We performed a comparison between Cleo Integration Cloud Platform and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of use it provides. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is a straightforward and simple product."
"This tool has exceptional API management and integration connectors in addition to multiple out of the box connectors."
"The solution offers multiple deployment options."
"The most valuable feature is that it's programmer-friendly, so it's very easy to develop APIs."
"Mule Expression Language"
"I like that it's user-friendly. Compared to other ESBs, I find it easier to use. I like it better than other ESBs. I like the connectors, which make calling the APIs through the routers easier."
"The most valuable feature of Mule ESB is data transformation, i.e. our interacting with different systems and orchestrating for our business needs."
"I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid."
"It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications."
"Currently, the solution fails to provide users with additional protocol assistance and API integrations, so the aforementioned areas need to be considered for improvement."
"The solution isn't as stable as we'd like it to be. There are some ongoing issues and therefore Mule has to provide frequent patches. Mule's core IP should be more stable overall."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"The stability could be improved."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"Mule ESB could be more user-friendly. I think users must learn about the architecture before they start coding. The price could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an EDIFACT integration."
"From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved."
"It should have some amount of logging."
More Cleo Integration Cloud Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is ranked 13th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is rated 7.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cleo Integration Cloud Platform writes "Though the tool reduces the internal hosting cost for businesses, it needs to provide more API integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and IBM B2B Integrator, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.