Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs OpenVPN Access Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 31, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Check Point VPN facilitates remote work, enhances flexibility, and offers cost savings with returns between 40%-100%, boosting stability.
Sentiment score
2.1
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise efficiently connects employees, balancing initial costs with intellectual value, and provides essential connectivity benefits.
It reduces the dependency on being physically present in the office and enhances the overall user experience, saving time and maintaining security.
In this case, everything is pre-inbuilt, allowing me to easily create new users and share their details so they can connect to Check Point VPN and access internal servers.
I have seen a return on investment with fewer employees needed and time saved.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.8
Check Point Remote Access VPN is praised for excellent customer service and effective issue resolution, despite some communication challenges.
Sentiment score
3.6
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise technical support is highly rated, with responsive service and comprehensive documentation aiding user problem-solving.
Contacting the Technical Assistance Centers (TACs) initially can be difficult, but once I get in touch with the TAC team, it is easy to solve problems.
The timing of technical support does not always align with our working hours.
While the support team is generally good, it takes at least three to four days to address ticket issues.
It was very good, and I would rate it an eight.
I have not dealt with support or customer service, however, the documentation is good, and I would rate it a seven out of ten.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers scalability and reliability, efficiently supporting numerous users with flexible licensing and robust architecture.
Sentiment score
5.5
OpenVPN Access Server is scalable yet faces challenges like international expansion, downtime, and client ease-of-expansion processes.
Currently, 130 users can connect simultaneously, and it is very reliable and efficient.
I don't see that we can hit any kind of roof in our organization.
The scalability of Check Point Remote Access VPN is good as it supports a large number of remote users simultaneously.
It's not very easy to expand, and it would be beneficial if the process were simpler.
I would give OpenVPN a six out of ten for scalability, as it's usually a single user or single device.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers stable, reliable connections, efficiently supporting growth and thousands of users with minimal downtime.
Sentiment score
4.1
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise is stable and reliable, with minor issues during Windows 10 updates resolved by patches.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable and has been reliable for my users.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is very stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Remote Access VPN faces challenges with complexity, support, integration, pricing, scalability, and lacks automation and intuitive features.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise needs improved usability, stability, security, and features like Active Directory support and centralized management.
Deploying these solutions requires higher technical expertise than other solutions.
Check Point Remote Access VPN can be improved by having more granular options to steer traffic, like easier configurations for split tunneling, which is currently complex.
Check Point Remote Access VPN could improve by automatically switching between my two ISPs when one goes down.
If they had a one-click setup where you provide credentials instead of manually running commands, that would be beneficial.
OpenVPN could improve in centralized management.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Remote Access VPN is affordable with straightforward licensing, balancing price and security while integrating well with NGFW.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise offers transparent pricing, affordable plans, and exceptional value, making it cheaper than Microsoft and Cisco.
It is competitively priced, and we have chosen it for its market leadership in the firewall space.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are straightforward, though the setup is a bit expensive.
The pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Check Point Remote Access VPN are a bit low compared to my previous solution.
My experience with pricing is excellent as the pricing is free.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Remote Access VPN ensures secure, scalable connectivity with seamless integration, strong encryption, and centralized management for remote users.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise offers easy setup, strong security, compatibility, affordability, and seamless integration with multiple operating systems.
The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
The visibility offered by Check Point Remote Access VPN has benefited my organization as it detects unauthorized access attempts, immediately alerting me via a pop-up for any threat protection issues.
We don't know what vulnerabilities exist in outside networks, so when they connect to Check Point Remote Access VPN, they enter the internal network where traffic is monitored by my firewall, which provides comprehensive threat protection and prevents users from connecting to malware.
The most valuable features of OpenVPN are its ease of use, client familiarity, end-user familiarity, operating system integration, and price points.
What I appreciate the most about OpenVPN Access Server is that it's very easy to set up.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Remote Access VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (6th)
OpenVPN Access Server
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 3.8%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenVPN Access Server is 15.3%, up from 15.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise15.3%
Check Point Remote Access VPN3.8%
Other80.9%
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2751156 - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized user management reduces administrative costs and improves deployment speed
They could make Check Point Remote Access VPN easier to integrate with Entra ID and Azure, so that we can use Azure roles together with the VPN. The documentation on how to integrate is out of date, not maintained, and not really supported from Check Point's side. It's a great and stable VPN service that could benefit from more and better features, such as Active Directory or Entra ID integrations.
LAWAL YUSUF - PeerSpot reviewer
Has robust features for encryption and stability
We use the product for secure remote access, including WiFi and IoT device security The product has strong encryption and scalability features. It provides security for private network connections. The product’s connectivity is very slow. It could be faster. We have been using OpenVPN Access…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
866,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
University
7%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise31
Large Enterprise33
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
They could make Check Point Remote Access VPN easier to integrate with Entra ID and Azure, so that we can use Azure roles together with the VPN. The documentation on how to integrate is out of date...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
We have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for about a year. We use Check Point Remote Access VPN as the main way to access resources inside our data centers. We have tied it together with th...
How does Fortinet FortiClient compare with Open VPN Access Server?
Fortinet FortiClient is a feature-rich solution that is easy to use and deploy without sacrificing safety and security. It has a very fast connection rate and has a built-in VPN. With this solution...
What do you like most about OpenVPN Access Server?
OpenVPN Access Server is a simple and easy-to-use solution that I can use myself without anybody's help.
 

Also Known As

Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
OpenVPN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Verizon, Amazon, Disney, HP, Microsoft, IBM, Samsung
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN Access Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
866,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.