Cleo Integration Cloud Platform vs webMethods.io comparison

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of use it provides. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is a straightforward and simple product."

"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."

"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."

"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."

"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"It integrates well with various servers."

"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."

"The developer portal is a valuable feature."

"I like the tool's scalability."

"Currently, the solution fails to provide users with additional protocol assistance and API integrations, so the aforementioned areas need to be considered for improvement."

"It is an expensive solution and not very suitable for smaller businesses."

"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."

"Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."

"Understanding the overall architecture is difficult."

"I would like to see the price improve."

"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."

"The solution should include REST API calls."

"They should develop clear visibility for the onboarding."

"I learned that the product's price is reasonable based on the interactions I had with my company's purchase team."

"It is worth the cost."

"I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors."

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"The price is high and I give it a five out of ten."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support."

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."