


Workspace ONE UEM and Check Point Remote Access VPN compete in the domain of enterprise security and device management. Check Point Remote Access VPN seems to have a slight edge in providing seamless remote connectivity with robust security capabilities.
Features: Workspace ONE UEM offers robust device management capabilities including flexible provisioning, seamless app deployment, and integration with rich REST APIs for enterprise workflow automation. It also supports multi-platform environments and offers advanced email management. Conversely, Check Point Remote Access VPN is recognized for its secure remote connectivity which includes multifactor authentication and strong encryption. It integrates well with existing Check Point infrastructure for stability and ease of use.
Room for Improvement: Workspace ONE UEM could enhance reporting functionalities, support quality, and integration with cloud solutions. Users also desire better MDM capabilities for Mac devices and improved multi-cloud session support. On the other hand, Check Point Remote Access VPN needs to simplify the setup of remote client policies and enhance support for Linux, as well as improve its user interface and compliance checks across various OS platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Workspace ONE UEM provides flexible deployment across public, private, and hybrid cloud environments but faces challenges with the consistency of customer support. Check Point Remote Access VPN is primarily deployed on-premises and praised for its user-friendly deployment process; however, its customer support requires improvements in response speed and issue resolution expertise.
Pricing and ROI: Workspace ONE UEM is considered expensive, particularly for SMBs, although larger enterprises may find value in its comprehensive features. Check Point Remote Access VPN offers competitive pricing, especially for those utilizing Check Point's NGFW, and is seen as cost-effective. Both products show varied ROI dependent on enterprise size and specific needs, with some users noting substantial savings and efficient resource management.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment.
With Microsoft Intune, tasks such as device provisioning, policy deployment, application delivery, and compliance enforcement require less manual effort than in more traditional management models.
It reduces the dependency on being physically present in the office and enhances the overall user experience, saving time and maintaining security.
I have seen a return on investment with fewer employees needed and time saved.
It has reduced the number of support tickets related to remote access by about 30%, saving our IT team significant time.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
They are really helpful, and whenever we face any technical or configuration issues, we reach out to them, and they help us resolve the issues as soon as possible.
Contacting the Technical Assistance Centers (TACs) initially can be difficult, but once I get in touch with the TAC team, it is easy to solve problems.
The customer support for Check Point Remote Access VPN has been very helpful and responsive whenever we needed assistance.
Support responds immediately, but I see that some engineers are new or they don't have experience collecting logs, so they take two to three days to come back.
The support side has recently become weaker compared to what it used to be with VMware.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
I don't see that we can hit any kind of roof in our organization.
The scalability of Check Point Remote Access VPN is good as it supports a large number of remote users simultaneously.
Our organization finds Check Point Remote Access VPN handles increased numbers of remote users smoothly without performance issues.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
It appears Microsoft Intune undergoes changes without informing customers.
In my experience, Microsoft Intune is a stable platform as it is a cloud-based service, and updates are regularly delivered by Microsoft.
Otherwise, the experience and stability are outstanding.
I have not faced any issue, downtime, or latency with Check Point Remote Access VPN.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is very stable.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
The response time is much worse, with the first layer of support lacking sufficient knowledge on how to troubleshoot issues.
Optimizing handshake speed and reducing reconnection delays would improve the user experience, particularly for mobile and hybrid workers.
Deploying these solutions requires higher technical expertise than other solutions.
Another concern is that support is getting reduced by Workspace ONE; some customers are saying there are support issues on Workspace ONE right now.
The documentation is not comprehensive compared to other VMware solutions or Microsoft documentation.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
It is competitively priced, and we have chosen it for its market leadership in the firewall space.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are straightforward, though the setup is a bit expensive.
Everything is included in the firewall licensing, so it's free to use as long as you have a firewall.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my organization by improving productivity and given us a workaround in times of downtime.
Check Point Remote Access VPN has impacted my organization positively by providing better security and ensuring our data is safe within the entity.
In UEM, the most helpful part of Windows Management is the baseline policy and central script; using this, you can replace all the AD GPO policy.
In terms of assessing the capability of Workspace ONE UEM in maintaining compliance across all endpoints, that's a very handy feature set.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Intune | 7.1% |
| Check Point Remote Access VPN | 2.9% |
| Workspace ONE UEM | 4.4% |
| Other | 85.6% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 151 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 60 |
| Large Enterprise | 177 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 31 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 40 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 58 |
Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.
Check Point Remote Access VPN enables secure connectivity from remote locations with features like strong encryption and multifactor authentication. Its compatibility with multiple devices ensures operational flexibility for employees and partners accessing corporate resources.
Check Point Remote Access VPN integrates with current firewalls, providing robust security and seamless management. It supports effective remote work with centralized control, allowing users to connect securely from anywhere. While valued for its ease of use and stable performance, it faces limitations in Linux support and requires improved documentation. High-load performance inconsistencies and installation complexities are areas for development. Its adaptability to diverse systems, including cloud integration, offers scalable connectivity solutions.
What are the key features?Organizations in industries like technology and finance implement Check Point Remote Access VPN to maintain secure remote connectivity for employees and partners. By enabling access to internal resources and applications, they support effective remote work and adhere to stringent data security standards, particularly during increased remote working demands or business travel scenarios.
Workspace ONE UEM is a comprehensive platform for centralized device management offering advanced security and seamless integration. It's ideal for managing mobile and IoT devices, providing centralized administration capabilities for businesses.
Workspace ONE UEM stands out due to its user-friendly interface and extensive multi-platform support. It provides policy-driven device control, advanced application and content management, and secure remote access. Its excellent third-party integration and strong security measures make it particularly beneficial for managing devices across different platforms. The platform is tailored for businesses looking for scalable solutions that support BYOD policies, application deployment, and user authentication. While praised for stability and comprehensive features like email management, there are calls for improved integration with Active Directory and better pricing strategies.
What are the most important features?Organizations across industries implement Workspace ONE UEM for its sophisticated management strategies, critical in sectors like healthcare for secure patient data management, finance for compliance, and education for supporting diverse device policies. Its integration capabilities make it essential for sectors requiring stringent security and seamless operational workflows.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.