #32 in Email Security , and holds a 1.2% mindshare in the category. Splunk is ranked #1 in SOAR , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution.

Cofense Platform

Read 1 Cofense Platform review

4,021 Views
1,689 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Splunk SOAR

Read 71 Splunk SOAR reviews

10,966 Views
9,321 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Cofense Platform

Splunk SOAR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cofense Platform and Splunk SOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Microsoft, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Email Security.

To learn more, read our detailed Email Security Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Email Security

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,930 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cofense Platform

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (32nd), Security Incident Response (12th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (42nd), Security Awareness Training (11th)

Splunk SOAR

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Cofense Platform is designed for Email Security and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, focuses on Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR), holds 7.0% mindshare, down 7.7% since last year.

Email Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cofense Platform	1.2%
Proofpoint Email Protection	5.9%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	5.2%
Other	87.7%

Email Security

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Splunk SOAR	7.0%
Microsoft Sentinel	9.1%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR	8.8%
Other	75.1%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

MohamedShaker

Sales Team Leader at ITVikings

Secures the business for customers quickly and accurately

It secures the business for the customers. For instance, if any phishing emails come into the environment and employees see it, we direct the email to Triage. The Triage system will investigate it through AI technology to see if it's a phishing email or not. If it is a phishing email, it will quarantine it and erase it from the environment.

Read full review

Vikash Kushwaha

Full-Stack Software Engineer at mindpathtech

Automated playbooks have transformed incident response and now protect critical services

The biggest advantage I see from my personal experience as an integrator with Splunk SOAR is that it integrates with most of the security features among the Defenders, Microsoft Defender, firewalls, CloudWatch, and AWS security agents, as well as EC2 machines, firewalls, EDR, IAM, email security, and antivirus. It automates the security process over phishing emails and any other brute force attacks. It helps quite a lot because if 100 phishing emails were sent to a domain, a developer can only reach one, two, or five, but for hundreds of others, it actually supports better automated playbooks and provides major security. Splunk SOAR introduced some new and innovative capabilities or approaches that transformed the way my SOC operates. Splunk SOAR provides playbooks for automatic security features, such as for firewalls, phishing mails, and utilizing Defenders or virtual tools. A playbook maintains its algorithms or processes, so if any kind of security issue arises, the playbook automatically runs and handles actions such as IP blocking or resolving brute force attacks, notifying the admin about suspicious users. After implementing Splunk SOAR, the training process for my SOC team to use playbooks takes a long time during the whole integration part, as it retrieves all credentials from us, whether for an EC2 machine or any antivirus. It takes about one to two months for the team to fully sustain and know the processes of the playbooks and security, particularly for three or four individuals in the cyber security or DevOps team. Splunk SOAR significantly reduces the time spent on monotonous security tasks. In banking, insurance, or healthcare, automated services for addressing phishing emails and security threats are common. Having a manual workforce of two or three individuals can only handle five or ten security threats while Splunk SOAR automates the entire process across apps and machines, making it easier and notifying the admin about the threats. If someone tries to breach, Splunk SOAR immediately processes incoming requests, validating them and blocking any unsecured requests, which reduces a lot of time and effort. With the help of the playbook viewer, I assess the visibility provided by Splunk SOAR as very positive, especially for security purposes. If someone is attacked by 100 users, it blocks all the users, while individual developers such as myself can only handle two or three at a time. The automated process of Splunk SOAR handles all the processes concurrently, making it a game-changing solution. It helps reduce mean time to resolve (MTTR). It takes around 10 to 20 minutes to resolve one incident through the whole process and notify the admin of the issue. If there are multiple incidents, calculating the time taken for each, it generally requires around 40 to 50 minutes to resolve five incidents.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It secures the business for the customers."

"For instance, if any phishing emails come into the environment and employees see it, we direct the email to Triage. The Triage system will investigate it through AI technology to see if it's a phishing email or not. If it is a phishing email, it will quarantine it and erase it from the environment."

"Compared to other products, Phantom seems to be easy to use and the ability to customize is high."

"Splunk SOAR helps a lot with consolidating our networking, security, and observability tools, and we are saving almost 200 hours compared to not using Splunk SOAR."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the playbook automation just because it allows us to reduce the manual actions that SOC has to handle."

"It's pretty easy when it comes to setting up assets. If you want to fetch emails or call a REST API, you can set up an asset and grab that information."

"We are not a 24/7 SOC, so the most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR is the auto-response to threats when we are not in the office and the notifications that it sends to the on-call engineer."

"Splunk SOAR has made a huge impact across security operations and the business overall."

"The most valuable features of Splunk SOAR are the easy integration with other solutions, including other Splunk solutions. The most important playbooks we need on the market come already on the Frontend. However, nowadays, Splunk changed its name, it's not Frontend anymore, it's Splunk Store. This is a very strong point."

"Splunk SOAR is more user-friendly than those tools and provides more precise and advanced information that we require to analyze whether a case is a true positive or false positive."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"If they continue improving and enhancing this solution, it could be even faster and more accurate."

"Overall, this product is fairly good but it's not quite mature yet. It needs some enhancement and some stabilization in some areas."

"We've run into a few minor issues. Some of the playbook writing is a bit complicated. We've had a few hiccups with the source control. We'd really like to use GitHub deployment keys for a dedicated account. We haven't been able to do that. I think those are some of the major ones."

"Splunk SOAR has room to improve its offering for small-sized customers. The price is not fair for smaller-sized customers."

"I have not seen a return on investment. We have not realized any measurable business outcomes, such as cost savings or risk reduction, from using Splunk SOAR."

"In terms of improving Splunk SOAR, it is challenging to identify areas, but it is not purely a no-code solution and it needs a much better IDE platform where things are simplified, so that someone who does not have much understanding of Python or coding languages can do the work, and the cost is another factor since it is a costly platform."

"From the improvement point of view regarding Splunk SOAR, I suggest including more types of LLM models such as autonomous AI models including Anthropic and Opus 4.6, as well as creating a playground for new users to work on these, which will significantly help solve complex problems and assist new companies in understanding how Splunk works easily."

"Splunk SOAR could be improved by making playbook development easier for new users and providing better troubleshooting and debugging options."

"It would be nice if we could put it on other search heads, not just Enterprise Security."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I found the price of Splunk SOAR to be good."

"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

"The licensing cost is reasonable."

"In my opinion, the price is high, but if you want good products, you have to be willing to pay for them."

"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

"Splunk SOAR is moderately priced, neither cheap nor overly expensive."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,930 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

For pricing, I would rate Splunk SOAR a seven where one is high price and ten is low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR could be improved by making playbook development easier for new users and providing better troubleshooting and debugging options. More out-of-the-box integrations and simpler configurat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Splunk Phantom?

My main use case for Splunk SOAR is automating repetitive SOC tasks and speeding up incident response, and I mainly use it for alert enrichment, gathering information from security tools, and perfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Cofense Platform

Compared 9% of the time

PhishER Plus vs Cofense Platform

Compared 7% of the time

IRONSCALES vs Cofense Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Mimecast Advanced Email Security vs Cofense Platform

Compared 6% of the time

KnowBe4 vs Cofense Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Cofense Platform Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 10% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 8% of the time

Torq vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 7% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 6% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Email Security

August 2026

Download Cofense Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

August 2026

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

Cofense Intelligence, PhishMe Intelligence, Intelligence ThreatHQ, Cofense Triage, Cofense LMS

Phantom

Overview

Cofense Platform provides advanced anti-phishing solutions, utilizing cutting-edge technology to detect, respond, and reduce phishing threats efficiently.

Designed for enterprise security, Cofense Platform emphasizes real-time threat analysis and operates with a high degree of precision in mitigating phishing risks. It integrates seamlessly into existing infrastructures, offering flexibility and scalability for businesses of all sizes. Recognized for its comprehensive email security and user-friendly training modules, it empowers organizations to stay ahead of evolving security threats. Its ecosystem of interconnected tools ensures adaptive threat response and seamless collaboration among security teams.

What are the key features of Cofense Platform?

Phishing Detection: Utilizes AI-driven techniques to identify and neutralize phishing threats rapidly.
Automated Threat Response: Provides real-time, automated responses to mitigate potential security breaches.
User Training: Engages employees with interactive phishing simulations to enhance their awareness and response skills.
Intelligence Sharing: Enables information exchange within the community to fortify defenses with shared data insights.
Scalability: Offers scalable solutions adaptable to the size and needs of the organization.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Security Efficiency: Reduces phishing incident response times significantly.
Cost Savings: Minimizes potential financial losses by preventing breaches before they occur.
Enhanced Employee Awareness: Increases the overall security posture by engaging users directly.
Customizable Solutions: Adapts to the unique requirements of each organization for maximum effectiveness.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, Cofense Platform is renowned for its ability to handle high-volume email threats and its robust integration capabilities. These sectors benefit from targeted threat intelligence and responsive phishing defense strategies, safeguarding sensitive data and maintaining compliance.

Cofense

Splunk SOAR focuses on automating security operations with seamless third-party integrations and customizable workflows, enhancing incident response and threat management.

Splunk SOAR offers robust playbook automation and powerful API connectivity, allowing organizations to streamline workflows and integrate extensively with tools like Salesforce and ServiceNow. With its capabilities in real-time data visualization and automated threat responses, it significantly enhances security and reduces manual efforts. Users appreciate the ease of creating playbooks, which reduces mean time to detect and resolve. However, attention to its integration challenges with Microsoft products, the need for more playbooks, and improved customization tools is necessary. Enhancements in the development process, visibility, scalability, and case management options are also beneficial. Improving documentation and training resources would add more depth and accessibility.

What are the top features of Splunk SOAR?

Third-party integrations: Supports extensive integration with tools like Salesforce and ServiceNow.
Playbook automation: Facilitates easy creation and management of automated workflows.
Customizable workflows: Offers Python-based customization for tailored security operations.
API connectivity: Powerful API support for seamless tool consolidation and streamlined workflows.
Data visualization: Provides real-time data visualization for enhanced situational awareness.

What benefits or ROI users should consider?

Operational efficiency: Reduces mean time to detect and resolve incidents through automation.
Manual effort reduction: Automates threat responses, minimizing manual workload in security operations.
Enhanced security: Offers end-to-end visibility and automated threat mitigation processes.
Time savings: Optimizes processes and improves response efficiency in cybersecurity operations.

Organizations implement Splunk SOAR in industries to automate tasks in Security Operation Centers, addressing incidents such as phishing, brute force, and ransomware. It integrates with third-party applications for threat intelligence enrichment, commonly deployed both on-premise and cloud, enhancing cybersecurity efforts.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Jackson Health System

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Microsoft, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Email Security. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,930 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.