Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claroty Platform vs Tenable OT Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 10, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claroty Platform
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (9th), Vulnerability Management (17th), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (1st)
Tenable OT Security
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of Claroty Platform is 25.5%, up from 25.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable OT Security is 11.7%, down from 13.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operational Technology (OT) Security
 

Featured Reviews

Deevanshi Priya - PeerSpot reviewer
Achieve certifications with progress tracking and potential for enhanced interactivity
I was using Claroty to complete training assigned by my company. The courses were self-paced and helped me get certified in two additional certifications. I plan to use it further as I have a task list for future courses. It was primarily for certification and study materials The feature I like…
PapadAnandKumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps identify vulnerabilities and risks for IT and OT assets
Tenable OT Security is fine, but I find it more language-based rather than structured. It feels like something is on a web page, and the dashboards and data representations are not cool. First of all, I said that the tool view should be improved. It looks pretty old. Second, the details Tenable OT Security provides regarding the metadata they work with should be more in-depth. Its main focus is vulnerability management, which is fine, but what about threat actors? What about attack vectors and OT vulnerabilities? There are major areas, baselines, etc. that need attention.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Claroty is very beneficial for learning and adds value to your resume."
"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."
"The solution's asset management is really great compared to Dragos or Nozomi."
"Claroty provides continuous threat protection and identifies pre-empty stuff and false positives."
"Claroty identifies all vulnerabilities available in our environment."
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"I have had a very good experience with the Claroty Platform."
"I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally."
"It's for securing the vulnerability of the OT solutions they are using. We mitigate those through patch management activities and find vulnerabilities easily with this security solution."
"The clear distinction between IT and OT that Tenable OT provides is its most valuable feature."
"The product has easy-to-manage features and components."
"The initial setup was very easy, and I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"The biggest advantage is that with good infrastructure, you can utilize asset planning when using Nessus along with Tenable OT Security."
"The active query inventory is the most valuable feature."
"I like Tenable OT Security for two main reasons. Firstly, it helps identify vulnerabilities and risks for IT and OT assets, which is crucial for our operations. Secondly, it performs external port scanning, including vulnerability scans for open ports. Compared to the Claroty Platform, the tool offers detailed asset discovery capabilities."
"The product’s price is its most valuable feature."
 

Cons

"I've reported four bugs and three feature requests so far. The main area of focus should be on how attacks are detected. The attack vector information needs to be more detailed. For example, it's not enough to state that an SMB v1 version open can lead to a WannaCry attack. A more detailed explanation should help clients understand the various ways an attack could occur."
"There should be AI security solutions implemented."
"We face issues in the alert investigation area because it does not properly give the alert communication patterns."
"If more AI features could be included with the Clarity solution, it would be feasible for everybody."
"There is room for improvement in the user interface to make it more vibrant and interactive, similar to IT tools."
"The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match. Sometimes, these CVEs are not actually related to the device in the firmware at the site."
"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."
"I think the only issue is that the hardware Claroty uses is expensive."
"As an IT security professional, I would like to see automation improvements in the response part of Tenable OT Security."
"Tenable OT product is good, but OT security itself is still maturing."
"The solution should provide more features to prevent attacks."
"Tenable OT Security is fine, but I find it more language-based rather than structured. It feels like something is on a web page, and the dashboards and data representations are not cool. First of all, I said that the tool view should be improved. It looks pretty old. Second, the details Tenable OT Security provides regarding the metadata they work with should be more in-depth. Its main focus is vulnerability management, which is fine, but what about threat actors? What about attack vectors and OT vulnerabilities? There are major areas, baselines, etc. that need attention."
"Tenable.ot's integration with one of the products needs improvement."
"As an IT security professional, I would like to see automation improvements in the response part of Tenable OT Security. However, I understand that implementing automation in OT environments can be quite challenging."
"During upgrades, the previous configuration may be lost, creating support issues."
"The solution could detect changes in reading variables. The support of IoT devices can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is quite expensive."
"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."
"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."
"The product is inexpensive."
"The tool's pricing is fair enough."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution do you prefer: Nozomi Networks or Claroty Platform?
Nozomi Networks and Claroty Platform are both leading operational technology (OT) security solutions offering a wide range of features, including asset discovery, risk assessment, and threat detect...
What do you like most about Claroty Platform?
The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts.
What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?
If more AI features could be included with the Clarity solution, it would be feasible for everybody. As AI is booming now, there are concerns about AI security. There should be AI security solution...
What do you like most about Tenable OT Security?
The product’s price is its most valuable feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable OT Security?
The pricing of Tenable OT Security is standard and comparable to market prices. It is not as expensive as most products in the similar line.
What needs improvement with Tenable OT Security?
As an IT security professional, I would like to see automation improvements in the response part of Tenable OT Security. However, I understand that implementing automation in OT environments can be...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.ot
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
Nesher Cement Enterprises, City of Raleigh
Find out what your peers are saying about Claroty Platform vs. Tenable OT Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.