"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"The platform has many modules, and each module examines a different situation in the behavior."
"The most valuable feature is that it works autonomously."
"The most valuable feature is the solution's ability to trim out the false positives and point your attention to the real important stuff."
"The active threat dashboard is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"Darktrace is very flexible."
"The most valuable features of Darktrace are the tracing of unusual external emails and monitoring the local network."
"It is a stable solution without downtime."
"It is very stable and easy to use."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It would be useful if there was a way to check to see if there are certain devices that are not in sync with the solution. I'm not sure if this is an option or not."
"This product needs more in terms of prevention. The detection capabilities work well but once a threat has been detected, Darktrace should work to prevent it from doing anything malicious."
"The price point for the product was too high for what our possible use case could be."
"The solution could be easier to use."
"I would like to see more protection in the endpoint. Especially because we have a lot of people using VPNs. If they would improve end point security, it would give more control there."
"The cost is a bit on the higher side."
"Darktrace requires numerous configurations. It would be beneficial if the configuration could be made simpler."
"In terms of improvements, fine-tuning is the area where we have to spend some time because it works on unsupervised machine learning. It would be good if they can improve their algorithm or technical functionality to reduce the fine-tuning effort. They can also come up with something at the endpoint level. So far, Darktrace has been a network detection response (NDR) solution. It does not offer much at the endpoint level or on user-client devices or servers. There should be more visibility at the endpoint level. It would be good to have the detection and response at the endpoint level by Darktrace. It should also have integration with an agile environment so that we can have continuous development and continuous integration in the application development environment. This is currently not there. It should also have internet-facing platform visibility, which is currently missing. They also need to improve the reporting and management dashboards. Currently, these are not so easy for a non-technical person. All these features would make Darktrace much better, and they would also be helpful in selling more solutions."
Claroty Platform is ranked 1st in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection with 1 review while Darktrace is ranked 13th in Email Security with 65 reviews. Claroty Platform is rated 8.0, while Darktrace is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Darktrace writes "Great autonomous support, offers an easy setup, and has responsive support". Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Armis and SCADAfence, whereas Darktrace is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Vectra AI, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Network Analytics.
We monitor all Cyber-Physical Systems Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.